Euthanasia is known to be one of the most arguable issues facing society today. Euthanasia is a process classified as suicide in which one helps another take their own life. This process only occurs when an individual may be suffering from a serious disabling illness that takes away the quality of life, therefore ending life to relieve constant suffering. There are two main classifications on euthanasia; voluntary euthanasia and involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is the voluntary decision of a patient where the doctor takes away their life. Involuntary euthanasia is the decision made by family or friends to end the patient's life. Positive law is known as the intellectual movement emphasized on the logical analysis of philosophical problems. The law was established by the head of the state and for the good of the state as a whole. Positive law has …show more content…
Krant argued that we must be doing things out of moral duty. You must make sure that euthanasia is the right thing to do out of rational duty instead of it consisting of an emotional reason or passion. Krant also agreed with John Locke, believing that us being humans is a huge gift that we should value. If you have a good life or not, the fact that we remain has enough value itself. Krant used this to prove the meaning that we should not end our lives just because it may seem like the right thing to do. In Krant's viewpoint suicide expressed an action that violates moral responsibility. Regardless of the situation one may be in, Krant believed euthanasia is wrong and comes in between the fundamental value of human