More handpicked essays just for you.
Examples of doublethink in 1984 analysis
Essays on doublethink in 1984
Examples of doublethink in 1984 analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The worth one places on something is often based on how much they sacrificed to meet that desire. Thus, the sacrifices one makes determines the value they place. In 1984, by George Orwell, the protagonist Winston Smith must go against everything he has ever known in order to pursue what he desires: Freedom and Julia. 1984, takes place in a utopian society we’re every aspect of life is controlled by “Big Brother.” The story follows Winston Smith, a member of this utopian society where every action, word and thought are monitored.
By looking at the debate between Cassie and Rahim in “Factory Air,” we can see that Doublethink means saving oneself from bad circumstances, even when the common choice would be to help others, resulting in contradictory thoughts. Meanwhile, by examining Winston and O’Brien’s arguments in 1984, we see that Doublethink involves believing that everything can change as long as one’s mind accepts it, making any falsehood the truth. Comparing both stories, these definitions are similar because they show that even in the face of logical choices, one can ignore reality by convincing oneself otherwise. This similarity changes how we think about Good and Evil, revealing that these concepts can be manipulated by our minds, making them subjective rather than absolute.
In the novel 1984, outward conformity is crucial to the survival of the citizens of Oceania. One character in particular who practices this extremely well is the main character, Winston Smith. He not only conforms outwardly, but also questions his society inwardly, due to the overhanging fear that Miniluv will find and torture him. Winston constantly questions Big Brother and all of the laws that the citizens of Oceania are required to obey while also inwardly questioning his forbidden romance with Julia. Without this rising tension throughout the novel, 1984 would lose its suspenseful tone and would easily lose the focus of readers.
In the book 1984, by George Orwell, there’s some psychology that we’ve seen so far. A group of people participate in something called The Two Minutes Hate, during this the people’s behavior exemplify groupthink, which states in the text, “Before the Hate had proceeded for thirty seconds, uncontrollable exclamations of rage were breaking out from half the people in the room.” This tells us that the people are frustrated so they shout altogether, and this shows us groupthink since one person shouted, then everyone else joined in. Winston’s response is conformity by the text that states, “It was apparent that she was uttering a prayer. At this moment the entire group of people broke into a deep, slow rhythmical chant of ‘B-B! …
First of all, we should ask ourselves the question ‘’What is insanity?’’. Most people would define it as a state of being or acting irrationally or senselessly. If this definition was to apply to the society we live in today and the present values, Winston most likely would be considered as a sane person. He has the ability to think critically and does not stick to only one version, despite living in a totalitarian regime. The book is full example, as one of the main themes throughout the book is Winston’s growing desire for some sort of rebellion.
Fear and ignorance is one of the most power concepts that is represented in the book 1984. The government known as Big Brother constantly watches everyone and controls their every thought. They have the ability to put the fear of extinction into their citizens so that no one dares to act again them. But their overall advantage over its citizens is that they keep telling them that they are always at war with either Eurasia or Eastasia. The Party uses peoples ignorance and enthusiasm for war because they are always angry towards their enemies when things don’t go their way, the follow the concept that war is peace, and that the people of Oceania need war to stay in line.
In 1984 by George Orwell, all members of society will ‘willingly’ conform to the Party mindset. Some people, like Winston, are allowed to run wild for part of their lives, committing Thoughtcrime, but eventually, they will be caught and corrected. The Party ensures these enemies will see the error of their ways in order for the Party to keep power. There are no laws, but there is no free will. Though lacking written rules, Big Brother rules with an iron fist through unspoken rules that must never be broken, else even the most devoted follower risks getting taken by the Thought Police.
For example, Trump has issued a ban on immigrants entering the country whose backgrounds contain, “citizens [who] have caused the terrorism deaths of no Americans,” while on the contrary he forgets about the citizens whose country, “have caused the terrorism deaths of thousands of Americans,” which greatly shows an example of Trump utilizing doublethink. Similarly to Big Brother, President Trump is not the only one who expresses the ways of doublethink. Scott Pruitt for example, is the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, which was designed to protect the environment. Scott Pruitt spent his time to battle against the Environmental Protection Agency, especially with Obama’s plan to increase the efforts to take down global warming. But now that Scott Pruitt is nominated to lead the EPA by President Trump, he has to now devote his works to not only diminish his beliefs of global warming, but to also work as a head director of protecting the environment.
Doublethink is simultaneously holding two contradicting opinions at one time. This is a real life situation in which Winston and the reader encounter doublethink without realizing it on the surface level. Winston knows deep down how he really feels and what life could be like in his dream state, while Winston is forced to act a certain way and believe certain things in the real world. Having two contradicting beliefs, while knowing one is the better belief and choosing not to believe it for the benefit of the Party is the exact definition of
For this dystopian novel, the introduction of the story and the explanation of the conditions of it’s society is done through the description of its environment. The connection between the perception of the daytime and lesser desired circumstances help to display the premise of the environment of 1984. By associating contradicting connotations between the “shining” sun and “harsh blue” sky and colorful posters that were “plastered” (Orwell 2) everywhere, the narrator's disdain for the government's impact on the natural environment is established. The juxtaposition of the environment and its contents conceptualizes the prominent role in everyday citizens’ lives in the world of 1984. Contradictory toward the protection, safety, and organization
In 1984, George Orwell writes countless contradictions. One of the contradictions Orwell writes is “War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.” This is a slogan used by the party. At first glance, this quote may seem illogical. War and peace have two different meanings, there is no similarity between the two.
George Orwell’s novel, 1984, thoroughly outlines the aspects of dystopian society, dictated by a totalitarian government of English Socialism. This novel preludes to a meaning much deeper than what is perceived from the events of the protagonist, Winston Smith, and his acquiesce against Big Brother. In order to decipher the uprooted meaning of this text, a formalist perspective can be used to analyze the literal aspects of a novel - particularly, in accordance to tension and ambiguity within a setting. Winston Smith was soundly proficient at his job in the Ministry of Truth. The Records Department “is connected with the happenings of the story” as it is a crucial location for conflict to arise, ultimately adding to the plot of the story (Bloom, Edward.
Dystopian texts espouse a variety of didactic messages that depend significantly upon both the context and zeitgeist of the time in which they were created. Differences can be found when comparing the techniques and perspectives the authors have chosen to represent their contextual concerns to audiences. Together both Fritz Lang’s silent black and white film ‘Metropolis’ 1927 and George Orwell’s novel ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ (*referred to as 1984) 1948, confront and provoke audiences to consider the impact that (abusive power + unquestionable control= insert question statement) can have not only on the characters in these two texts, but also on the cultural and political lives of the reader and viewer. By subjugating & dehumanising the lower classes, dictators are
George Orwell’s 1984: How Doublethink is the Most Powerful Weapon for Control Being able to believe two paradoxical statements at one time sounds impossible but it is more common than believed. It is called doublethink, which is the ability to hold two contradictory beliefs on a topic and wholeheartedly believing them both at the same time. This term was coined by George Orwell and it becomes the main tool for control over the citizens of Oceania in his novel 1984. Orwell created a totalitarian future in hopes it would serve as a warning to preceding generations as to how the government can metamorphose into having complete power over a population to the point where they even control the thought process of the human mind.
In 1984, George Orwell depicts a dystopian society pervaded by government control and the obsolescence of human emotion and society. Winston is forced to confront the reality of a totalitarian rule where the residents of Oceania are manipulated to ensure absolute government control and servitude of the people. The theme of totalitarianism and dystopia is employed in 1984 to grant absolute power to the government and ensure the deference of the people through the proliferation of propaganda, the repudiation of privacy and freedom, and the eradication of human thought and values. The repudiation of privacy and independent thought and the ubiquity of government surveillance is employed to secure absolute power to the government over the populace
