Answer: No, the book didn't end in the way I thought it would. But I kind of expected there to be a twist towards the end of the book. Overall I really enjoyed reading the book. I wasn't bored at any part and it was somewhat a easy read.
Winter 2018: SOCC29 Family in the Middle East Anthony Wong 1002162072 Critical Review 2 for Week 9 There are three pieces of required readings assigned for Week 9, and the main topic is regarding gender killing and honor of crimes, but I will only focus on two articles written by Kecia Ali and Anna C. Korteweg on this critical review. Authors Kecia Ali (2003) and Anna C. Korteweg (2012) adopt somewhat distinctive views towards the issue of honor crime. Despite different opinions hold by the two authors, they do have some similar ideas in common, which is both of them consistently think that honor killing is universally unacceptable across culture.
The chapter that I want to write about is Chapter Eight: Wilma Derksen, “we have all done something dreadful in our lives, or have the urge to”. In this chapter I find the story line I quite interesting as it exemplified the current problem paced by society nowadays; crime. First of all, this chapter can be regarded as the chapter that tied most of the stories in the book including the undesirable difficulty, the inverted U-shaped concept and the principle of legitimacy. As I read the book, the topic discuss by Gladwell makes me think critically of the action taken by Mike Reynolds and Wilma Derksen. Both of them faced the same situation or what we like to called, difficulty, which is the death of their child.
1. Ethical concern. Describe and give examples of the concern. How is it pertinent to the field of criminal justice?
To start with, it can be shown that imposed during the sentencing process are 2 of them effective and ineffective in protecting the rights. For example, the case of R. v. Fernando set a record for the next generation sentencing of Aboriginal offenders. It was thought that Fernando was guilty of wounding his de facto wife. An implication of this case is massive, as it established the principles , which take reduced economic circumstances and a big loss of customer law into account when sentencing indigenous offenders. This, testifying to the of the law, in protecting the own belief of offenders.
One notable quote on moral corruption in the novel is when Raskolnikov says "I did not kill a human being, but a principle!" It highlights his moral justification for the murder and how it led to his downfall. Another quote is "By nothing but a fantastic theory that you've made up, you've taken away the life of a poor, decrepit creature, the drunken brute," it shows how the moral justification led to a terrible crime. Another quote that highlights the moral corruption is "The more I think of it, the more plainly I see that I have been a fool, that I have been duped, that I have been utterly in the dark about myself. "
As we know, there are many ways criminals can be punished. When sentencing happens, the defendant is usually sentenced to the following punishments, listed from minor to extreme: Fines Community service Diversion programs Probation GPS monitoring Jail Prison Death penalty (Rio Salado, 2022). Most of these punishments can be listed under either the utilitarian or retributive theory of punishment. The utilitarian theory seeks to punish offenders to 'deter' future wrongdoings.
(127) then the book is over and it leaves you confused on all the opportunities that may occur next and the audience is then lost. i. Refutation: The story line actually has a very basic plot, and as for the ending the author made the decision to leave you wondering. The author is smart about his ending where he plays with characters emotions towards the book which is actually a respectable technique that he uses in order to create elevated anticipation for what is to
In conclusion, the author uses the emotions that the man feels as justification for his actions, leading readers to understand why he would kill the
Sam Freeman Jr Introduction to Criminal Justice Ethics (CJUS261) Professor Umeki Ramsey Unit 1 – Discussion Board 2 November 18, 2015 Police officers sole purpose in the United States is to protect and serve the county, city municipality, and state government to ensure that the law is being upheld by everybody within them. Peace officers assume a focal part in the law authorization framework. They screen criminal movement, tune in group watches, react to crisis calls, issue tickets, make captures, examine violations and affirm in court as required. It is no secret that the United States inherited much of Great Britain governmental institutions. In the Bible, Jesus says “to whom much is given, much will be required” (Luke 12:48).
The course reading characterizes morals as an arrangement of standards of good and bad that can portray somebody who has the ability to make esteem judgments and observe right from off-base. Ethics is the control of deciding great and insidiousness and characterizing moral obligations. From what I can assemble from this, they can be utilized reciprocally, yet they are distinctive. They both identify with good and bad lead, however ethics alludes to guidelines gave by an outer source and morals alludes to an individual's own standards in regards to good and bad (Pollock, 2013, p. 6-8).
In the discussion of moral objectivism and moral relativism, it is important to understand the difference, and the impact that a moral system has on the criminal justice community. The community exists to enforce the laws. Moral judgments are made with votes, and the decisions on how laws are crafted are made by elected officials. For this reason, it makes sense for the criminal justice community to separate themselves professionally from their own moral views. Moral Relativism is the view of morality, much like beauty, is relative to the person, culture, or organization.
Crime and Punishment used great use of the Marxist Theory. While the bourgeois earned value through overpowering the lower class. This novel best embodies the Marxist Theory because it is a proclamation of a proletariat, being Raskolnikov is not is the right place in society, struggling from deep poverty and craves the fighting against the common good in society. Johnson 2 As Alyona in Crime and Punishment
Assignment #1 Review questions Chap. 1 p. 26: 1. A single standard of ethics cannot be applied to all criminal justice agencies. The world is too complex to legislate morality and ethics. The cultures that make up each part of the world are not the same.
I will be explaining through the seven elements of crime whether illegal drug use, prostitution, and gambling fit the elements (Bohm & Haley, 2011). The seven elements of the crime are harm, legality, actus reus, mens rea, causation, concurrence, and punishment. Discuss in detail whether illegal drug use, prostitution, and gambling fit the seven elements of a crime from. Include in your discussion whether these three crimes should be considered mala in se or mala prohibita.
