ipl-logo

Examples Of Moral Ambiguity In Frankenstein

1164 Words5 Pages

Moral ambiguity is lack of clarity in ethical decision-making. That is, when an issue, situation, or question has moral dimensions or implications, but the decidedly “moral” action to take are unclear, either due to conflicting principles, ethical systems, or situational perspectives. The desire for companionship is the main theme surrounding Frankenstein. The creature‘s loneliness is led by the abandonment of his creator Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein was horrified upon the realization of the creature he has brought to life. He quickly retreats into despair and isolation. This causes only violence and ruins of the city as the result of the monsters abandonment. In the novel, Frankenstein by Mary Shelly explores the idea of science and …show more content…

Frankenstein; the creature lashes out on the human species. The creature believes that his creator is at the one to blame for the injustice that he faces because he brought him to life. He says “cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live, did I not extinguish the spark of existence….. My feelings were of rage and revenge” (Shelly, 121) As a result of the way his creator treated him, the monster planned vengeance. Vengeance against a parent is morally wrong. Revenge is caused by hatred. This means that the monster had a great deal of hate toward his creator. The little humanity that the monster had was gone now that he no longer feels guilt or the need to control his anger. He declares “For the first time the feelings of revenge and hatred filled my bosom and I did not strive to control them, but allowing myself to be borne away by the stream, I bent my mind towards injury and death” (shelly, 121) it is ethically wrong to wish death and injury upon once mother or father. Dr. Frankenstein stood as a father figure for the monster. The hate that comes from the monster is due to the fact that he was rejected by his creator and left in isolation. Upon the realization that he was truly a monster and that the people would not accept him the monster professed “There were none among the myriad of man that existed who would pity or assist me: and should I feel kindness toward my …show more content…

Was justice served in Frankenstein? There are two sides to this answer. At the beginning of the novel we only hear Frankenstein’s side until the creature demands to be heard. He states “I entreat you to hear me, before you give vent to your hatred on my devoted head” (Shelly 72). Between pages 78-108 the monster is given a voice and justifies his actions. Even though most of its justifications are morally wrong. The monster blamed Justine for her beauty and before she had the chance to reject him he made a decision for her. He left the locket that belonged to William after killing him in her position, leaving her to take the blame displaying unfair. After the locket was discovered on Justine she was pushed by the court to confess. Justine confessed “I did confess: but I confessed a lie. I confessed that I might obtain absolution” (77). The courts forced her in to faulty confession. The moral thing to do is” innocent till proven guilty” but they had an assumption that she was in fact guilty without a fair investigation, which is ethically a wrong thing to do. Knowing that Justine was innocent and was exsiccated troubled Frankenstein because he knew the truth. He said “From the tortures of my own heart…This also was my doing” (78) Through Frankenstein’s cowardliness he was unable to free Justin when he knew the truth. She died because of his fear. Frankenstein went against all moral

Show More
Related
1348 Words | 6 Pages

One after another victim-to-victim fell to the unjust and unlawful acts of the justice system of the time without any help from the surrounding society. Justine was the first to fall because of how no one stood up for her in the society that lived all around her therefore she took the fall for everything. Second to feel the heat was Mr. De Lacy who consequently dragged the whole family down the government did not want Mr. De Lacy poking around anymore so they framed him. No one tried to appeal the trial or even tried to find evidence to help his case. Finally Victor, the one who sat there and did not speak up for Justine, felt the cold shoulder from society too when he was accused of murder.

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Frankenstein let this situation slip through his fingers, and because of it many people he loved died. Even the act of creating the monster is questionable as whether it’s good or bad. But that’s a different discussion. Frankenstein’s drive to kill the monster and enact his revenge caused the monster to kill more and more. In a way, the monster was Frankenstein’s medium for murder, considering that Frankenstein’s actions result in death.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

I wouldn't fully trust Frankenstein's word after this part of the book. Being able watch an innocent woman die know it's your own fault shows that you have no moral conscience and cannot be

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

The implication that most of the infantry soldiers are working class men is presented through the use of language in the speaker’s speech. On the other hand, it also shows that the upper class people are not interested in joining the military. To explain, the way in which the speaker uses simple language throughout his speech shows that he, who sign up to become a soldier, is not high class people. This is because the upper class people tend to use more grand style of speech to show their power and authority, while most of working class men use less grand style of speech or complicated sentences. For example,.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

In the protection of his image of self, which is a direct result of a god complex, Victor Frankenstein rationalizes his arguably terrible choices to combat the guilt that stems from his involvement with William and Justine’s

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

In the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the creature is an outcast in society, without a friend in the who world is thrust away by humanity due to his appearance. The creature devolves due to a series of events feeling different emotions for the first time in his life. These experiences due to the fact his creator, Victor Frankenstein turns his back on the creature leaving him to his own instincts on learning how to survive and integrate into society. devices to learn how to survive. becoming helpless, discouraged leading into leading into retaliation of anger and violence.

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

Frankenstein didn 't ever physically murder anyone, however, he knew his creation would and never spoke up. Therefore, he is just as guilty as his creation. In summary, Dr. Frankenstein’s narcissistic personality persists throughout the entire novel until the very end, when he dies trying to kill his creation. Many people believe in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley that the creature that Dr. Frankenstein creates is the monster of the story, however, people who actually read the novel will know that Victor Frankenstein is the real monster of the story because of the way he was selfish, abandoned his creation, and let other people die as a result of his

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the plot of the book, the topic of isolation occurs frequently. Mary Shelley conveys the message that isolation causes dangerous behavior through the characters in the piece. Victor Frankenstein’s thoughts and actions towards the monster and the monster’s destructive habits following its isolation portray this

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

The murders and immoral actions of Frankenstein’s monster are justified because he did not have a parental figure, was neglected by the general public,

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the tale of a mad scientist is told who surpasses the limits of science and what is typically considered to be possible for man to achieve. One of the many underlying stories, though, can be seen in the monster who is created and then brought to life at the beginning of the novel. The monster’s development throughout the novel begins with initially being rejected and neglected by his creator Victor Frankenstein. The monster turns aggressive soon after and seeks revenge on Frankenstein’s family, killing off each one, one at a time. These actions are obviously very unlike that of an average human child, but when you look at his horrendous acts as being in response to negligence by a parental figure,

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Over the past century, Frankenstein has been analyzed and interpreted in seemingly infinite different forms of literature, film, and television shows. Once solely recognized as the story about a brilliant scientist who creates a creature in whom he regrets making after the creature turns out ugly, Frankenstein now represents an internationally recognized and commercialized pop culture symbol for Halloween decorations and costumes. When analyzing and appreciating the true literary essence behind Mary Shelley’s original Frankenstein, one of the most important comparisons to consider remains the underlying influences behind the Creature’s immoral actions and whether or not the blame for these actions belong to Victor or the Creature. When exploring the dichotomy of the Creature versus Victor Frankenstein, one of the biggest and most widely debated questions remains whether Victor should be blamed for the Creature’s destructive actions or if the Creature should be considered guilty for his actions based off of his own free will. Many consider Victor Frankenstein the villain of the story due to his repetitive decisions to abandon and avoid his own “mistake,” the irresponsible choice of creating the monster in the first place, and his obvious negligence of the Creature’s feelings.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

An individuals' desire to seek vengeance can only be accomplished through the corruption of one's soul. Whether one seeks revenge through violence, or emotional torture, the individual seeking retribution discovers that they will pay a high price on their own innocence and emotional well being. In the novel Frankenstein the main protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, creates a creature who seeks vengeance on his creator as a result of his abandonment. Victor, in an act of protest also seeks his own revenge by not giving into the creatures demands. In the end both ultimately pay the price of revenge with their own lives.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Mary Shelley shows the endless amount of revenge and that it is driven by pure hatred and rage. The monster was not created to be vengeful, he was kind hearted but when he was poorly treated by Victor and then by the Delacey family, he turned cold. In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley displays the immorality and destructive effects that revenge can have through Frankenstein and his pursuit of the creature. Immediately after the monster had awoken, hatred thickened and would drive the plot to be all about revenge. The creature illustrates this hatred as he says to Victor, “Everything is related in them which bears reference to my accursed origin; the whole detail of that series of disgusting circumstances which produced it is set in view;

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the two main characters, Victor Frankenstein and his creature, both display a sense of moral ambiguity. Each character has committed both good and evil alike, and neither knew the consequences of what they had done. However, Victor Frankenstein is generally the morally ambiguous character by his treatment of his creation and his own imperious personality. He wanted to be able to help science by recreating life or bringing it back, but at the same time, he did not want to consider the consequences of doing so. Victor tries to prove himself as a good moral character in the relationship between his creation and himself.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the novel, the main character Frankenstein, made many poor decisions that I would consider to be morally wrong and unethical. Frankenstein’s research and discoveries are ethically wrong because he was taking dead bodies from cemeteries, cutting off their limbs, and body parts to create a human like creature. He did not have anyone's consent to do this study causing it to be unethical, and he also should not be able to do this because he is playing the role of god. In the beginning of the book, Victor Frankenstein described to Walton that he had created a monster using body parts from a graveyard.

Read More

More about Examples Of Moral Ambiguity In Frankenstein

Related Topics

Open Document