Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong when looking at the outcomes. It believes that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. Consequentialism is found in utilitarianism; consequentialism is largely thought about during war. When you fight for your life in war, you end up taking another person's life. While this may be good for your country, it is hurting a different country.
Whether or not to give money to a homeless man depends on one’s values. Especially if you have the money and would hardly notice it’s absence. This paper will argue whether to give money to a homeless person based on the theories of utilitarianism, Kantian ethics and virtue ethics. Utilitarianism promotes maximizing the most happiness or pleasure. Therefore, this view would give the homeless person the money.
In the movie “Do the Right Thing” it seems to me that utilitarianism is not a standard practice. Throughout the movie viewers follow Mookie, a pizza delivery boy with many connections and a family just trying to make ends meet. He is faced with several dilemmas of trying to make his boss happy or the people in his neighborhood happy, which in the end he seems to succeed neither. Utilitarianism is the ethical conduct of maximizing happiness, in “Do the Right Thing” it seems that there is no group with maximum happiness.
The film Do the Right Thing, composed, coordinated and delivered by Spike Lee, concentrates on a solitary day of the lives of racially different individuals who live and work in a lower class neighborhood in Brooklyn New York. Be that as it may, this conventional day happens on one of the most sweltering days of the mid year. The film focuses on how social class, race and the ethical choices that the characters make directly affect the way individuals interface with each other. It begins with the film's characters awakening to begin their day and peaks with an area revolt after cops too much limit and kill a youthful dark man named Radio Raheem for battling a more seasoned Italian American eatery proprietor named Sal in his pizzeria, and afterward
In my future profession I familiarize myself to the utilitarian code of ethics. This code is a situational code which means that the decision made depends on the situation on hand. Also, it relates that the best decision is where the consequences maximize happiness for the greater number. As a future medical doctor, it 's my duty to respond to my patients needs and make them feel better, make them happy. I do want to create my own practice and provide my service to my community.
A number of problems surround the second question; the most obvious of which are limited time, the limited capacity of human foresight to calculate the maximum number of happiness, and the inability of the theory to advise on the time frame utilitarianism is to be applied to; how do you know the maximum number of happiness for the next 10 years doesn’t mean greater overall unhappiness in the next 50 years, so what time period should one keep in mind when considering an issue from a utilitarian stand point, 1 year, 5 years, 10, 20? This lack of clarity further adds to the impractical nature of the ideology. There are a myriad number of situations which seem very difficult to resolve without employing utilitarian principles and a very good example is the widespread use of utilitarian principles in bioethics. The best example here would obviously be the famous case of the conjoined twins Mary and Jodie. The facts in front of the court indicated that Mary was the parasitic twin who shared a heart with Jodie.
Ethical theories are philosophical concepts put in place to help justify and evaluate the morality of human actions. These ethics are seen as fundamental principles for decent human conduct when deciding what is right and wrong. Two of the most well known ethical theories are Kantian Ethics and Utilitarianism. Kantian ethics defines morality based on an individual’s rationality and self-control (Warburton pg: 38). Where as Utilitarianism defines morality based upon the ability to express pleasure and avoid pain (Warburton pg:47) Kantian ethics is categorized as a duty-based theory (Warburton pg: 39).
Snowden had no concern for putting his co-worker and others in danger. His actions have proven that he did not consider the consequences of what his actions would have on his co-worker. Snowden stole a User ID and password from a co-worker and had no remorse for what punishment this individual may have faced. Snowden had no concern for the Americans that were undercover working for N.S.A. for this reason I do believe that Snowden was operating under the Teleological Theory; Ethical Utilitarianism. The Teleological Theory; Ethical Utilitarianism believes that their actions is right if the punishment of the action are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone.
Ethics Decision Paper from Yu Chen When I just graduated from university, I have been to a forwarding company as an intern. I am in charge of collect documents from two companies, the job is idle. A workmate to discuss with me, let me finish his part of the work that is close to the company I work for. He said that he and I can alternate the rest.
Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.
When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive utility. The founders of utilitarianism define positive utility as happiness and pleasure and consider it to be a driving force of all positive and morally right acts.
According to Schermerhorn (2015) the utilitarian viewed ethical performance to distribute the greatest good to a large number of people. John Mill a philosopher in the 19th century felt that results would evolve around the implications of right and wrong principals in terms of consequences. In an ideal business world managers are able to use various performance actions to demonstrate an understanding of business issues and desired results for their customers or organization. An example Schermerhorn (2015) mention was if a CEO was leading a company that was heading toward a financial downfall they decide to make cuts within the company. This will allow residual jobs to be saved and the company will remain profitable.
Hyejin Jang Professor Writing DED 8 April 2016. 4. 7. Kant’s ethics differs from utilitarian ethics both in its scope and in the precision with which it guides action. In The Categorical Imperative, Kant emphasizes that human autonomy is the essence of morality.
One of those most challenging areas I have experience during my current placement is ethical decision-making. We studied many possible scenarios during our Values, Ethics and Professional Issues class, and discussed the various types of decision-making models to help guide us when having to make difficult decisions. While the class was invaluable, because it helped me identify my own biases, and also shed light on how I have made decisions in the past and how I can possibly make decisions in the future, I knew that having to make real-life decisions would not be so cut and dry. This placement has been challenging for me, because my ongoing assignment with one of my supervisors requires constant ethical decision-making, sometimes even in the
Virtue ethics started drawing attention since the modern ethics exposed its limitation and reconsideration about the priority was needed. Contemporary ethics focus on “What we should do”, instead of “What kind of person we should do”. In consequence, the moral codes in modern era solely emphasizes moral duty and rules, while neglecting personality and character of individuals. Virtue ethics support the traditional criterion that consider moral virtue and personality of individuals as important. The virtue of good engineer includes creativity, good understanding of culture, morality, and capability of communication.
