More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationships of the three branches of government
Relationships of the three branches of government
The relationships of the three branches of government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Doc C they show the powers the branches use to check each other, an example is that the president can veto laws made by Congress, but Congress can override the veto. This shows that the checks and balances work to protect against tyranny by making sure every branch can cancel out the other. In Doc C they said “.the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other. [The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This quote shows how the branches were made to check and control one another in order to defend against tyranny.
One of these ways was checks and balances. Document C shows what the three branches of government can do. For example the legislative branch can veto a president's veto, can impeach a president, and can approve presidential nominations. This keeps the executive branch in check with a more powerful branch able to undo unjust laws and get rid of a bad or unjust leader. In turn the executive branch can nominate judges to the judicial branch, and can veto congressional legislation.
The legislative branch consists of the two houses of Congress that have been decided upon by the Great Compromise (the House of Representatives and the Senate). Joint together as one system, Congress has the powers to create laws, declare war, override veto, and impeach the president. Secondly, the executive branch—consisting of the president, vice president, and the Cabinet—has the power to carry out laws (approve), negotiate foreign treaties—such as alliances—, and can grant pardons for federal offers. Finally, the judicial branch, or the Supreme Court Justices can interpret laws, declare laws unconstitutional, and declare the president unconstitutional. Having three branches of government helps keep the government in check, and it prevents one branch becoming more powerful than the other branches.
In document C, there is a very useful chart that shows one way that each of the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) holds a little bit of power over the others. This is good because it means that no one part of government is above or below the others in terms of power, and there is always a way for one of them to be “checked” if they are becoming too tyrannical. For example, the President (executive) can veto Congressional legislation, but Congress (legislative) can impeach the President if necessary. Being able to “check” each other is one of the ways that the Constitution kept one group from having too much power. Another benefit of having the checks and balances system is that none of the three branches is so far apart from each that they have no power over the others, but they are far enough apart to prevent the power from accumulating.
They came up with a Check and Balance process for each branch to follow. Each of the three government branches cross-checks the others to keep things balanced and fair. For example, the Legislative Branch checks on the Executive Branch by being given the right to Impeach the president if needed, and the Executive Branch checks on the Legislative Branch by being given the right to veto the legislation if they see fit. While one branch may have the power to pass a federal law, the other two branches were given equal power to rule the law unconstitutional or veto legislation. Each branch shares some authority with another branch to ensure there is no branch with exclusive control over any of any one activity required.
There are many checks and balances placed upon each of the three government branches. These checks and balances were created to insure that each branch would have nearly equal power. In this way, no branch will be able to rise above the others in power. This system has worked very effectively over the past years, however, there have been several situations over the past years in which this system has been challenged. Leaders of the Executive branch such as William Howard Taft, or Franklin D. Roosevelt have tried to expand the power of the executive branch.
In the event that the president tries to take the force of another branch, than the legislative branch can impeach the president. This is one of the checks of the legislative branch on the Executive branch . Every branch has a check of another branch, so if one branch is doing something unconstitutional , another branch can check the unconstitutional decision , and fix the issue. This guards against one branch taking power over the other
Some examples of checks and balances is the legislature can check the power of the chief executive by overriding a President's veto. Another way is the President can check the power of the Supreme Court is by the President nominating the judges, and the Supreme Court can check the Senate by ruling laws unconstitutional. The framers of the Constitution used this as guard against tyranny by making sure the branches could keep each other in line and not letting one branch become too
In Federalist Paper #51 by James Madison it says “The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…. [The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” What this means is the founding fathers made it so each branch is able to check on the other branches making it so one branch does not become too powerful. Some examples of some of the things that the branches are able to do to check on each other are: the legislative branch can override a president's veto, the executive branch can nominate judges, and the judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional.
In document C there are the 3 branches of government and arrows pointing from one to the other telling us how each branch checks one another. Some of these are, the president can veto different laws if he does not like them, but Congress can override this veto and pass the law anyways if they have a majority vote to override it. The Courts can declare acts of either branch as unconstitutional. Congress can also impeach members of any other branch and can remove them from office. All of this means that whatever one branch does, it must go through the other two so no corrupt laws can be passed.
Each branch has different power: which balances each other out so one does not overpower one
Some examples are: The Legislative Branch; has the authority to overrule a president’s veto but requires a 2/3rd vote, they are also permitted to approve treaties and impeach a president if the cause is just. For the Executive branch, they are able to appoint federal judges for the Supreme Courts, and capable of vetoing bills from passing if he or she sees fit. For the Judicial Branch, as they are to interpret the Constitution they would be free from the influences of the executive branch in order to make sure the president him/herself is following the laws of the land. The U.S’s Checks and balances
The branches of Government When the constitution was written it was written so that no one person could have all the power of the government. The constitution wanted to make sure that all people could have the benefits of the federal government but still live with separate state laws. Because no man is immune from enticements of evil, none can be trusted and invested with limitless power. (Lapeer, RUsseell W. issue 6 p. 2).
Therefore, power has been justly distributed between each division of government. Checks and balances are yet another form of separation of powers in the government. As the Constitution was initially written, there were checks and balances preventing any one branch of becoming too powerful. Since we still follow the same Constitution (with a few amendments) those checks and balances are still used.
Love, most people would say it 's a wonderful thing, but is it worth your life? In William Shakespeare 's The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, the leading cause of Romeo and Juliet 's death was the external conflict of the two families feud with each other. The Capulet’s and the Montague 's have had a long history of being rivals. From the very first scene in the play it obvious that they have so much hatred towards each other they just fight to be fighting. ”Draw if you be men” (I.i.55) this quote really shows that the families had a huge rivalry Sampson and Abram (the ones that started the fight), weren 't even family members, they were just servants of the two families.
