CASE 1: Eli Lili 1. In the case of Eli Lili their actions are more inclined to meet the ends regardless of the means, looking at this set up we can say that their practices are utilitarian in nature, ignoring their rightful and perfect duties just to achieve results, they just want to get their desired results, the way you look at is very selfish and immoral 2. I don’t believe that there is “informed consent” it may have been voluntary but I’d like to call it blind “Volunteerism” or “Bribery” because I think Given the right conditions the people who “volunteered” would have not volunteered, the only reason they joined in the first place was that they were desperate to receive the basic needs after living in such harsh conditions anyone would’ve