ipl-logo

Examples Of Proof Why Canada Should Use More Nuclear Energy

695 Words3 Pages

Opening/Attention:
Good afternoon everyone! My name is William. Today, I am going to talk about Canada should use more nuclear energy. Before I start to talk about it, I want to ask few questions. What do you think about nuclear energy is safe or not? Do you know why nuclear energy is important to us? And do you really know why we need to have this kind of energy? After my speech, it will make you to understand why we need to rely on this kind of energy. I will provide some information, examples or stories, facts, few rebuttal reasons and conclusions to proof why Canada should use more nuclear energy.

Spoken Link/Transition: First of all, I am going to tell you how scientists discover nuclear energy. (History)

Emotion/Story:
After World …show more content…

Facts, data, expert opinion:
a) Low Pollution such as air pollution, water pollution
- Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide
b) Low Operating Costs
- The cost of the uranium, which is utilized as a fuel in this process, is low. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. The normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being …show more content…

However, there are few opposition opinions.

“Rebuttal”:
a) Environmental Impact
- The process of mining and refining uranium hasn’t been a clean process.
b) Nuclear Accidents - The Chernobyl accident that occurred on 26 April 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine was the worst nuclear accident in the history.
c) High Cost - At present, the nuclear business let waste cool for a considerable length of time before blending it with glass and putting away it in enormous cooled, solid structures. This waste must be kept up, observed and watched to keep the materials from falling into the wrong hands and causing problems. These administrations and included materials cost cash – on top of the high expenses needed to put together a plant, which may make it less desirable to invest in.
d) Uranium is Finite
- Uranium is finite and exists in few of the countries. It is pretty expensive to mine, refine and transport uranium. It produces considerable amount of waste during all these activities and can result in environmental contamination and serous health effects, if not handled properly.

Spoken Link/Transition:

Closing/Call to

Show More
Related
354 Words | 2 Pages

When the nuclei of Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239 undergo nuclear fission, they produce waste as a by-product, which is known as nuclear waste or “fission fragments”. (Leslie Corrice, 2015) This waste contains radioisotopes, which are radioactive isotopes that have long half-lives. This means that the radioisotopes are able to stay in the atmosphere for hundreds of thousands of years, which is extremely hazardous to the earth’s environment. Very commonly this waste contaminates water and ruins the quality of both air and soil, which in turn devastates the planet.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear waste should be stored at Yucca Mountain. There are many positive reasons of why the waste should be stored on Yucca Mountain, such as the fact that no one lives on Yucca Mountain. There has not been an recent earthquake on the mountain. There is also the fact that it does not rain a lot on the mountain. So this is why nuclear waste should be stored on Yucca Mountain.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Power plants burn fuel to produce heat to generate energy; however, nuclear power plants use the heat given off fission to turn water into steam. Nuclear energy is without a doubt a great way to power our homes because, Nuclear power plants are safer than other energy alternatives. Nuclear plants are safer than other energy alternatives. Coal is responsible for five times more deaths than nuclear power plants, coal also causes over one thousands more serious causes of illness than nuclear. Nuclear plants produce steam while coal plants, heat water by burning coal that produces greenhouse emissions.

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

In “Nuclear Waste” by Richard A. Muller, he expresses his concerns about radioactive material in Yucca Mountain that will be left behind for thousands of years and the unfamiliar dangers that we face. He starts by stating that nuclear waste is one of the biggest issues that our government faces even though they highly follow their “safe” nuclear waste disposal. He stresses how the government prototype nuclear waste facility at Yucca Mountain is supposed to be so safe, but they built it on a site that was created by volcanic activity. Scientist have contemplated many different ways to dispose of nuclear waste, but they all seem like the worse than their previous ideas and some still are considering more nuclear power. After his intense evaluation

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Over 20 percent of the energy in the United States comes from nuclear energy power plants. (Rinkesh, 2018) They so their best to get as much energy to the country as possible, but there are those out there who don’t agree with them. While there are downsides to nuclear energy, the pros vastly outweigh the cons. Nuclear power plants are a great way to get energy because they don’t let out much pollution, are very efficient, and are very safe.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Richard A. Muller a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, expresses his concerns on the subject of nuclear waste. In his essay, Nuclear Waste, he writes about where the United States stores its nuclear waste, alternative ways to dispose of the waste and whether it would be effective. He also talks about how dangerous the nuclear by-product is, and other dangers regarding civilian’s safety. He effectively explains his concerns through pathos, logos, ethos, and other uses of examples to help readers understand his concerns. He attracts readers by talking about the future generation and their safety against potential nuclear waste contamination.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Storage: Many different storage methods have been discussed throughout history, with very few being implemented because of the problematic nature of storing such hazardous material that will remain radioactive for thousands of years. Only one was implemented – ocean disposal was actually used by thirteen different countries and was the method of dumping radioactive waste into the oceans in order to get rid of it. 3. Effects on Nature: One of the biggest concerns that the world has with the disposal of nuclear waste is the affect the hazardous materials could have on animals and plant life.

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

Nuclear power plants can be dangerous, extremely dangerous, every thirty years something bad has happened at a nuclear power plant, and if we keep having them every thirty years there will be another accident if we continue to let them be built around the country, I am highly against them because of all the meltdowns that have happened. Nuclear power plants are known to have meltdowns and accidents, but when they take lives or harm people is when they need to shut down until everything can be cleaned up, but sometimes that doesn’t happen, sometimes they take care of the injured person or persons and then start working again which could only result in more accidents and meltdowns in the future which could be more harmful. Now, melt downs aren't

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

Second, handling nuclear wastes creates concern of capability. It deteriorates the capability of coming generations to present current levels of managerial and technological potential which can be lost due to armed or social conflicts over waste sites. Lastly, it creates concerns of potential mistakes which are a problem whereby generations to come encounter the dangers of natural disaster, earthquake or accidents that may cause production of radiation. It is through the laws and regulations of the government that aim to manage the rate of nuclear power production that the nuclear waste management jurisdiction can be

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

According to the World Nuclear Association, 11 percent of the world’s electricity is currently powered by nuclear energy since the inception of the first nuclear plant in 1950, with 65 more plants under construction. The figures might not mean much but I feel that with its steady increase in the statistics, it will bring a steady increase in the dangers and damages to humanity and environment. Many people say that nuclear energy is the future because of the long list of advantages, but I think otherwise.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

One cannot deny that some nuclear waste is produced and that it is radioactive. However, according to the World Nuclear Association in many countries, nuclear waste accounts for just 1% of all toxic wastes. This means that only a small amount of waste is produced and it would be easy to contain. Furthermore, the BBC states that you are able to reprocess nuclear waste and reuse up to 97% of it. This means that waste can be reduced even further and that that supplies of Uranium can be sustained for longer.

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

How Technology has changed the World I. Intro a. Over time humans have destroyed the environment with pollution and now we are creating new technologies to spot polluting our planet. b. Technology is rapidly evolving and it has changed the way people live out their lives. People have become attached to technology and it is affecting the way we live both physically and mentally.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization. Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats.

Read More

More about Examples Of Proof Why Canada Should Use More Nuclear Energy

Related Topics

Open Document