ipl-logo

Evidence In 12 Angry Men

1144 Words5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men The film “Twelve Angry Men” takes place in a jury room during 1957. There is a murder case of a boy getting accused of killing his father. All the evidence makes it obvious that the boy is in fault, but it’s up to the jury, the twelve men, to decide the final verdict. If decided guilty, the boy will be put on death penalty. Eleven men immediately vote that the 18 year old is guilty, but one man votes the boy not guilty in order to give the boy a chance. By the end of the film, the man who provides the voice of reason had gradually won over all of the men’s votes. The group exhibits effectiveness throughout the film, because a young boy’s life is on the line, and they must be cautious of the strenuous evidence provided. …show more content…

Step 1, he identifies that the problem is the evidence. Step 2, he creates reasonable doubts as to why he is questioning the evidence. Step 3, he generates possible solutions for why the evidence may be wrong. Step 4, he analyzes the evidence given with his solutions. Step 5, he selects the best solutions that are the most logical. Step 6, after all agreeing that juror 8’s reasons were accurate, they all came to a conclusion that the boy was not guilty. Although the group struggled to agree, they handled their conflict well, letting each person share their opinions and thoughts on the matter. The conflict escalators were unfulfilled needs because each person felt the need to give their opinions and be open. In the beginning, most of the jurors who voted guilty acted on false evidence and refused to believe juror 8. That was until he began stating facts that could be proven, and that made everyone critically think. The overall conflict style used throughout the film was the assertive style. It may have appeared at some points that the men were …show more content…

They were interacting face to face with each other and discussing all the facts that they had, sharing different views, and discussing the case. The type of group the 12 jurors were is a problem-solving group as they had a situation and they had to work together to come to an agreement. Culture makes an impact in the group because, everyone has their own beliefs. Most of the men have their own way of viewing, perceiving, and behaving. It’s really difficult for most people to agree on certain things especially when they are close minded and what they believe is ultimately what they think is right. So, in the film at the end all the juror’s came to a conclusion that the boy was innocent even after their own

Show More
Related

Not Guilty In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

576 Words | 3 Pages

The 8th juror stood up for the boy and believed he should at least deserve a chance. Through many hours of arguments and disputes, all jurors came to a decision. The defendant is not guilty. In the beginning of the book, eleven out of the twelve jurors voted guilty.

Read More

Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men

1964 Words | 8 Pages

What is worth our attention in this movie is how in the beginning they are trying to convince each other to vote guilty. 11 juror voted guilty and only one voted not guilty. Their judgments were based upon either their past personal experience which created their thoughts and behavior or upon facts. Juror 8 represents the conscience. He stood up for his inner feelings that the accused young boy is innocent.

Read More

Analysis Of Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

747 Words | 3 Pages

Based on the evidence gathered from the case everyone agrees the boy is innocent except one man, juror three. He eventually breaks down and consequently tells the truth. The viewers can tell that this movie/play is full of emotions. Each of these emotions can be described as something more than what comes to the eye.

Read More

Group Roles: Following Group Process Observing

777 Words | 4 Pages

They think this is going to be a slam dunk of a case and that this child is guilty plain and simple. That is all except for Juror number eight. He's the only supporting in favor of the young man that is on trial. After the second vote do we then see that Juror number nine follows the not guilty vote. He along with Juror number eight are convinced that something does not add up and that this young

Read More

12 Angry Men Masculinity

1163 Words | 5 Pages

A low-class eighteen-year-old boy is convicted of murdering his abusive father. They are the ones to decide whether or not he will get the death penalty. Initially, all but one man believes the boy is guilty. This one man demonstrates minority influence tactics by confidently holding true to his side, yet also remaining open minded. As the movie progresses, he exponentially persuades the group that there is reasonable doubt that the boy is guilty and therefore should not be charged as such.

Read More

Fallacies In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men

980 Words | 4 Pages

The jury consisted of 12 Men, young and old, from different backgrounds and cultures, with different social position, different thinking but one thing in common- none of them had

Read More

Evidence In 12 Angry Men

488 Words | 2 Pages

Twelve Angry Men “A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” In the play, Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a nineteen years old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are weak include the one of a kind knife, the old men who heard the words “I’m going to kill you!” and the woman who is in question because of her glasses. Based on these, the boy is not guilty.

Read More

Minority Influence In 12 Angry Men

1458 Words | 6 Pages

This movie is the best example of minority influence where in the earlier stage only one juror no. 8 says defendant is not guilty but in the end of the movie we see that he is able to influence all the jurors in a very logical manner which I am going to point out later so that all the jurors lastly says the defendant is not guilty. Minority influence is more likely to occur if the point of view of the minority is consistent, flexible, and appealing to the majority. The juror no. 8 doesn’t know defendant is guilty or not guilty but he has only doubt in his mind which he trying to clear during the entire film and with which he also able to clear the views of other

Read More

Examples Of Social Injustice In 12 Angry Men

803 Words | 4 Pages

This process continues throughout the course of the movie, and each juror’s biases is slowly revealed. Earlier through the movie, it is already justifiable to label juror 10 as a bigoted racist as he reveals strong racist tendencies against the defendant, stating his only reason for voting guilty is the boy’s ethnicity and background. . Another interesting aspect of this 1957 film is the “reverse prejudice” portrayed by juror

Read More

12 Angry Men Groupthink Analysis

842 Words | 4 Pages

Juror 3 was intimidating the other jurors, trying to convince them to stick with the guilty verdict. Juror 2 was guilty of self-censorship agreeing with the rest of the group to influence his decisions. The whole group began with the illusion of unanimity. According to Janis illusion of unanimity is, “the majority view and judgments are assumed to be unanimous.” (Psysr.org,

Read More

Fallacies In 12 Angry Men

1404 Words | 6 Pages

The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

Read More

Analysis Of The Film Twelve Angry Men

981 Words | 4 Pages

Davis, Juror Eight, is the main character, protagonist, and was responsible for the boy's life in this film. He is an architect who was the first to vote "not guilty". Voting that way takes a lot of courage, because all the men just want to get out of there and not

Read More

The Justice System In Twelve Angry Men

591 Words | 3 Pages

The justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision has many complications and dangers. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reiginald Rose, illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve people reaching a life-or-death decision because people are biased, they think of a jury system as an inconvenience, and many people aren’t as intelligent as others. The first reason why Reiginald illustrates dangers is because people can be biased or they can stereotype the defendant. The Jurors in Twelve Angry Men relate to this because a few of them were biased and several of them stereotyped the defendant for being from the slums. The defendant in this play was a 19 year old kid from the slums.

Read More

12 Angry Men Analysis

814 Words | 4 Pages

‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.

Read More

Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men

721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More

More about Evidence In 12 Angry Men

Open Document