ipl-logo

What Are The Ethical Issues Surrounding Organ Allocation

1643 Words7 Pages

The aim of this assignment is to describe an ethical dilemma from nursing practice and by using an ethical framework critically analyse the main issues arising from the problem. The essay will discuss the definition of ethics and it will briefly discuss the main theories of ethics. It will examine an ethical dilemma surrounding organ transplantation and it will analyse the conflicts by using the main principles of ethics. Finally, it will give recommendation in relation to ethics and its application to nursing practice.

Ethics is a branch of philosophy which is concerned with defining the concepts of right and wrong and the morality of human actions and decisions (Chaloner, 2007). The terms ethics and morals are generally undifferentiated …show more content…

Consequently, allocating organs to those whose illness was caused by their lifestyle choice is very controversial (Zalewska, 2015). Furthermore, Ubel et al. (2001) found that in a scenario when two people who both need of organ transplant, the public’s distribution preference is affected by whether or not a person’s lifestyle choices caused their illness. All the evidence suggests that those people whose lifestyle choices lead to their disease are in disadvantage when considering organ allocation. However, organ allocation policies recognise the importance of various influencing factors, including compatibility, equity, utility, benefit and fairness (Zalewska, 2015). Wilkinson & Savulescu (2012) identified seven principles that govern organ transplantation, including the principle of maximum utility, the dead donor rule, brain-dead donor rule and non-killing. These are closely linked to the four bioethical principles, but their main focus is on the person who is donating the organs. In Ireland, the Health Service Executive (2014) developed ‘A Framework for Quality and Safety of Human Organs Intended for Transplantation’ to provide guidance in human organ donation, however, currently there are no guidelines for the allocation of available …show more content…

Consequently, the principles of beneficence desire more than just adhering to the principles of nonmaleficence. Beneficence is a central piece of many moral theories. The utilitarian theory is based on the principle of utility, namely, acts are justifiable if they provide the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people (Mandal, Ponnambath & Parija, 2016). According to the principle of utility, it is more beneficial to give an organ to an individual whose illness was not caused by lifestyle choices. There are many evidence supporting this statement. Moss & Siegler (1991) argued that giving equal priority to patients whose illness is a consequence of their lifestyle, could reduce public support for transplant programs. Furthermore, Agthoven et al. (2001) found that transplantation for acute liver failure is less expensive than those for chronic liver failure (consequence of long-term alcohol abuse). However, the principle of utility is often criticized that it places the society’s interest over individual interests and rights (Beauchamp & Childress,

Show More
Related
930 Words | 4 Pages

The story, “Kidneys for Sale: A Reconsideration” opinion favors both sides of the argument. Miriam Schulman creates a well-balanced stance on how she feels about the selling of organs. The article was first published in 1988 by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. Ten years later

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

We have the responsibility to protect and help those less fortunate, but we cannot let our own ideals cloud the issues at hand” (MacKay 158). By providing an argument about moral issues, MacKay is better able to provide a new perspective to the reader and perhaps a new mindset. Additionally, MacKay claims those awaiting for the benefits of a transplant, including the buyer and seller would discredit those who claim this process is morally wrong. Due to the fact that not many people can relate to the situation of the buyer and seller, MacKay questions our moral stances and if they are worth depriving thousands of people from a chance to live. Not only would the patient be suffering, but the poor would as well, the author claims, “There are other people so poor that the sale of a kidney is worth the profit...

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Choice of Life or Death Choosing between life or death is not a decision that you want to make. Of course pretty much everyone is going to choose life over death, but is some cases you don’t have that choice. In the article “Organ Sales Will Save Lives”, written by the author Joanna MacKay, she presents an argument about whether or not the sale of organs should be legalized. She builds her credibility by giving numerous facts, examples, and statistics on the argument. People die everyday waiting and hoping to get the call about finding a match for a kidney so that they can have a kidney transplant done.

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

Some people are against organ donation in this world because there’s people waiting for a transplant. A man kills his wife, equalled up to fifteen stabs (Schlessinger). Then, he was rushed to the hospital to get a transplant because he tried to commit suicide by drinking rat poison (Schlessinger). Passing two thousand people on the New York transplant list and gets an organ before anyone else on the waiting list (Schlessinger). That whole situation is that he should’ve been at the end of the waiting list and waited like everyone else had to, but in my mind is that they only cared if he was gonna die or live.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

In Joanna MacKay's article, 'Organ Selling Will Save Lives", sides with the legalization of organ selling, due to her main focus she emphasizes on kidney failure. In ignorance of government, patients all over the globe are dying on the wait for a kidney transplant. She presents her ideas that government should not prohibit the sale of organs. She writes "lives shouldn’t be wasted they should be saved". Her thesis is understandable and she supports it with good reasons.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

During the previous decades, society’s behavior with regard to organ donation remains reluctant. A survey showed that although people plainly accept to offer their organs for transplantation, when a person dies, his or her relatives often refuse donation. To be able

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

In 2017, 510 people deceased donors donated their organs, saving over 1,400 people, and giving them the gift of organ donation. In 2017. ‘The most important thing that helps a family's decision is their knowing the donation decision of their loved one' (Donate Life, 2017) only 60% of Australians discuss their wishes for organ donation with their family, meaning the other 40% of Australian families are more than likely to decline organ donation, this is one of the biggest barriers for Australian organ donation. Also, during a conducted survey between the year 12 health class and other students, within figure 1, it can be shown that only 13.4% of people were registered to become an organ donor in Australia, compared to Australia's 76% (Transplant Australia, 2016). Furthermore, 40% of Australians don’t know if their religion supports organ and tissue donation, and 20% of families that declined donation in 2014 did so out of religious or cultural concerns, this amount is huge, if people who were educated in whether or not their religion accepts organ donation, a whole 20% of families would allow their loved one to proceed with organ and tissue transplantation, this barrier is one of the largest ones to date.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

In the United States alone, 19 people die every day waiting on an organ transplant that could have saved their lives. The only solution to this problem is getting more drivers registered as organ donors. It has been proposed that the states automatically register their drivers as donors and it is up to the drivers to go through the procedure of opting out if that is what they wish. I agree with this proposal because you still have the freedom to make your choice but most people would not want to go through the process of opting out, so the number of organ donors would be greatly increased.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

In today 's society, people have a choice whether or not they want to be an organ donor, but many people die each day waiting for a perfect match. Though death is a tragic event, many people can benefit from it. Organ Donation should be required because an increase in donations can save a numerous amount of lives, inform the public about the science, and lower the statistical numbers in America. Increasing Organ Donation will be highly appreciated by the people, along with saving more lives each and everyday. By choosing to donate, the recipients are giving the suffering a second chance at life.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

We need a way to save these lives, and we have one: Organ donation. When you become an organ donor, you can saves the lives up to eight people. Controversy surrounds this option for many reasons, and some do not find this option to be ethical but most believe it is what God’s calls us to do. The Catholic sees it as love and charity.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The act Donating Organs, either prior to death or after death, is considered by many to be one of the most generous, selfless and worthwhile decisions that one could make. The decision to donate an organ could mean the difference of life or death for a recipient waiting for a donor. Organ donations offer patients new chances at living more productive, healthy and normal lives and offers them back to families, friends and neighborhoods. Despite the increasing number of donor designations in the past few years, a shortage still exists in donors.

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

Ethical Issues in Healthcare There are many ethical issues facing health care at any time and it is impossible to say definitively which is the most pressing or the most important. Health care professionals are expected to base their practice on a set of ethical principles, including truthfulness, beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and confidentiality. Ethical issues can arise, however, when a l professional is called upon to act in opposition to personal values or in cases where the values of patient, health care worker, and sponsoring institution conflict. The following issues are presented in no order. Neonatal Ethics Neonates are babies within their first twenty-eight days of life.

Read More
1409 Words | 6 Pages

Adding kidneys to the accepted list of organ sales can cause an uproar both good and bad, but may overall benefit those in need. The process of organ donations in the United States is an unstable procedure, but with the improvement in the system black markets can be stopped, awareness can be improved, and more lives will be saved. The effects and outcomes from those in need of a transplant are quite impressive. As of August 2017, 116,000 men, women, and children were on the national transplant waiting list.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

This assignment is a reflection of ethical dilemmas in nursing practice as a registered nurse; this paper is based on the group assignment which was completed for NURS3004. This reflection will include an explanation of the role that I portrayed in the group, the preparation that I did for the role, what could have been done differently, how this group assignment has impacted me in terms of working in a team and finally explain how this assignment will assist me in my future clinical practice as a newly registered nurse. The role that I played in the group was a patient who has a mental health disorder and I didn’t want his mother to know about the illness, as a front it seemed as though we had a close relationship. When my mother leaves the room I asked the nurse to keep my illness confidential as she does not really understand it.

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

A person who is living and wishes to donate should be sure that they have no disease like cancer or heart disease and have an overall healthy body. People also need to consider that as the potential donor must consider the possibility of adverse health effects after donation—as well as the potential to save the life of the recipient, who may be a loved one. Donating when alive is a hard decision to make because of the complications you may experience, most people would in a heartbeat for a loved one, but don’t think about their safety also. There are some organs in which you can donate and most cases would be okay. When someone you loves needs a life saving organ and you’re willing to give them yours, you have to remember that then you are in need of a organ and you will be put onto the waiting

Read More

More about What Are The Ethical Issues Surrounding Organ Allocation

Related Topics

Open Document