ipl-logo

Liberal Optimism Essay

1251 Words6 Pages

Question 1
The first part of this essay will discuss the optimism of liberals about human progress, cooperation and peace by giving reasons and examples of that optimism. Furthermore, this paper will look at how and why liberal arguments are invalid by providing examples. The essay will further deliberate the liberal’s view on conflict and the causes thereof. The type of actors in the theoretical explanation for conflict in the international system will also be discussed.
Liberalism, along with realism, is one of the main schools of thought in international relations.According to liberals, international relations is not only controlled by the relationship between states but also includes and emphasises the role of other actors.
During WWI and …show more content…

Americans encourage free trade especially with African countries and they also provide African countries with humanitarian aid. But in return they want their natural resources like oil and other minerals. Another assumption of liberals is collective security which mainly focuses on an arrangement were individual states in the system agrees that the safety and the security of one state is the concern of all and agrees to have a collective connection in response violence or aggression. (Smith 1986, 36). An alliance system of this collective security can be disputed, and different states can join each other commonly as a reaction a specific internal or external threat. An example of this was seen during the league of nation era when an occurrence of conflict follows, affiliate member states must stop normal associations and relations with criminal state, execute sanctions and if required commit their armed militaries to the disposal of the leagues of nation council should the use of force be necessary to bring back the status quo. (Cox, Inkberry & Inoguchi 2000,

Show More
Related
348 Words | 2 Pages

As an International Relations Liberal, my answer to the Rodney King question of “Can’t we all just get along?” is a resounding yes, but with an asterisk. Realists assert that human nature is the underlying root of warfare and point to the discouraging statistics on the number of wars and their casualties. Since human nature cannot be changed, humans and their societies will always have the willingness for violence. In opposition to that view, “…Liberals believe in the possibility—perhaps even the inevitability—of human progress” (Shimko 40) Liberalists would argue that to focus solely on the rare occurrences of war ignore the larger context and distort reality to create an unfavorable view of humanity.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

Pre-Write Topic: The impact of women on political and social reforms Footprint: American Progressive Era, 1880s – 1920s Setting the Scene: The Progressive Era was a time of extensive reformation across the United States. Outline of your arguments supported by evidence: - Social change: New inventions increased jobs creating independence, altering family life and leading to protests on wage, birth control, and workplace regulations.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Liberal Party of Canada The Liberal Party of Canada and Justin Trudeau lead a fascinating campaign which advocated for “real change” and brought them from 3rd place to a shocking majority government on election day. The majority was unpredicted by the polls which is another interesting aspect of this election. Closer to election day, the Liberals were leading the polls, however none of them anticipated a majority government. This may be attributed to the Liberal Party’s extensive use of social media and online communication which lead to a larger voter turnout from the 18-30 range- which typically opt out of voting on election day.

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

Liberals Ideals constrain the policy makers to settle on balanced choices under circumstances where worldwide participation is required to anticipate worldwide emergency. The decision making process is very mind-opening in the movie. The

Read More
1668 Words | 7 Pages

States rely on the use of force to counter insurgent movements because it achieves easily measureable objectives, such as combat-related body counts and amount of territory held by each side. Rome, France, and The United States used it to varying degrees. When Rome and France used force, they withheld little. When the United States uses it, it does so to target insurgents, protect the counterinsurgent forces and the people in the insurgency’s area of operations. All three actors relied upon the use of force because they viewed it as a simple, yet narrow way to measure success after it was employed.

Read More
86 Words | 1 Pages

Knowing how the world and Americans view themselves, it is important to consider how we will fit into America’s future. Personally, my optimism for the future coincides with how most Americans were in 2013. With the recent terroristic horrors going on and the 2016 election, I am probably more pessimistic than what the public was like three years ago. There have been very few positives that has been happening in the current state of our world and all the negativity spreading around makes everything seem bleak.

Read More
1446 Words | 6 Pages

The first Liberal Internationalists, including Wilson, were a very ethnocentric, non diverse group. They had two driving questions that they wanted to have answered from their new ideology. Those questions were, how do we prevent war, and what causes war? When analyzing these questions, liberal internationalists focused on both the domestic and international level. When examined at the domestic level, Liberal Internationalists concluded that illiberal, nondemocratic regimes are to blame for wars, and the only way to prevent wars was by allowing nations self determination through democracy.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

Carl Schmitt’s claim that politics is fundamentally distinct from other spheres is persuasive on the premise that the core of politics consists on the friend/enemy theory with each side of the conflict posing a perceived existential threat of violence to one another. However, his argument is less persuasive when he uses this premise to critique liberalism because he does not provide an alternative solution to his criticism. Schmitt contends that, “the political must rest on its own ultimate distinction, [and] the specific political distinction to which political actions and motives can be reduced is between friend and enemy” (Schmitt 26). Schmitt defines a political or public enemy as a collective group that poses an existential threat of violence, “the real possibility of physical killing” (Schmitt 33).

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

"Now let 's set the record straight. There 's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there 's only one guaranteed way you can have peace—and you can have it in the next second—surrender. Admittedly, there 's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face—that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand—the ultimatum.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

The Conservative party led by Stephen Harper has been in power for the last nine years. It is time for a real change so, I would vote for the Liberals. The Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau has promised to better the lives of the middle class families, reform our immigration system and will involved in climate to the benefit of all Canadians. Under the liberals, the present 22% tax rate for annual income between 44,701 and 89,401 will be cut down to 20.5%. A new tax bracket f 33% will be imposed on those with taxable income over 200,000 a year 29% tax will be imposed for those earning below 138,000 and 200,000.Justin Trudeau said “we can do more for the people who need it, by doing less for the people who don’t”.

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

Serageldin (1995) stipulated that, “there are several issues that are related to foreign aid, which generated a body of literature” (1995:13). These issues can be divided into two broad groups: the motivation for aid and the effectiveness of aid in achieving greater welfare for people in the recipient country. The inspiration driving guide has ranged from altruism to the quest for national goals, for example, national security and business advantages (Eaton, 1989; Browne, 1999: 1).

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

The world in which Carr knew and wrote this book about may have change greatly, however I think one can say the world is once again experiencing s transitional moment where answers no longer suffice, and affirming this books continued relevance. To conclude, the book shows us how Carr was convinced the realities of Global Power and not Utopians normative morality would shape a new international order. Carr’s work can be understood as a critique of Liberalism internationalism or what he referred to as

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

4.0 An Explanation of Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism and Post-Structuralism. 4.1 Realism Realism or political realism prioritizes national interests and security concerns in addition to moral ideology and social reconstruction. The term is often associated with political power. The term is often associated with political power. Realism believes that the state is the main actor of the most important in determining the direction of a country.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Liberalism vs realism approach Introduction Liberalism is a political reasoning or perspective established on thoughts of freedom and balance. The effect of these thoughts relentlessly expanded amid the seventeenth century in England, coming full circle in the glorious revolution of 1688 which revered parliamentary sway and the privilege of revolution, and prompted to the foundation of what many consider the principal current liberal state. In maintaining that people are naturally equal, liberals assume that they all possess the same right to liberty, One of the best liberal triumphs included supplanting the whimsical way of royalist and absolutist manage with a basic leadership handle encoded in composed law.

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

Read More

More about Liberal Optimism Essay

Related Topics

Open Document