More handpicked essays just for you.
Critiques to milgram's experiment
Milgram's experiment and the situation
Milgram's experiment and the situation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Among multiple issues including giving misleading information, the most dominate is the lack of consent Milgram received from his subjects to participate in such a test (102). While I do see that this is immoral, there is no way that Milgram could have completed his experiments effectively if he had done it morally. The first issue is if he explains what is actually going to happen during the experiments, that would obviously hurt the integrity of his results. Also, going back to how the experiments help us, if those who participated knew what was going to happen, it wouldn’t have affected them as severely. It was the shock that the experiment gave that brought their life choices into question.
Slater references Daniel Goldhagen who argues that “‘His obedience theories just don’t apply,”’ and that Milgram’s experiments don’t include any time to consider their actions, unlike the real world (56). Milgram forced his subjects into an unrealistic position. If the subjects had been given time to think about what was happening and choose the best action, I am confident that nearly every subject would have held their hand. Slater even says that the experiment had subjects in hysteria to the point of “…strangled hee-haws and belly-aching bursts,” (44). This just shows how unrealistic of a scenario Milgram had created.
This concept sparked a curiosity in psychologist Stanley Milgram to discover how authoritative figures influence a person's decision making---which soon led him to conduct his most famous experiments known today. After watching Nazi generals, one after the other, plead they were only following orders during the Nuremberg trials he took away one main concept; people can, and will blindly follow authority. To test this idea,
This Milgram research on respect to authority figures was a series of cultural science experiments conducted by Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram in 1961. They assessed the willingness of survey participants, men from a different variety of jobs with varying degrees of training, to obey the authority figure who taught them to do acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to think that they were helping an unrelated research, in which they had to distribute electrical shocks to the individual. These fake electrical shocks gradually increased to grades that could have been deadly had they been true. McLeod's article about the Milgram experiment exposed the fact that a high percentage of ordinary people will
Another thing, the Milgram obedience study as where they picked a group of people and they paired them by two types “teacher” or “student”. The things they did in this study were worse that the Zimbardo prison study because the student had to be shocked. The student had to learn for example a list of vocabulary words if they did not learn them they would get shocked with electricity. They would do several rounds to see if they learned and they electricity shock would go up to 450 volts (that is like getting hit by lighting). I learned also about the famous Phineas Gage.
The Milgram Obedience Experiment Logan Pratts Mount Saint Michael Academy Advanced Psychology Ms. Johnson February 26, 2023 Throughout human history, the world has gone through many eras of different leaders. Leaders such as Alexander the Great, Basil II, and Napoleon Bonaparte were all successful because of their tactics and their ability to fully utilize the capabilities of their subordinates. The authority that people of power have allows others to be used as tools, but how far does authority go? Think back to Nazi Germany, many German soldiers knew of the atrocities that Hitler incited, but they all continued to follow orders. The reason why many people continue to follow orders even if they bring harm to others is the fear
However, although the ingroup-outgroup differentiation and the role of fear are largely applicable to many perpetrator groups in the Holocaust, there are some aspects of the killings were the account falters. Although the Jews were seen as the chief enemy by the Nazis, there were many outgroups that began to take form. They persecuted Romani people, Slavs, people with disabilities, lesbians and gays as well as political enemies, particularly Communists. For example, under the SS Totenkopfverbdn, they enforced labour as a way of inscribing political identity. The Guards would often reserve the hardest labour for those whose policies were on the far left.
The Milgram experiment and the society Speaking of one of the most renowned psychological experiment, which even replications on TV are done, is the Milgram experiment, on obedience to authority figures. It involves the measurement of how much participants will to obey the authority, in order to explain the reason why soldiers obeyed to allow the Holocaust, the homicides of millions of Jews, happened. With the participants’ roles as a teacher to punish a learner by incrementing degrees of electric shocks, though they didn’t know it’s staged, 65% of them did it to the last under the horrendous moans and the commands of the experimenters, which surpassed the expectation of 1.2%. Milgram himself elaborated two theories, encompassing theory of
The Milgram’s experiment film, is a social obedience and human interaction with authority figures and conformity. The experiment involved placing an individual in a situation in which they would be forced to choose either to obey or disobey commands given by an authoritative person that were contrary to their own morals. The prisoners were to remain unnamed and only referred to themselves and others by their ID number. As an additional for shaving their heads, the prisoners were forced to wear a stocking cap. The film was very sad and emotional to watch how these people/ student actors was treated and how could they do a such thing like this.
In Book I of Plato’s Republic the famed philosopher Socrate debates with a trio of characters the very definition of justice and what it means to be just. The last to present his ideas of the three, Thrasymachus argues that justice is the interest of the strongest party, and that the weak can do right by serving the interest of said party. In essence, Thrasymachus proclaims that the lifestyle of the unjust is far more profitable than the lifestyle of the just, so long as one can get away with being unjust. In the reality painted by Thrasymachus, tyranny takes the place of democracy, as the individual who is not weak must see government as an obstacle to their rise to power and accumulation of wealth. The weak are then destined to be ruled over
The obedience experiments of Stanley Milgram can tell sociologists about the human tendency to obey immoral orders. This explains how atrocities, such as the Holocaust, come about and augment to the extent that they do. Furthermore, the Milgram experiment can be connected to how anti-authoritarianism is viewed as a detriment or sickness in the United States, as well as how people in the United States can actually be more prone to obey illegitimate authority than those who already reside in oppressive, authoritarian countries. Milgram aimed to prove the common belief that the cause of acts of atrocity is not necessarily because those perpetrators are innately unprincipled but that these historical tragedies are more so the result of following
The Milgram Experiment was an investigation that tested the average person’s trust in authority. The results showed that many people still listen to the researcher in the study even when faced with thoughts of hurting a person. Still this study was made in a different time so new researchers decided redo it for this generation. Yet, results were the sae. What does this mean?
(Russell 2014) Conclusion: Despite controversy Milgram’s experiment was ground breaking. It remains relevant today and is frequently cited in demonstrating the perils of obedience.
As a society, people who hard to say “NO” and have to obedience to the authority because of the status, public response and consistence. By persuaded to change one’s attitudes; for example, at home, school and work that people should obey with different one’s requests in every situation. In Gibson and Haritos-Fatouros (1986) research, the procedures used the foot-in-the-door phenomena try to persuade and indoctrinate Greek military police to invade their mind. Based on continuous training, no matter what the order is good or bad the police mind become reasonable since they have a strong, clear and extreme attitudes The police need to listen to the leader and follow their order. Due to Milgram’s Obedience experiments, when people need to obey
Name : Muhammed Irshad Madonna ID : 250509 Subject : Medical Ethics Due Date : 8/01/2018 Paper : 1-The Milgram Experiment The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a famous study about obedience in psychology which has been carried out by a Psychologist at the Yale University named, Stanley Milgram. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. In July 1961 the experiment was started for researching that how long a person can harm another person by obeying an instructor.
