ipl-logo

V For Vendetta Justified Terrorism

1416 Words6 Pages

V and Justified Terrorism
After seeing the depredation and adversity that terrorism attacks induced, it is of no surprise that terrorism should be viewed with disgust by people. But is terrorism never justified? This question is raised by the action-thriller V for Vendetta, a film directed by James McTeigue and written by the Wachowski Brothers, subject to a graphic novel of the same title. The film illustrates the protagonist V, who uses terrorist approaches to fight against an authoritarian regime that has taken control of Britain sometime in the near future. A related question naturally arises when viewing this film. Is V a rebel or a revolutionary? Is V 's action deriving from outrage, disappointment, rancor, or is it in the because of …show more content…

In any rate, a number of V 's “terrorist acts” are literally revenge executions of the foretasted people. These revenge executions are unquestionably provoked by V 's outrage and acrimony. However, is there any righteous convention leading V 's vendetta? The answer to this question can be found in the emotions themselves. Anger is an emotional response to an anticipated injustice. Humans and other animals share this response. For example, if one tries to take away a piece of meat from a bear, the bear will respond by growling, shrilling, and even hitting the person. Many species of animals respond destructively when other animals amble into their notable territory. In a very real sense, these animals’ destruction is a response to what they identify as “injustices” (Mueller 78). Correspondingly, human outrage is an emotional response to a case or an action that one identifies as being unjust or unfair. By all means, when determining a person’s outrage, it is thoroughly proper to ask whether his outrage is justified. It means whether his identification of an injustice is a solid perception or not. Sometimes one can be angry over minor, unimportant issues. This is certainly not V. If anyone ought to be outraged, it would be …show more content…

For instance, Nazi Germany eventually surrendered not until it was at last encroached from the east by Russia and from the west by the United States. Its demolition was necessary because its own citizens had no hope on overthrowing its fascist regime. Hirohito 's Japan belatedly surrendered on August 15, 1945, six days after the bombardment of Nagasaki not until it confronted with the chance of total nuclear demolition. Countless number of lives was taken away in the battle to conquer these authoritarian governments, but innumerable more passed away under the hands of these authorities. In comparison, V 's terrorism appears to be nearly

Show More
Related
609 Words | 3 Pages

In The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

As World War II kept raging on in 1945, the US decided that they were going to end the Second World War with an action that is still remembered even in today's time. During World War II, the US made a tough but reasonable decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to finally end the war between Japan and to end the Second World War. With the more and more wins that American had against Japan, Japan would not surrender and rather commit suicide and take out as many US lives as possible with them. After witnessing these horrific actions of the Japanese soldiers, Marine captain Justice Chamber says about how to win the war against Japan even though they won’t surrender is, “How to defeat an enemy that could not, would not admit defeat?... “To win the war and get it over with, just kill off many of the other sides, make it terrible, and the war will stop”(Doc3).

Read More
249 Words | 1 Pages

Highly, debatable topic President Truman’s decision on dropping atomic bomb on Japan during World war II. Many questions arise when this topic is raised like the world was introduced to the nuclear bombs, it was racist to drop bombs in japan, was Truman’s main target Asian or was it for the political reestablishment between Soviet Union, as German was America’s first attack why he did not drop atom bomb on them and so on. As it has already become more than seventy years it is still amongst the debated ones. It was best decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan by President Truman considering different factors like ending the war as soon as possible, responding to the pearl harbor, to impress the Soviet, lack of having incentives not to use bomb and justify the cost of Manhattan project.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Document 33 shows a propaganda shows the amount of damage the bombs would do, Japan still did not surrender. Another piece of evidence is document 71: I know the Japanese intimately. The Japanese will not crack. They will not crack morally or psychologically or economically, even when eventual defeat stares them in the face.

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

The United States invasion of Japan led to numerous casualties and severe damage yet Japan stood its ground, proving it would fight to the death. At times violence is the answer; Japan had no intention of surrendering, no matter the consequence. U.S. Secretary of war, Henry Stimson, confirms that “only the complete destruction of her military power could open the way to lasting peace”.(Document B) Each day brought great suffering, and the only logical solution to dealing with millions of suicidal soldiers was to kill off the problem. After the Japanese repeatedly refused to surrender the United States was forced to put its nuclear warfare to use and bomb both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, doing what they believed was their only

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

This resulted in the surrender of the Japanese on August 14, 1945. Military analyst suggest that Japan was on their knees, and about to surrender. The atomic bombs were unnecessary. Later, critics even stated that the atomic bombs were a form of racism, and it would have never happened if it were on white Americans. Truman insisted that his decision was a military action, and should not be looked at any other way.

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

In this regard, the reign of terror was not justified because the conflicts that they have fought and also could have been avoided to not let the people who wanted freedom to die without the taste of it. There are ways to avoid conflict and to not take some threats as something to deal with the first so you don’t stress your people's freedom by being in

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

Was the beheading of 40,000 country men plus the King of France really needed to fuel this “Democratic” revolution? In 1789 new ideas such as life liberty and equality shook the government of France. With these new ideas came a new government with new taxes and rules. These rules enforced people to follow revolutionary ideas and if you did not want to follow these ideas you were beheaded. The King of France, King Louis XVI was beheaded in order to fuel this revolution.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

In The Outrage Industry, Berry and Sobieraj argue that the topic of media outrage is very multidimensional. Outrage is defined as avstrong reaction with anger, shock, or rage. In the political context, this could be how citizens react to a speech a politician has made, commentary between politicians aired on television, and or commentary between political journalists. America loves sensationalism. When the media broadcasts negatively charged reactions between political journalists or politicians, their ratings go up.

Read More
383 Words | 2 Pages

Both protagonists have endured severe oppression from their totalitarian regime, however, in the end, V was more successful in overthrowing the injustice government V was the sole survivor of the illegal genetic testing done by the government in order to further understand human’s ability to survive epidemic and diseases. He went through unimaginable torment, he suffered memory loss and underwent physical abuse. After being tormented in Larkhill Concentration Camp, he is scarred for life. What is done to him is horrendous.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6,1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki were attacked by atomic bombs that were dropped by the U.S Military. Over 200,000 people were killed. The United States used the bomb to end the war with Japan, which began in 1941 when Japan launched an unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. Many people believe that dropping the atomic bombs was the right thing to do because if they did not use it, there would be four more years of fighting and hundreds of thousands more US soldiers would have died because the Japanese refused to surrender.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

Taking Japan’s impending surrender into consideration, the usage of the atomic bombs was militarily unnecessary and immoral. Further, it lead to the extensive loss of civilian life, therefore making these bombings justifiable only to a lesser extent. However, supporters of the bombings generally are of the opinion that they were instrumental in the Japanese surrender. These supporters also believe

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

During the 1930s, fascism was spreading across Europe leading to authoritarian governments such as Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire. The war with Japan was still going on at the time of Germany’s surrender. The United States made the bold decision on August 6th and 9th, 1945 to drop an atomic on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in an attempt to end the war. The dropping of the bomb led to approximately 200,000 deaths in Japan, but shortly after the Japanese announced their surrender. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima during August 1945, although inhumane, was necessary to end World War II because of the increased Japanese aggression during the war, their refusal to make peace with the Allies, and using

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Intimidation to the brim On August 1945, America dropped an atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The explosion over Hiroshima wiped out 95 percent of the city and killed 80,000 people. Thousands more would die of radiation exposure. Two days later an atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 50,000 people.

Read More
1976 Words | 8 Pages

Was the dropping of the Atomic bombs justified? On the 6th of August 1945, the first of two atomic bombs was dropped onto the city of Hiroshima by the US plane Enola Gay. On the 9th of August 1945, three days later, the second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were cities in Japan.

Read More

More about V For Vendetta Justified Terrorism

Related Topics

Open Document