Summary Of Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

College athletes have been huge in America since the early 1900s. With the emergence of social media the prevalence of college sports have increased further. There have been numerous scandals across college sports for athletes taking money for signing objects. This brings up the highly controversial debate over whether or not these athletes should be paid. Tyson Harnett addresses this topic in “Why college Athletes Should Be Paid<” when he takes a side and provides examples as a former collegiate athlete. He provides good reasons and evidence to support his view, but there is also many loopholes and questions to be asked about his argument. In “Why College athletes should be paid.” an article by Tyson Hartnett. Harnett claims that being a college athlete is just like having a job. He lays out a typical day for a college athlete and illustrates that there isn’t downtime. Inca the season starts up, athletes are unable to work their seven dollar an hour jobs. Once the season starts there is no time for worm and students do not have money to buy necessities. Harnett proposes the athletes get paid a chunk of money to cover livening ex [lenses. Harnett proposes

He claims that they make the money because of the athletes. Is this fully true? Does the director of the NCAA make one million because of the athletes in his asocial, or because he headlines a major sports organization with many PR, economical, and social responsibilities? Coaches are paid 100000 and given playoff bonuses. Is this because of the players he has or is it because he’s good at his job? Doesn’t he receive the bonus because the team he has assembled by himself has prospered? Sure there been record TV deals. But are people watching because of the players or is it because they enjoy the sport, attended the school, or cheer for the team? Besides the occasional superstar it’s usually going to be the second