ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

852 Words4 Pages

If you could play your favorite sport in college and be paid, would you? Division one colleges have not been paying their athletes not because they don’t need too, but rather because they don’t want to. Although colleges don’t pay their athletes, colleges are allowed to use their players apparel to gain money the actual athletes, making colleges the money, are not getting paid. This has been an ongoing debate on sports channels, such as ESPN. All Division one colleges should pay their players based on how well they play and how many jerseys with their number get sold.
If the athletes playing Division one then most of the athletes life will be, without a doubt, dedicated on that sport, so they won’t have time for side jobs. Thus, an explanation …show more content…

The money was Some players may be paid more and some players may be paid less. In the article NCAA ban on athlete pay is upheld by the CNN Wire it talks about how much the sports make. The combined total of both football and basketball incomes for only Division one were $1.2 billion. This information was in 2013-2014, and by now we know that each year for these types of sports the money exponentially rises, which means each player could be paid $5,000 with some variations depending on the player. In the article Pay to play? Should college athletes be paid it states that, “In the past 12 years, the money generated by the two sports has increased nearly 300%”, which means that with time, colleges are just earning more and more money while players aren’t being paid. Some people may argue that athletes shouldn’t be paid, because they are getting their scholarships paid for. In the article Pay to play: Should college athletes be paid it says how Athletes receive scholarships for $200,000 over 4 years. This is good for the players because scholarships can cost a heavy amount. Although, if I were Division one and I knew there was a great possibility of going to a professional league and the only reason as to why I am in that college is to get into the professional league, not for education. So to some Division one athletes, those scholarships are almost useless to them if they really wish to go

Show More
Related
965 Words | 4 Pages

Should college athletes be paid, or should they just be happy with the scholarship they are given? In the article “Why College Athletes Should Be Paid”, the author Tyson Hartnett claims that college athletes deserve to be paid. In the article, he states, “A $25,000 scholarship may seem like a lot of money, but it really only covers the basics” (Hartnett par. 5). Hartnett feels that college athletes deserve a salary because they are “typically dead broke” (Hartnett par. 9), even though they bring lots of attention and money to their schools.

Read More
1283 Words | 6 Pages

Dalton Collins Berthot English III 2/24/2017 College Athletes Should Not Be Paid College athletes are given scholarships to cover their tuition and other expenses in college, so should they be paid a salary for their athletic performances as well? They are receiving something far more valuable than a chance to play college ball. They are receiving an education that will provide for them and last a lifetime. College athletes should not be paid to perform on the field or the court. Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a topic that is debated more and more these days.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.

Read More
1965 Words | 8 Pages

Even after the money for scholarships in taken out of the total profit, these programs are still making a substantial amount of money. In the book The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values, James Shulman and William Bowen examine the effects that intercollegiate sports have on the college campus, the students, and the athletes. It is inferred from the statistical results of a graph provided in Shulman and Bowen’s book that the athletic department at Division I university such as Duke University has made as much as fifteen million dollars in one year (Shulman and Bowden 232). The graph also shows that it only costs about 3 million to pay the scholarships of all of the athletes (Shulman and Bowden

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

In 2013, the NCAA made $770 million dollars from the NCAA tournament, a three week basketball tournament to determine the national champion of college basketball (D’Alessandro). Not a single player playing in this tournament did not see a single cent of this revenue. Many analysts and people in the sports business have debated on if college athletes should be paid. With the growth of collegiate sports, the NCAA should pay their athletes a percentage of their profit because the athletes are the reason why the NCAA make a profit, and college athletes have to work hard to maintain their studies and their physical fitness. This, also, could affect how many years that college players stay in college.

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

The reasons college athletes should be paid is because although they have their scholarship; it typically does not pay for everything. Secondly other people make money off of the college athletes. And lastly college athletes do not have the time to get a decent job, or even a job at all. The NCAA does not allow athletes to be paid which

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

College athletes are not professional athletes, therefore they should not be paid a salary. Athletes already get a hefty scholarship worth around $250,000. Mentioned before, after federal income taxes, a scholarship is definitely the better option. The researcher found many different opinions on this topic.

Read More
2151 Words | 9 Pages

Since the beginning of NCAA athletes have poured their blood, sweat and tears into the sport they are passionate about. Its always about the love of the game, who out works the other and many of sacrifices to be a student athlete at the collegiate level. When athletes reach their goal to enter in the collegiate level it becomes more like a business, and their job is win games and championships which ultimately brings profits to these universities. Over the years people including the athletes have debated upon the issue on whether college athletes should be paid. Some people argue that athletes should get paid because they don’t have time to work or find a job.

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

Should College Athletes Be Paid Regge D. Dayton Madison High School Intro How would you feel if college students were being paid to play sports at a collegiate level? Many people feel it is the right thing to do because of all of the work they put into the game. While others feel these athletes are already being rewarded enough with others things that they are given. College athletes make their school a lot of money, bring a lot of attention and entertainment to the world while putting a lot of effort into the sport, but these athletes are given scholarships along with other things; Therefore these college athletes should not be paid for playing collegiate sports.

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

In conclusion, college athletes should be paid because they bring in a ton of revenue for their schools while risking injury and yet are unable to afford the cost of living. The time that is put into the sport is the equivalent, if not more, than the time that is put into a full time job. Only thirty-three percent of students receive scholarships, most of them partial. Also, only one percent of all college athletes will play professional sports after their college tenure is served. The NCAA and Division One Colleges generate profits that do not trickle down to the athletes.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

One of the biggest debates of the twenty-first century when it comes to the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) is whether student-athletes should be paid. Many fans have their own opinions about the matter. College athletes have a lot of things to manage when in season and just in general. From keeping their grades up to making sure they get reps at practice are just a few of the things that athletes have to worry about during the school year. In my opinion, I believe athletes should be paid based on the money the school brings in and endorsements.

Read More
1852 Words | 8 Pages

Horace Mitchell, the author of Students Are Not Professional Athletes in the US News, believes that “Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives for a career in sports (Mitchell). Mitchell believes in the idea that these students are given enough benefits by having access to prestigious universities through their participation in sports (Mitchell). Despite the fact that the author is making uncomplicated statements, he is able to back up every statement by providing examples of his comments. For example, he stated that these students chose to participate in collegiate sports as a part of their educational experience, and then he backs up the statement by explaining how they maintain a distinction between student-athletes who participate in the college model and professionals who are also students. Likewise, Mitchell noted that their may be a way to solve the issue for student athletes not having to participate in a part-time job; “It is reasonable that student-athletes should have additional resources typical for full-time students work during the academic year…”

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

On average division one athletic programs lose an average of 11 million dollars every year.(NCAA.org) With the 460,000 college athletes(NCAA.org) to monetarily compensate for their time athletic programs. College athletes should not get paid. College athletes should focus on getting a degree, forming unions, and negotiate benefits. If players start to get paid for playing in college athletics the sport will no longer be considered amateur.

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

Being a college athletes take full time dedication and participation in regular classes. When you have the privilege of attending such universities, and colleges you are only representing the bests. That means, when you graduate, you will have of the best support and scholarships that you can possibly achieve. This situation mostly only applies to the students who attend the fanciest universities, and colleges. Some scholarships may seem like a lot money, but cover only the mysterious, housing, tuition, fees, meal-plan, multiple hundred-dollars textbooks and unknown fees.

Read More
1541 Words | 7 Pages

Most NCAA sports do not make enough profit in order to pay their players any more than their scholarships, due to the fact that most sports do not draw large crowds and have much popularity. The focus on paying college athletes would mainly be on Division 1 football and men’s basketball players, the two sports that bring in the overwhelming amount of the NCAA’s athletic revenue. These two sports bring in billions of dollars due to large television and media contracts, and the amount of public support for these two sports. The gap between amount of profit made by the NCAA and the amount of compensation that football and basketball players receive is the largest, making it important that these players are paid for what they are worth to the NCAA and the universities that they

Read More

More about Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document