Examples Of Lincoln's Reasoning Behind The Emancipation Proclamation

In the history textbooks of today’s educational institution, within the pages somewhere you can locate it stating either directly or indirectly that Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Although that point is arguably true, you have to analyze his true motives and reasoning behind the emancipation proclamation. It’s understood that the primary object of the civil war was to preserve and restore the union over all states. Although, this was arguably the original reason, a disclosure made by Colonel Baldwin of the aims of the head of that party, are sufficient to prove that the real purpose was for other than the fabrication - to enlarge and perpetuate the power of his faction. Before the Civil war began Abraham Lincoln was clear about his focal

Georgia secedes on January 19, 1861. Six days following Georgia, Louisiana secedes as well. Kansas admits to the union on January 29, 1861. On the other hand, on February 1, 1861 Texas secedes from the union. February 8, 1861 the confederate sates of America was formed. Arkansas, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia shadowed the confederate states of America and seceded later after the battle of fort Sumter. The seceding start on December 20, 1860 was a result of the southern population being Convinced that their way of life, based on slavery, was irretrievably threatened by the election of President Abraham Lincoln (November 1860), the seven states of the Deep South (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas) seceded from the Union. April 12, 1861 The Civil war officially begins with the battle of Fort Sumter. This shows the accurate motives of Abraham Lincoln and The Civil war because it verifies that he initiated the war after the states seceded from the union and attempted to form their own country (the confederate states of

Abraham Lincoln wrote to Greeley “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it,” Now does this mean he was pro-slavery? No. Although it doesn’t mean that he was pro-slavery, you must concede that this shows that he wasn’t actively against slavery either. I admitted the word “actively” in my last statement because he has spoken out about how he disagrees with slavery. Later on in the same letter he does write “and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;” This clarify his stand-point about the union and slavery. At this particular point in time he doesn’t necessarily care too much about slavery but more about anything that could benefit the union−and if that is freeing slaves then he is an active advocate for that. Abraham Lincoln is a man of many faces because he tells Joshua Speed that he total disagree with some of the practices of slavery in 1855 which was years before the seceding of states and the civil war. He writes “I leave that matter entirely to yourself. I also acknowledge