ipl-logo

Euthyphro: Plato's Argument

272 Words2 Pages
In Euthyphro, Plato’s method of arguing obliviously proves the point that evidence and a clear thought out explanation is needed when trying to describe and explain the difference between two things—especially when involving right and wrong. Although it helps to prove it and make you truly think about the definitions as well as how to describe it, for the person, in this case Euthyphro, on the other side of the argument it can be very annoying; because you explain one thing and then are questioned and have to explain more or then you being to questioned on your own thinking making you have to restart. It is in a way similar to now how little kids go through a phase were they ask “why” to anything and everything; typically the one being questioned
Show More
Related
529 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates’ position towards the authorities was inconsistent in The Euthyphro and The Crito. He questioned the authority in The Euthyphro but defended and obeyed it in The Crito. In The Euthyphro, Socrates had a dialog with Euthyphro who claimed to be an expert on the subjects such as holiness, Gods, piety, justice, etc. Socrates began his philosophical debate by asking Euthyphro to define piety and impiety.

Read More
1310 Words | 6 Pages

The technique that Socrates has utilized is known as rationalization. It comprises of pointing out the irregularities and self-inconsistencies

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

Excerpt From Phaedo Reading Essay Analyze: Socrates begins by explaining the opposites of things that are physical and nonphysical to his student. He begins with several examples such as saying asking his student that is it true that all opposites are produced of its own opposite in which the student agrees with. He goes on to give more examples saying, “good and evil”, “just and unjust”, etc. He then continues his phrases with many more examples of how opposites are generated from itself in order for it to be true. Near the end of the passage we see Socrates delves into the opposition of life and death.

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

HUM2225 Dr. Hotchkiss September 30, 2016 Moral Insight Plato’s Euthyphro is based on a lesson between Socrates and Euthyphro outside of the Athenian court about the definition of pious or impious. Euthyphro was surprised to see Socrates there and even more curious to find out why he was there. Socrates explained that the court was persecuting him for impiety because Meletus was spreading rumors about him corrupting the Athenian youth. Euthyphro explains to Socrates that he was there to prosecute his father for murdering a farm worker named Dionysus.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

5. Euripides half answers this question. By stating in lines 16`469-1414 JASON O Zeus, do you hear how I'm being driven off, what I must endure from this child killer, this she lion, this abomination? But I'll use the strength I have for grieving and praying to the gods to bear witness [1410] how you have killed my children and refuse to let me hold their bodies or bury them.

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

In the dialogue of “Crito,” written by Plato, Socrates and Crito are in a situation where they are debating if Socrates should stay in jail or escape jail. Crito believes that Socrates should escape jail because if he does not, he would be betraying his children. Crito supports his argument by also explaining that the government was wrong about putting Socrates in jail and he should therefore, escape. Socrates considers Crito’s argument but then states that he shall stay in jail, for it is his purpose of obeying the government. Socrates explains his reasonings by creating imaginary conversations of having a talk with the jury.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

Persuasion from ethos establishes the speaker 's or writer 's good character. As you saw in the opening of Plato 's Phaedrus, the Greeks established a sense of ethos by a family 's reputation in the community. Our current culture in many ways denies us the use of family ethos as sons and daughters must move out of the community to find jobs or parents feel they must sell the family home to join a retirement community apart from the community of their lives ' works. The appeal from a person 's acknowledged life contributions within a community has moved from the stability of the family hearth to the mobility of the shiny car. Without the ethos of the good name and handshake, current forms of cultural ethos often fall to puffed-up resumes and other papers.

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The final argument of Plato’s Phaedo was created to prove souls cannot perish. Plato does so by arguing how a soul cannot die nor cease to exist on the same fundamental grounds of how the number three can never be even. For the number three holds the essence of being odd, without being odd entirely. Similarly, a soul holds the essence of life through immortality, however the soul is not immortal itself and only participates in immortality, just as the number three participates in being odd. Additionally, an essence or form cannot admit to the opposite of itself just as small cannot be large simultaneously, and hot cannot be cold.

Read More
3507 Words | 15 Pages

Tianci Wang (300112921) Final Exam Essay PHI 3375A Prof. F.J. Gonzalez April 25th, 2023 In Plato's dialogue "Theaetetus," Socrates attempts to define knowledge and distinguish it from mere opinion. Socrates makes several failed attempts to explain false opinions. First, Socrates proposes "about all things, together or individually, that we must either know them or not know them" (188a). There are three possibilities on this basis.

Read More
1736 Words | 7 Pages

After Euthyphro fails to make his point, he rushes off in frustration. Euthyphro is a great example of a person who is unwilling to hear the truth, even if his own explanation fails miserably. According, to Irwin this is not a true philosopher because he was unwilling to shift his beliefs to hear someone else’s valid

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Continuing off of those points, Plato has an argument that cities come to be certain ways because of the ways that the people are as I mentioned before and if that’s true then there must be as many kinds of people as there are kind of cities. Therefore, there are as many kinds of people as there are kinds of cities. This is where I have a problem with Plato’s argument. I believe that even if cities have their characteristics because of the type of people that live in them, the number of kinds of cities don’t add up to the number of kinds of people. Cities can have mixtures of people.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

According to history, some have claimed that Thucydides makes empirical claims and that Plato makes normative claims. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to identify the different philosophy between Thucydides versus Plato on the Nature of the Good Life. Consequently, reaching a better understanding specifically on empirical and normative claims. As a result, the outcome should illustrate a detailed explanation on such claims with supported evince. Plato indeed advocated normative thinking;

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

Eric A. Havelock’s Preface to Plato is exceeded by the enjoyment in brings in reading only by the logical and cohesive argument that is being advanced. The prompt for this paper is to “discuss what you believe to be the most important single contribution” of this amazing book. Although there are many ideas that could feasibly be seen as meeting this requirement, however, all of these claims feed in to the central claim of the book and what I believe is the only logical response to this prompt. Havelock’s central claim is that Plato believed that poetics had no value in the Academy because it was uncritical, subjective and a simple memory aid.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

In Plato’s, Phaedo, one of the arguments that Socrates makes for justifying his theory about the soul being immortal is the argument of opposites. The argument of opposites is found from 70c to 72c in the Phaedo. The argument is not logically valid as there are a few fallacies that occur with the definition of opposites with which Socrates defines his argument. This argument ultimately fails at being logically valid as contrary to premise 1, all things that have an opposite do not come from only their opposites. Socrates also does not specify in this argument whether he is referring to the soul dying or the body dying in the final premises.

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

Analysis of Zeus’ Interaction with Prometheus in Hesiod’s Theogony and Aeschylus’ Prometheus Bound Hesiod’s

Read More

More about Euthyphro: Plato's Argument

Related Topics

Open Document