We persistently interpret what goes on around us, what others do or say, events we observe, and things we read in the newspaper or see on TV. We also interpret things that have happened in the past, or which may happen in the future. In addition, we interpret our own actions, and even the physical sensations and emotional changes happening inside us. By interpreting, I mean that we draw conclusions about what we think is happening. Sometimes our interpretations are correct, but often they are wrong. This leads me to asses that satirical based news can have very detrimental effects on the person viewing it. The person viewing this ‘fake’ news has an underlying responsibility to interpret a situation at it’s truest form. There is also a responsibility …show more content…
The real purpose of satire is to attain the underlying message and use that knowledge to either further or impede your opinion. Any article of news that comes outing this day of age are subjected to immediate biases due to the growing mistrust the people of the US have against the media. However, when publications are causing hysteria with their “humor,” when it’s not recognized as satire, these satire sites and comedians are missing the mark and have lost sight of their missions to entertain; things are no longer funny in that case. The satirist work should contain some signal that prepares the viewer for the comedic perception of the piece there covering. There has to be some borderline understanding given to the viewer by the satirist to help and further the understanding of the topic there covering. Because satire is indirect it often leads the viewer to misinterpret the true meaning behind the piece. This can persuade people into believing something that isn't true. Satire is not the only way someone can misinterpret information; Advertising is a huge industry where a person is persuaded to buy the …show more content…
I think Satirical media only should reach out to an audience that appreciates the humor at face value, and then eternalize the underlying message. When a news story breaks out it’s up to the media to asses the situation properly, and feed the news accurately to the people. Satirical news is not much different it just presents the news into a different light, which can be possibly confusing and can then cause a person to misinterpret the circumstance. Regardless of the story being covered, satirical news becomes a data base for where people absorb their information. The best example of a satirist with huge influence is Thomas Nast, as written in Satire’s Brew by Brian Dunphy, “Nast was effective at eviscerating his enemy with astounding renditions and the public understood his work, connecting to the cartoon on a deeper level then they would to a speech or a written word.”(Satires Brew,64) Nast persuaded public opinion with just a picture used to depict political issues of the time. Regardless if you think that Nast had too much power