More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on Julius Caesar
The tragedy of julius caesar literary analysis: shakespeare's tragic heroes
The tragedy of julius caesar character traits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Logically, it makes sense; this is precisely the reason Antony employs logos. At last, Antony reveals the true intention of his speech: “I wrong the honorable men / whose daggers have stabb’d Caesar; I do fear” (3.2.151-152). Antony speaks, not only in remembrance of Caesar but in vengeance of his death, too. After strategically using repetition to call Brutus honorable and establish ethos, Antony implements sarcasm to turn the tide of his speech. He now highlights just how “honorable” Brutus and his men are.
Fourth, logos was also used in Julius Caesar. Shakespeare writes “he was ambitious, I slew him (III, ii, 25-26) Brutus seeks to demonstrate that the assassination was planned action based oh that fact it would have been good of Rome. Before the citizens were cheering Caesar now Brutus.
You have forgot the will I told you of.” (3.2.119) By asking the question and answering, he’s establishing a right and wrong side, his side being right. Brutus, however, also does a good job of establishing logos, by showing the people what is the effect of Caesar’s death. “Here comes his body, mourned by Mark Antony, who, though he had no hand in his death, shall receive the benefit of his dying, a place in the commonwealth, as which of you shall not? With this I depart, that, as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome,” (3.2.113) When Brutus states what they’re receiving the benefits of his death, he’s also saying that Julius living would be negative, essentially telling them they should be happy that he’s dead.
Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he is ambitious." (III.ii.105-107) Antony rebukes this statement in explaining that if was indeed an ambitious man, he would have instantly taken the crown. This was not the case since at the public square, Caesar had refused the crown three times. Antony with the use of logos, obtained the upper hand in this point over
Brutus says Caesar is ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man, but was Caesar really that ambitious? The speaker, Marc Antony, is trying to convince all the people of Rome into liking him more than the people that killed Caesar. Marc Antony uses many rhetorical analysis tactics to do this. In Marc Antony’s speech, he uses forms of rhetorical analysis, such as pathos, ethos, and logos, to help persuade the people of Rome to go against his conspirators. At the start of his speech, Marc Antony begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen lend me your ears."
Had Antony condemned the conspirators and defended Caesar's actions, the Roman people would never have believed in his credibility and would not put weight in anything he said. The decision to subtly chip away at the crowd’s trust in Brutus and Cassius is a clever use of ethos on Antony’s part, as he is able to build up his reputation while bringing down that of the conspirators’. After showing the crowd that he can be trusted, Antony begins to use logos to deconstruct the hateful image of Caesar that the conspirators have put into the minds of the people of Rome. He tells the crowd how, “When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept,” which appealed to the fact that the crowd was composed of primarily the lower class.
For instance, Antony proves Brutus wrong by providing examples of when Caesar showed he was not ambitious. Antony looks back on when “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept;” (3.2.88-91). Here, Antony uses logos by giving direct reasons to why Brutus’s accusations of Caesar being ambitious are wrong, further displaying Brutus and the conspirators’ wrongdoings.
In the play, Mark Antony is seen attending the great Julius Caesar’s funeral along with the Romans. After finding out the conspirators murdered his noble friend, Julius Caesar, he attempts to sway the crowd without the conspirators noticing. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Shakespeare uses logos, pathos, and irony to persuade the Romans to acknowledge that Caesar was honorable. Firstly, Shakespeare relies upon logos in order to persuade the Romans that Caesar was honorable.
With this quote, Antony is referring to how Caesar was presented with a crown but refused. Antony says this to make Caesar look unselfish and that he only has the best intentions for Rome. Antony successfully uses Logos to persuade the
“My heart is in a coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause until it returns to me” (Crowther 51). Antony uses Logos to claim that he will not speak anything but the truth while talking to the crowd. “I am not here to disprove what Brutus has said, but to say what I know” (Crowther
Now the difference between the use of rhetorical questions in these speeches is that Antony's was used effectively, he worded it in such a way that stirred feelings as well as made them think. Brutus, on the other hand, only appealed to logic and talking to the citizens in such a way that almost offended them. Brutus says “Who is here so Vile that will not love his country?”. This is a rhetorical question that is weak because it is offending people in a way of making them feel bad if they don't love Rome with a burning passion. This isn't effective because the only thing this could do is make the romans feel as if they are being attacked.
The Jim Crow Laws were sadly an unbelieve event that took place in the 1800’s of American history. These laws targeted African American males, giving literary test and asking unreasonable questions about the U.S.A that many white males couldn't even answer, to many not able to read nor write causing many black males “unable” to vote. The Crow Laws also made segregation legal such as, white and black only schools and movie theaters. White schools, movie theaters, and etc,.. where far better than the African American builds which were often run down or poorly funded. You may think to yourself that it was so far back that in today's culture, those laws do not have any effect anymore, However you might be wrong.
At the funeral, both of Caesar’s friends, Brutus and Antony, made a speech. In Brutus’s speech he was very concise and was saying that he did it all for Rome. Brutus used logos and ethos in his speech. To fortify his speech, he used logos which is logic and reason. In his speech, he says listen to my reasons and he goes onto his reasons that Caesar would have become ambitious and enslaved them all.
The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”
During the stock market crash in the beginning of the mid millennium, there was a pattern set through all the years of its existence. This pattern was assumed stable and irrevocable. As a matter of fact this pattern was considered foundational. However, there is nothing wrong with believing in a pattern as long as one is prepared for the worst. The expectation of everyone involved proved to be misleading, and unfortunately all who followed along the trail were effected by this misfortune.
