ipl-logo

Similarities Between Realism And Liberalism

1938 Words8 Pages

The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories.
Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism:
Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military …show more content…

Also, Realism ideas believe that state would act according to their own ideas and needs when Liberalism believes that state would act according to citizens ideas and needs. Realism believes in conflicts, aggression, militaristic expansions and Liberalism believes in measuring of power trough countries economy, in the cooperation and peace, in the nation/people`s rights and in ideas of political and nations/peoples freedom. Also, Realism believes that United Nation is pointless because organization cant keeps another state what it wants for example: (Russian annexation of Crimea and Russian occupation in Georgia) but actually Liberalism believes that United Nations can`t force states to obey the organization, but Liberals think that UN is still important in our reality. Liberalism just believes that international organizations like United Nations, give states the ways in which to cooperate with each other and to gain one another's trust. Also Realists argue that all states have same interests and all countries are interested in increasing …show more content…

Liberalism also shares the idea with realism to use military power to get what they want or need, also military power can be used if other country threatening or bully on the own liberal state. But theoretically liberalism is the theory of peace and development and believes in measuring power through economy, liberal ideas such as freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, gender equality, international cooperation, freedom of speech and press, when with the other hand realism believes in ideas such as conflicts, aggression, militaristic expansions and also they believe that state would act according to their own ideas and needs when liberals believe that state would act according to their populations needs and ideas. But both theories share the idea that without military power state can be destroyed or insulted by another country. I consider myself as a liberal and mostly liberalism is theory which makes me thinking about things that can be changed in aggressive world by liberalism such as equal rights regardless of sexual orientation or to have every woman the same rights as men, through liberalism I also believe in freedom and equal living wage. I have sympathies to liberalism because believe in government actions to achieve equal opportunity and

Show More
Related
920 Words | 4 Pages

liberalism is the pursuit of change and progress for the better good, socially and politically. Liberals of the late nineteenth century, often believed in “new” ideals like liberty and equality, as well as the overthrow of the monarchy in place of a more equal government that gave more power to the people. One key principle of liberalism that evolved from the French revolution is the idea that the will of the people should be represented in the government’s actions. Toussaint talks about this general will in the Haitian constitution, “the terms of this constitution are the free, voluntary, and unchanging expression of our hearts and of our constituents’ general will” (The Haitian Constitution) He believed that his people should have a say in what the government did.

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

Context plays an important role in understanding the difference between modern liberalism and classical liberalism. Classical liberalism main priority was to downsize government control and interference with social issues, trade, and market (Roskin, 2013). The biggest problem with classical liberalism is that it frees up the market to become vulnerable to a monopoly. Modern liberalism was created to combat classical liberalism. Modern liberalism is a belief that requires the government to be proactive when solving social issues, as well more government regulation in trade or the market (Roskin, 2013).

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

When trying to define a word such as Liberalism it seems difficult to find a solid definition. There are different forms of liberalism and different meanings depending on the time period it is being applied to (idea taken from Phil Badger author from philosophynow). To solve this ambiguity, I’ve decided to define liberalism based on the time period in which I will be conducting my research. Liberalism in the 1700s was the belief of freedom and equals rights generally associated with the enlightenment thinkers, John Locke and Montesquieu (as defined by wikipedia.org). Liberalism didn’t start in the 1700s.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The Pitfalls of Liberalism was a document by Stokely Carmichael who is known as one of the most recognized exponents of the “Black Power.” Movement. Stokely Carmichaels main argument in this document is that the efforts of Dr. Martin Luther King along with other civil rights activists had reached an endpoint since the use of “Widespread resistance within America” (238) was in effect. Throughout the semester, we have never seen a document where a leaders only solution to advance is by “calling for the mobilization of organized violence by African-Americans in order to seize political power” (238). The concept of calling upon one single race to take action is new.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Whereas from a liberal perspective states and people can cooperate for mutual benefit (positive sum game), from a realist/economic nationalist perspective the state must look after its own interests. Realist governments play the zero-sum game, where one states gain is another ones loss. This is done because of the potential threat of the sum of free trade being negative for their own nation. By engaging in this form of protectionism governments are seeking an outcome of hegemony from free trade. From a realist perspective the economic policy of a government must at all times be aimed at increasing the state's power.

Read More
406 Words | 2 Pages

Is liberal nationalism an oxymoron? Liberal nationalism is a hybrid doctrine proposing and supporting the idea of the mutual interests between a non-xenophobic type of nationalism affably compatible with the values of freedom, tolerance, equality and individual rights of liberalism. It is an international system based on nation states that are not only free because they have achieved statehood from a nationalist viewpoint, but also because they represent their citizens and guarantee their rights from a liberal perspective. Being representative of their people, these states are thought to be more prone to have nonviolent cordial relations with each other and collaborate for shared goals. Consequently, a liberal nationalist order safeguards

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

This essay will focus on one of the key theory of international relations; Neorealism or structural realism. By examining this theory and the principles that notable theorist Kenneth Waltz in his 1979 book “Theory of International Politics” has outlined. The three main perspectives that will be discussed include the notion of an anarchic system, the international security dilemma and the struggle for international state power and hegemony.

Read More
131 Words | 1 Pages

There are various different ways people get information about government and politics. However, the three main ways are from social media, the news media, and from the way people talk about politics with family and friends. But when it comes to receiving news for the Liberals and Conservatives, they have different point of views and trust only few. Three of the Newscasts that have Conservative and Liberal Values are CNN, FOX, and MSNBC. It is believed that CNN is fifteen percent Liberal and that MSNBC is twelve percent Liberal, however FOX is forty-seven percent Conservative.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

Romanticism differs from all the other isms because unlike the others, it is less a political view and more of a standard of living view. Romanticism doesn't focus on the political or economic world, instead it just urges people to use emotion rather than reason or logic. Liberalism sort of goes hand in hand with nationalism although both conservatives and liberals can be nationalists. Liberals are people who want everyone to be equal and they want less of a gap between the classes as well as equal rights. The are the opposite of conservatives who believe that those in power should stay in power and it should remain the same as the old days.

Read More
1387 Words | 6 Pages

Introduction Liberalism is a governmental doctrine that seizes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central setback of politics. Liberals normally trust that power is vital to protect people from being damaged by others; but they additionally understand that power itself can pose a menace to liberty. An ideology is a set of thoughts that a commercial or governmental arrangement is established on. A theory is a proper set of thoughts that is aimed to clarify why something happens or exists. Discussion Ideology Ideology is an extra or less consistent set of thoughts that provides a basis for coordinated governmental deed, whether this is aimed to uphold, adjust or topple the continuing arrangement of manipulation relationships.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

The theory unleashes such dynamic forces that from the time of its inception up till now it has governed the international system of the world however things one day itself fall apart. The Realists mark the State as the locus of different international circles and these sovereign states have vested interests which are always selfish. Realism is a heartless theory, man is not supposed to be selfish in the way exaggerated by the Realist thinker however [he] is a seeker of knowledge and what so ever he stumbles upon, he keeps

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

They say that opposites attract and although it might be true for some things, when it comes to politics, that theory does not exist. Just like there is always going to be two sides to a story, there are two sides on the political spectrum. The American political arena has for decades been divided into two ideas: the liberals and the conservatives. The word liberal is derived from the Latin word "liber" meaning free. Liberals are described as the “left-wing federalists” known as democrats that believe in free and fair elections, human rights, capitalism, free trade among nations, separation of church and state, and spread of civil rights and civil to name a few.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

Idealism and Realism are two strongly opposed views of foreign policy. At the core of this opposition is the issue of power and security in politics. Realism establishes a separation between politics and ethics in order to understand and comprehend international events. Realists don’t oppose morality to politics, nor power to law, but rather oppose the utopian peaceful society to the nature of society.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

Classical realism and structural realism are both theories of International Relations, therefore huge differences are noticed in between those two. The main difference lies in the motivation to power, which is seen differently by both theories. Classical realism is concentrated in the desire of power- influence, control and dominance as basic to human nature. Whereas, structural realism is focused on the international system anarchic structure and how the great powers behave. Classical realists believe that power is related to human nature, thus their analysis of individuals and states is similar.

Read More
1381 Words | 6 Pages

The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous with the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists, however, expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact, both they must be viewed as actors.

Read More

More about Similarities Between Realism And Liberalism

Related Topics

Open Document