The Great Gatsby is arguably Scott Fitzgerald’s most excellent portrayal of the American society in the 1920s when the country was undergoing an unprecedented economic boom. Through its theme of a romantic and prosperous love, the novel offers a strong indictment of the normalization of competing interests that bordered on greed and selfishness. Jay Gatsby, the novel’s principal and central character, seems to know everybody and yet is still somehow unknown to everyone. Gatsby is an extremely ambitious young man who challenges and breaks out of the shackles of social stratification with the abundant fortune he obtains throughout the years by insisting devotion to his pursuit of the American dream. Gatsby also utilizes this massive affluence …show more content…
As the story progresses, the novel rushes to Gatsby's abrupt death as the intricacies of America’s social setup of the 1920’s are brought to the fore. The Great Gatsby’s ending, defined by Gatsby’s death and Nick’s return to the Midwest, represents Fitzgerald’s harsh indictment and forbidding nature of the American dream; as well as the coexistent evisceration, an inevitable reality with bleak consequences, where the wealthy and most successful survive at the expense of achievers such as Gatsby. Gatsby’s death towards the end of the novel is a philosophical abstraction that offers a deeper analysis of the nature of life and being rich during the American economic boom of the 1920s. A close analysis of Gatsby’s character reveals an underlying truth, and justifies the ending of the novel. Both Nick and Gatsby are considered outsiders in a closely knit community of privileged, wealthy individuals represented by Tom Buchanan, Daisy Buchanan, and Jordan Baker. While Tom and Jordan share a long history of aristocracy and affluence and being raised in a privileged environment, Nick and Gatsby embody a completely different class