Euthanasia is packed with both advantages and disadvantages although religion can interfere with the opinions. Generally speaking this method of suicide can be very good as the patient would not like to proceed with life due to old age or crucial illness.
For example, a disabled individual have the highest probability of have a status of “not worth living”. A person that has been paralysed or not being able to live to their full potential not serving a purpose for the proceeding of their lives would most likely be involved with the procedure of being injected with the lethal injection.
Another reason why this method is a reasonable choice is because without it, the life-support machine would be the only option in most cases which is very
…show more content…
To elaborate how euthanasia can affect the public’s views, there are polls which have taken place to obtain public opinions which is evidence that proves this topic can alter perspectives. Since the 1980’s till date the feedback has been weighing in on one side of the moral action that is an option to take place.
For example overtime the data for people who think a hopeless patient with no chance of recovery should be allowed for a lethal dose is increasing as people have been introduced to the benefits euthanasia can have. Additionally overtime safer methods/dosage of the substance have been introduced providing a safer death and higher satisfaction of friends and families. Statistics show that the percentage for those who favour euthanasia has went from 50% to 80% according to www.life.org
Question ‘When a person has a disease that cannot be cured, do you think doctors should be allowed by law to end the patient's life by some painless means if the patient and his family request it? ‘This question had a total of 69% of those who said yes whilst 29% said