More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of Plato and Aristotle philosophy
Comparison of Plato and Aristotle philosophy
Ethics and socrates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He does as such for a few reasons. In any case, he doesn't trust that one's obligation toward a perfect being ought to be viewed as something that is partitioned and particular from his obligation toward his kindred men. In actuality, he holds that the main genuine method for rendering administration to God comprises in doing what one can to advance the good and otherworldly improvement of people. Second, Socrates respects the reason and capacity of religion as something that is unique in relation to the view communicated by Euthyphro. Rather than religion being utilized as a sort of hardware or gadget for getting what one needs, as was valid for Euthyphro's situation, Socrates trusts the basic role of genuine religion is to carry one's own life into amicability with the will of God.
Euthyphro tries to explain him that he was doing the same as Zeus did to his father and therefore being pious. But Socrates argues that it is just an example and not an explanation. He tries again and says what gods like is pious and what they dislike is not. But Socrates points out the fallacy in that argument that one god might not agree with another to which he replies in his third attempt what all gods like is pious and what they all hate is impious. Here, in this example we can see that how he searches for a concrete and complete definition for being pious.
Socrates dissatisfied with this definition begins to push Euthyphro to think on his argument of pious and impious rather than an example. Taken back from what Socrates has just told him that he attempts to define pious but instead proposes the possibilities of pious, not a definition. Socrates explained to Euthyphro that the correct definition would help him argue against Meletus’ charges of impiety. He attempts to answer Socrates’ question once more by stating that pious is a form of
Socrates asks him to explain the meaning of such a word. Euthyphro first, tells him that “is what he is doing.” But, Socrates replies to him that he wants the meaning and not an example of a pious action. In response to Socrates’ questioning, Euthyphro’s defines piety as “what is dear to the gods” (7a) or
Euthyphro finds this to be correct because of the wrong and/or criminal act that is present in the set conflict involving his father with the other worker when he tied him up and left him to die; he thinks this was an unholy act and with this act in should be punished through consequence. Socrates disregarded this definition for he didn’t ask Euthyphro to give him ‘one or two pieties but the form itself that makes all pious actions pious and all Impious are impious threw one form.” (pg.4) with this quote Socrates is saying that Euthyphro said that what he is doing is of piety and that all those involved would also be termed
In the first dialogue, Euthyphro, Socrates questions what is the true meaning of piety, to
The second, Socrates asks Euthyphro, have you known what a piety is if your attitude is confident that you indict your father for a crime. (Plato (1997), p.77.). Socrates tries to look for one standard definition of piety. Let, have a look at what piety means to Euthyphro. He comes up with the several suggestions about piety: “to prosecute a wrongdoer is pious and not to prosecute is impious”; “what all the gods hate is impious, and what they all love is pious”; “where there is piety there is also justice” (Plato (1997), p.88.).
Plato’s Apology- In Plato’s apology, Socrates is being tried for impiety against the gods. He attempts to prove to the jury of his peers that his devotion to philosophy is not meant to disprove the existence of the gods, but to piously follow them by bettering himself and all others around him. 9. Nicomachean Ethics, Book 1-
In book five, Plato addresses the people of Athens in regards to the honour of a man, the sins of a man and the rewards of man. While reading it I found it interesting that Plato did not only condemn the people of Athens but criticized the way they lived and ruled. For instance he states “Now in every man there are two parts: the better and superior, which rules, and the worse and inferior, which serves; and the ruling part of him is always to be preferred to the subject”(Book V). This quote for the book sets the tone for the whole passage because he is quick to distinguish that in every man there are two different parts. I found this most particularly interesting because he says the ruling part of the man prefers to be a slave.
In life there are many misconceptions, people look at something and automatically make a mental note of what it is and what they think about it. Whether they are correct or not an opinion has been formed, and in order to find the truth, they must be willing to open their mind to all possibilities. Not everyone will be willing to change their opinion on something so it ultimately comes down to convincing them of your theory or changing your ways. In the stories The Allegory of the Cave by Plato and Black Men and Public Space by Brent Staples, you will see how the individual deals with people’s misconceptions about themselves.
Socrates is a grotesque man who uses conundrums to confuse the youth, as well as the general public. Since childhood we have been taught about the hatred our great leaders have for Socrates. When questioned about his belief in the gods, Socrates unconvincingly uses riddles in attempt to prove that he is not an atheist. I am also concerned that Socrates claims to articulate with daimonians in contrast to the gods. The people of Athens believe in the gods; the views of this ghastly man cause misfortune to the rest of us because he alleges to be a gift from god.
There are countless myths where the gods have raped, stolen, been envious, or have been just plain deplorable. Socrates idea of a god is a being that has transcended all human behavior and reason. The Greek gods were at best, super powered and gifted human beings. Socrates’ thought was if they taught the traditional myths to the children that will grow up to become the Guardians then the Guardians will come to understand that lying, raping, and being envious are acceptable. As far as Plato is concerned, the Guardians were to know better than what the super powered humans did.
Socrates and Athenian Democracy The Apology of Socrates, as told by Plato, is an essay including Socrates’ speech that he made to a jury while trying to “convince his fellow citizens of his innocence” (Lualdi 62). Socrates was attempting to make the Athenian assembly see the world from his own perspective, as he recounts stories of going to ones who have “reputation[s] of wisdom and [observing]” them (Lualdi 63). He explains his outlook on the world, which therefore explains his actions and teachings. He also comments on Athenian democracy while doing so, pointing out that in his way of thinking, he believes “the word of God… ought to be considered first” (Lualdi 64).
Socrates’s official new charge “asserts that Socrates does injustice by corrupting the young, and by not believing in the gods in whom the city believes, but in other daimonia that are novel” (24b, p. 73). By looking deeper into the dialogue of The Apology and Euthyphro, one can see how passionately Socrates strives to express to the Athenian people his innocence in teaching the youth and worshiping of the gods. Socrates maintains his innocence in teaching the youth for three reasons. Primarily, there is no proof or evidence from past examples in which Socrates has taught the youth because no one has come out and said so. Socrates brings up a valid point that his so-called ‘teachings’ haven’t changed over time and therefore if he is accused
The dialogue, "Euthyphro" by Plato discusses what is considered
