1. Caesar often describes the Gauls or their actions in ways which dehumanize them to his audience. Provide an example of this and explain with what intent, specific to that point in the text, Caesar is attempting to bias his audience. A good response will discuss the reason why Caesar employs such description at a particular juncture in his narrative and what he hopes to achieve by it rather than focusing on general reasons why he would desire that his audience perceive the Gaul’s as sub-human.
Marissa Gill Mr. McNulty G4 Mark Antony used numerous rhetorical strategies to take control of the Plebeian crowd’s minds and lead them into a furious frenzy. In the book Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony attempted to undo the idea of an ambitious Caesar that was painted in their heads by Brutus in his previous speech. Mark Antony did this in his own speech to persuade the crowd that Caesar shouldn't have been murdered and that Brutus was deceiving them for his own gain. Antony used pathos, metaphors, and repetition to prove that Caesar was a good man who loved his people, held himself to the same standards as them, and implied that the men who killed him were not honorable.
She uses this technique to draw Brutus into her demands, insisting that since she has such compelling emotions, and even "Giving [herself] a voluntary wound /Here, in the thigh for Brutus" even further showing her adoration for Brutus and her urgency to be of service to him as a wife. Antony uses an antithesis as well as a paralipsis to emphasize Caesar’s positive actions and cause the Plebians to question the conspirators' actions. While juxtaposing contrasting ideas, Antony repeats the phrase “Brutus is an honorable man” while simultaneously implying the opposite (Shakespeare 3.2.103). This contrast between Brutus' perceived honor and his act of regicide stirs doubt and begins to sway the Roman audience to see the truth behind the conspirators, especially Brutus’ true intent behind assassinating Caesar. Since Antony speaks in a tone of sarcasm but speaks favorably of Brutus on the surface, it allows Antony to create a facade to the Roman public and criticize Brutus without directly stating so, making the audience feel like they are helping Antony piece the truth
In Julius Caesar, Brutus delivered a more persuasive speech compared to Marc Antony. He uses certain rhetorical techniques to make the audience understand where he’s coming from. He uses pathos to target emotion in his feelings towards caesar. He says, ” I did love Caesar, but I loved Rome more”. His love for his best friend was not like it should be.
From a young age I was always thought to be respectful towards people. And as I grow up I’ve come to learn that when talking about respect it goes both ways. I can’t be disrespectful towards someone and expect them to be respectful towards me. Respect comes in many forms, shapes, sizes, and age. When Antony is speaking at Caesar's funeral he says “And Brutus is an honorable man”( Act-3-2) although he says Antony himself doesn’t believe it.
The murdering conspirators who violently slayed the beloved Julius Caesar are being cheered on by all of Rome, all through the clever use of rhetoric. The only logical choice Antony has before him is to fight fire with fire, and convince the crowd that he’s right, and not Brutus or his followers. Antony goes up to speak the truth about his feelings for Julius Caesar, and persuade the crowd to follow him to rise against the conspirators, without being direct. So he stands in front of the crowd and begins to earn the crowd’s trust, with ethos, demonstrate his intelligence, with logos, and pull the crowd to his side, with pathos. Without credibility, a speaker can’t truly be convincing.
The conspiracy on whether or not Brutus should have killed Caesar so he does not get crowned king versus if Brutus should decide not to kill Caesar and let him be king. There are very good suggestions pointing in both directions. As some might say Brutus should kill Caesar most would agree. If Caesar is to get crowned king he will have all the power and could be very dangerous. He needs to be killed before he gets king or he will use the power to advance himself.
Marc Antony, a character in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, uses ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the audience in his funeral speech. To establish ethos, or his credibility as a speaker, Antony reminds the audience of his close relationship with Caesar. He says, "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him" (III.ii.79). This suggests that Antony is an unbiased witness and that the audience should trust him because he has nothing to gain by speaking. Additionally, Antony establishes his ethos by reminding the audience that he was a friend of Caesar and that they should trust him because of this relationship.
Danielle Hunt Mr. Ioannidis 1st Hr. English 10B 22 May 2023 The Heart Is the Key to Persuasion In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Antony’s speech was more successful than Brutus’s at persuading the crowd because of his observation of the commoner’s intelligence level and his ability to utilize rhetoric.
Rose Bishop Mrs. Comm Honors English 10 April 26 2023 “Believe me.” In Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar,” one of the main characters presents a speech after a traumatic incident has occurred. In this speech, Antony utilizes the elements of pathos, ethos, and logos to persuade the audience in a certain way.
Worried that the crowd had been completely convinced by Brutus’s words, Antony had to persuade them to be on his side, so he began his speech by appealing to their emotions or pathos. He begins his speech by calling them “Friends, Romans, Countrymen”. Being classified as his friends, Romans, and countrymen is a compliment to most people, and appeals to their emotions by feeling as if you have a strong bond with one another. By showing them that he has a bond with them, he is showing them he is not there to change their mind, but instead to talk to them as the “friends” that they are. Later, he uses empathy by telling the crowd, “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men;”.
In the play, Julius Caesar, by Shakespeare, Brutus and Antony utilize ethos, pathos, and logos in their speeches. They do so in various ways to get the Romans on their side. Every character has their own personality that allows them to react differently to certain things. Brutus refers to his honor to vindicate himself while Antony wants to avenge the murder of Caesar. Both orators appeal to their credibility and trustworthiness to get the mob on their side.
The crowd of grieving citizens demands answers after Caesar’s brutal murder. Brutus and the conspirators commit this killing, and it is up to Marc Antony to convince the crowd of their guilt. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Antony addresses this crowd of grieving citizens with a specific goal in mind. In this compelling speech to the Roman citizens, Antony argues Brutus’ innocence by utilizing ethos, logos, and pathos, ultimately convincing the crowd to turn against the conspirators. To begin, Antony strengthens his credibility by incorporating ethos in his speech.
”(3.2 121-123) Antony wants the crowd to think that he would never do the honorable men wrong, and shows respect for them. The crowd can believe that he is trustworthy because of the things that Antony says . Also during the speech, Antony yells out to the crowd “ O masters, if I were disposed to stir Your hearts and minds to mutiny and rage,”(3.2 118-119) this makes him seem like a trustworthy and honorable person. Antony also emphasizes his self-restraint by stating that he could have easily incited the crowd to mutiny and rage but refrained from doing
Julius Caesar is possibly the most well-known Romans today. While he was not the first dictator of Rome, his consolidation of power marked the end of the Roman Republic and set the foundation of the Roman Empire. This foundation would later be utilized by Julius Caesar’s heir and adopted son, Octavian, to become the first Emperor of Rome. Many of Julius Caesar’s traits made him dangerous to his political opponents. Of these traits, his ambition, his commitment, and his fearlessness were crucial forces that allowed Caesar to amass more political power than any other Roman had before.
