More handpicked essays just for you.
Why college athletes should be paid
Research argument for why college athletes should be paid
Debate on why college athletes should be paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
College athletes have been huge in America since the early 1900s. With the emergence of social media the prevalence of college sports have increased further. There have been numerous scandals across college sports for athletes taking money for signing objects. This brings up the highly controversial debate over whether or not these athletes should be paid. Tyson Harnett addresses this topic in “Why college Athletes Should Be Paid<” when he takes a side and provides examples as a former collegiate athlete.
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
Athletes risk potentially debilitating effects to their personal lives by playing collegiate sports, according to Grand Canyon University’s article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” This problem leads to many people wondering why collegiate athletes still play sports. In the article “The Effects of Compensation for NCAA Athletes” by Mykel Kinard, he explains how the NCAA has been pocketing billions of dollars and profiting off of athletes’ NIL without allowing athletes to legally receive compensation for decades. Another reason athlete compensation is in question is because of how it’s power used to be abused. For example, in 2018, Deandre Ayton, a five-star recruit, accepted a scholarship to play at The University of Arizona.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
The thesis in this text is clear and noticeable, it is “One of the most controversial questions; Should college athletes be paid?”. It is the second sentence, it states in the beginning what the author will be talking about. The central argument of the essay was why college athletes should not be paid. The author provides support for his opinion by stating some of NCAA’s rules. The author told an anecdote about when he was a college athlete.
Professional coaches and colleges are making millions of dollars in revenue every year from over enthusiastic fans and stage tickets because of sports league . Some people believe that none of the revenue that universities and colleges make, should be dispersed among the students in any way. That means creating laws against giving anything for free to students. They believe that when you pay student athletes to play the sports that they want to learn. It wouldn't be considered a class anymore, instead it would be consider a job which would defeat the purpose of going to college.
If we pay college athletes that will work even more hard when they come to practice and working out in the weight room. “Billions of dollars are being passed around by the NCAA and they don't pay the athletes anything”, (Stephen 1) but the coaches get majority of the money. Pay athletes, they work way to hard just for title, they deserve more than just a ring and a pat on the back. The money that the NCAA gets can be put in college athletes pocket instead of being put in the pockets of those who don't put in the work. “Pay not perks” (Stephen 1) should be given to athletes.
They have to put in work on and off the field of court. Three, the coaches and everybody else but the players are paid. These kids take time from their school work and personal things to get things done for their sports team and don’t get anything in return. “Nick Saban will make $11 million in the year of 2018 coaching the football team of Alabama University.” (www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6778847/college-athletes-deserve-paid.)
Statistically showing, at least 100,000 college football players get hurt yearly. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a cent. Every time a football player steps onto the field, they’re risking themselves for injury.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
