ipl-logo

Examples Of Restricted Utilitarianism

1516 Words7 Pages

Because of their desire to know truth, philosophers rightly scrutinize the ideas they come across. However, the conclusions that philosophers arrive upon after dissecting a theory tends to be a bit extreme. They tend to discount entire theories if it has poor support of if it cannot hold its ground during edge cases. If a theory isn’t 100% sound, the atmosphere around the conversation makes the theory seem 100% wrong. Although Dworkin is correct that unrestricted utilitarianism cannot account for equality, his argument that neutral utilitarianism on its own is self-contradictory is wrong due to his misunderstanding of his own definition of utilitarianism. Once we address this major shortcoming and make sure that the project itself is valid, …show more content…

A thought experiment creates a world centered around Sarah. An example of a world with corrupted utilitarianism is if Sarah’s preferences are twice as important as anyone else’s. Now let’s imagine a world where preferences are satisfied in accordance with neutral utilitarianism, and this world is also filled with Sarah-lovers. The main preference of Sarah-lovers is that Sarah’s preferences count for double in the overall utility equation, and if Sarah’s preferences aren’t fulfilled, these people will be unsatisfied because their Sarah-loving preferences are unsatisfied. Dworkin says that this case is the same as the corrupted utilitarianism case. Without check, neutral utilitarianism shifted into corrupt utilitarianism because Sarah will receive a disproportionate amount of goods and services which in itself disregards the egalitarian project of neutral …show more content…

He asserts that no one will be favored during preference fulfillment under neutral utilitarianism. He also states that “utilitarianism must claim truth for itself” and be against any theory that logically opposes it (Dworkin 155). Dworkin thinks unrestricted neutral utilitarianism is self-contradictory because impartial preference fulfillment leads to an unequal distribution of resources which is inherently partial – in Dworkin’s words: “neutral provision is then self-undermining (Dworkin 155).” This is where I disagree with Dworkin’s

Show More
Related
1311 Words | 6 Pages

In other words, the only effect of an action that is relevant is the bad and good outcomes it produces (Henry, 2011). It is notable that people who uphold utilitarianism believe that morality has the purpose of making life better by way of increasing

Read More
623 Words | 3 Pages

In this case utilitarian ethics was never considered by the government employee. Utilitarian ethics involves the moral value of an action which is entirely a function of its consequences; thus utilitarian believers believe that the right action is the action that has the best overall consequences, or does the most overall good (Johnson and Reath p. 208). Although Hardy-Everette did not act alone, her actions affected her husband as

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

I feel like Mrs. Bergmeier definitely took a utilitarian approach to her problem, as she pushed aside the moral thing to do, in order to generate the

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

William's believes in Utilitarianism, and defines it as “ the doctrine that actions are right if they are useful of for the benefit of a majority”. This applies to the example he used when talking about the indians and Jim. He used this situation which stated that Jim had to kill one indian, and get to mark the occasion, and the other indians will be let off; Or he refuses, and there will be no special occasion, and Pedro will kill them all. (Williams, p. ) Williams also argues against the utilitarianism theory, by saying that it conflicts with human nature.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

This is portrayed by a political philosopher, Michael J. Sandel in his writing titled: Justice: What’s the Right Thing to do. In this writing, Sandel states that utilitarianism only considers individual rights when “... Each person’s preference [is] counted along with everyone else’s.” This is a contradiction in itself as individualism is a concept that stands on its own and considers each human as a separate entity from the masses.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

Utilitarian hypotheses bolster the thought

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

In healthcare, Utilitarian’s believe in everyone having equal healthcare, or moral proper care regardless of their issues. A few examples of this are smokers who have bad lungs because they smoke receive the same care as non-smokers with bad lungs, or who also receive the same care as a person with a genetic heart disease, or a killer receiving the same care as a non-killer. Consequentialism and non-consequentialism involve making judgements about a person’s moral actions and the reasons behind

Read More
366 Words | 2 Pages

The problem with Utilitarianism is that it very easily justifies the oppression and abuse of minorities as long as the majority of people is better off because of it. Why would it be wrong to keep 10% of the population as slaves if 90% of the population never have to do hard or unpleasant work as a result? Why would it be wrong to simply kill people who aren't well liked by the majority if they all feel better as a result? The issue with a philosophy that bases whether something is good or evil purely on whether the majority or the minority are benefiting is simply a nightmare scenario for anyone who's part of a minority that is said to cause unhappiness for the majority. Like, the Empire in Star Wars is Utilitarian.

Read More
1792 Words | 8 Pages

Utilitarianism was established around the 18th and mid-19th century and is a legacy from both philosophy and classic economic theory (_____). There are three assumptions under utilitarianism. The first is that people are purposive and driven to capitalize on maternal benefits from interactions among others in a free and competitive marketplace. Next, representatives have access to the necessary info to evaluate options and analyze expenses of every possibility in a free market. Lastly, people can judiciously select which activities will increase their profits based on calculations (McEwen & Wills, 2014; Turner, 2013).

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

I personally appreciate utilitarianism because it makes sense to do what is best for the group or that which produces the most happiness. In my opinion, it is considered so radical because of its collectivistic approach in a more individualistic culture. Furthermore, it goes against religious doctrine since it does not follow a defined doctrine that dictates whether something is right or wrong. While I appreciate its logic, I do not agree with the utilitarian stance on all issues.

Read More
224 Words | 1 Pages

Utilitarianism isn’t a structure of moral theory in that it doesn’t compel someone to commit their own happiness. Moreover, it informs a range of right

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

simply because we are all rational individuals capable of reasoning? Morality should not therefore be something we can calculate by merely weighing costs and benefits. An objection towards utilitarianism is therefore the failure to consider the separateness of persons thus individual rights. To utilitarians, the only importance of a person is the way that he can contribute towards achieving utility in a community. This means that utilitarianism fails to

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction In this essay, I will be comparing Deontology to Utilitarianism. I will attempt to substantiate why I am justified in arguing that Deontology is a superior moral theory than Utilitarianism. A Discussion of the Main Elements of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory developed by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1947 – 1832) and refined by fellow countryman John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873).

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism is a very controversial theory. Many people disagree with this idea because it disrupts our personal relationships, it is too demanding, it promotes that the consequences are the only thing that matters, and shows that pleasures are the only things that are important. Classical Utilitarianism is based on three points; that morality of actions are only bases on consequences, the consequences only matter if it creates more or less happiness, and everyone gets equal considerations when it comes to happiness. The classical Utilitarianism was made and defended by three philosophers from 19th century England; John Mill, Jeremy Bentham, and Henry Sidgwick. These people help this theory to be highly influential in the modern era.

Read More

More about Examples Of Restricted Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document