ipl-logo

Examples Of Prince Hal's Behavior In Henry Iv Part 1

1765 Words8 Pages

The Heavy Crown Strategizing to achieve a major goal is a curious human endeavor. If done successfully, it can elevate a common man to extraordinary heights by structuring haphazard - albeit measured risks. Or if you are the son of the King of England and have nefarious enemies, an unstable ascension to the throne and civil war in your country; it is a valuable trait to possess. Shakespeare’s Henry IV Part 1 and Henry V examine the intricacies of politics and what it means to be king. Prince Hal is intentionally childish and irresponsible much to the chagrin of his father, King Henry IV. The King is greatly distressed over his son's keeping company with thieves and highwaymen and engaging in plebeian life. Prince Hal, however, reasons …show more content…

He engages in unruly behavior as a break or holiday from his princely duties before he becomes King. His father, greatly grieved over his son’s demeanor, wishes Hal would act more like a prince who will inherit the throne. Hotspur, his enemy, has more claim and support to be the heir of the throne than Hal. After being reprimanded by his father for another offense, Hal states “I shall hereafter, my thrice-gracious lord, be more myself” (3.2.92-93). After neglecting his duty to the king and the country, it is the first time Hal embraces responsibility that is his birthright. As he is the successor to a usurper, he must be strong in his convictions if he does not want the throne stolen by another; i.e. Hotspur. However, Hal has already shown he has been planning ahead for his role as a king for some time. He formulates his plan to act idle in his youth and astound everyone when he becomes a great king which reveals his strategic and pragmatic nature. More analysis. At this line, Hal chooses to shed his mask of indifference and end his vacation; thus startling the King who gives him command of some armies. Hal is now in charge of multiple lives other than his own which both frightens him and exhilarates him as his plan is finally coming to realization. He is determined to be the princeliest of princes, a paragon of chivalry and competency. Hal is …show more content…

He has not only managed to win the war, but he remains relatively guilt-free as only twenty five men died in his armies. He welcomes his full duties as king. Although, he still bears the heavy weight of the crown, Henry chooses to embrace it rather than run from it. Thus, Henry V proves that he is one of the most compelling and competent kings England has ever seen. He seems contemplative of his role as prince and king throughout the plays and despairs over the responsibility he has over his subject’s lives and ultimately emerges to serve the common

Show More
Related
676 Words | 3 Pages

In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

Initially a pure of heart child is chose in Ralph but this eventually changes when Jack decides to start his own tribe. This leads to the boys leaving Ralph for the preferable leader: Jack, who’s violence and intimidation entices the boys to join him. The boys live in constant fear of a beast that Jack also uses as a tool to garner support. William Golding shows that humans follow corrupt leaders because they provide protection, exude confidence and manipulate effectively.

Read More
1583 Words | 7 Pages

Hamlet was a prince but he never acted like one. He could take revenge by being the king and punish his uncle, Claudius. His procrastination never gave any solution to him rather it brought

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

King Henry is portrayed to us as the main leader within the English ranks and an important component of their strategy. One characteristic of Henry’s leadership is that he is able to forge close connections with his men. During the Battle of Harfleur, we see him describe his men as “dear

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

The Prince, written by Machiavelli, is a candid outline of how he believes leaders gain and keep power. Machiavelli uses examples of past leaders to determine traits that are necessary to rule successfully. Leaders such as the King of Naples and the Duke of Milan lacked military power, made their subjects hate them, or did not know how to protect themselves from the elite, causing them to lose power. He says that these rulers should blame laziness, not luck, for their failures. By looking at these historical successes and failures, Machiavelli is able to develop his own thoughts on how politics and leaders should be in the future.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout William Shakespeare’s 1597 History “The First Part of King Henry the Fourth”, the importance of individual reputation proves to be a catalyst for character advancement and plot development alike. King Henry’s repeated emphasis on the superior characteristics of himself and Hotspur earlier in the scene establish a dichotomy between the ideal leader and Prince Henry. In a rebuttal to his father 's disapproving tone, Hal vows to reclaim both his honor as a prince and his honor as a son. Shakespeare’s use of language through lines 129-159 in act III.2 foreshadows events to come while reinforcing Prince Henry’s earlier assertion that he will be the victor when battling Hotspur.

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

The perfect king must be just that-perfect. As Plato puts together a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon in The Republic, their ideas as well as his own thoughts on the perfect ruler for a perfect society form a tightly knit description of a philosopher-king. Because we, as humans, live in “a cave” (Plato, sect. 514a) of our own understanding, there is a great need for a leader who is escaped from the confinement of that limited understanding. There is an element of perfection in the qualities of “ruling men who are wholly fair” (Plato, sect.

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

Once he sets a goal, he uses every resource and focuses all his energy on accomplishing that goal; clearly, he takes his position as a king very seriously. He claims that he does not have the privilege of the ‘untroubled’ sleep of a common man indicating that he is dedicated to fulfilling his obligations as a leader. Furthermore, Shakespeare intends for us to view Henry as a hero by making him seem so committed to his responsibilities above his own personal feelings. (Source B)

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Patrick Henry, former governor of Virginia, bravely spoke on the 23rd of March, 1775, at St. John’s Church, introducing his strategies to end the American Revolution in victory. The speech was so inspiring that it ignited a massive flame of patriotism. Americans began to greatly support his political ideology. Due to his stirring choice of words, the phrase “Give me liberty, or give me death!” impacted the listeners, making his remarkable words yet known to this date.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

A Soldier’s Dilemma Like many others in his regiment, Henry Fleming, protagonist in The Red Badge of Courage, expects the Battle of Chancellorsville to be filled with heroism and legendary acts of dauntless heroism. Heroism, however, seems nowhere to be found, and Henry is left questioning his own valor. In The Red Badge of Courage, Crane writes Henry Fleming as a flawed yet good-hearted character by revealing his inner thoughts as he runs from the battle, his actions directed toward comrades, and by displaying Henry’s differences at the end of the story to emphasize the inner struggle between courage and cowardice.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Michael Olufunsho Fafemi Alan Rosiene HUM 2052 February 6 2018 Hamlet, The Claudius similarity and Machiavellism Shakespeare through the play Hamlet portrays many complex themes through the various characters in the play. Hamlet, the protagonist is in particular a mesh of various complexities and ideas. He is often caught in between his own opposing characteristics and these ultimately affect the course of his actions.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

Significantly he tells inconvenient truths to the King with the unbridled insolence of a conscience. The King’s descent into madness comes when, importantly, he banishes his Fool ' '.(2016:278).In fact, King Lear is a masterpiece of psychological insight into human nature. In this tragedy scene, the picture which Shakespeare has painted of King Lear becomes completely reversed here. Indeed, Many characters have flaws affecting their decisions in English literature, they made mistakes only to realize them later.

Read More
1955 Words | 8 Pages

Preema Hamid ENG 338 Professor Prescott March 29, 2018 King Lear’s Character Growth Shakespeare’s King Lear is a complex play that complicates morality with foolishness, as well as associates madness with wisdom. It is about political authority as much as it is about family dynamics. William Shakespeare, known for his clever wordplay, wrote this play so that King Lear 's wisest characters are depicted as making foolish decisions. Lear, the King of Britain, is an authoritative and important man.

Read More
1124 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare really wrote tragedies of great heights and earned standard category. His one of the best creation Richard II is a historical play rather being a tragedy. The history play is usually distinguished especially by its political purposes from other kinds of plays. Shakespeare 's use of his sources shows that he wanted to emphasize the political issues involved in the conflict between Richard and Bolingbroke, mainly the privileges of kingship and the right of rebellion. The play is consequently written not about the down fall of its hero but around the chronological stages by which Bolingbroke threatens, captures, and retains the crown.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Due to himself being too idealistic and restrained, he does not take decisive actions even after using the planned play to test the Claudius's conscience that could possibly expose himself and left himself in unfavorable circumstances. Hamlet’s inability to act is caused by his overanalysis of the situations that further render him from not carrying out actions in response. If Hamlet is not indecisive, he would not be uncertain about the evidence regarding to his uncle’s crime, he would not be delaying his revenge, he would not be having emotional breakdowns and become a tragic figure. Hamlet’s personality ‘borns’ and develops under his royal position and the growing

Read More

More about Examples Of Prince Hal's Behavior In Henry Iv Part 1

Related Topics

Open Document