ipl-logo

Explain Beveridge's Economic Motives For Imperialism

816 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cultural difference between native americans and us

What were Beveridge's economic motives for imperialism?
Beveridge’s economic motives for imperialism derived from industrialization and the current economic growth America was already witnessing. This was the period where industrialization was growing at a rapid pace not only in the United States but worldwide. He made the case that the opposition was correct in resisting imperialism in the past because there was no need for new land back then. However, in this new period of time, the need to take control of new land was prominent for America's economy “but the Opposition is right—there is a difference. We did not need the western Mississippi Valley when we acquired it, nor Florida, nor Texas, nor California, nor the royal provinces of the …show more content…

Ugarte argued that America was able to manipulate foreign countries by making them believe that the United States intentions in a foreign land were benevolent in improving their nation “In this manner, it has proceeded to create subconsciously, in the countries it has “manipulated,” a peculiar state of mind” (Ugarte). He believed that the United States was better equipped to imperialize foreign territories than past conquerors because history had shown America what worked and what could work even better. Ugarte thought the United States was “implacable in its greed” and due to its intelligence through histories imperialism, it was better informed on how to carry it out. According to Ugarte not only did America had the knowledge of past imperialism they had the capability, the greed, passion and information to carry it out “with a breath of vision embracing many centuries, better informed and more resolute than any, without fits of passion, without forgetfulness, without fine sensibilities, without fear, carrying out a world activity in which everything is seen” (Ugarte). He thought that the United States gained influence because it knew how to make foreign countries believe that their intentions were good and would only benefit them “North American Imperialism is the perfect instrument of domination which has been known throughout the ages”

Show More
Related
1298 Words | 6 Pages

During the period spanning from 1800 to 1855, there were many arguments made in the ever-present debate regarding the possibility of the territorial expansion of the United States. The two arguments, pro-expansion and anti-expansion, were seen in debates over the Louisiana Purchase, the War of 1812, the removal of Indians from their territories, possible trade routes through expansion, and the Mexican-American War. These arguments made in the debate are seen in documents A, B, C, D, F, G, H, and I. The documents not only show the opinions of the people, but also the effect they had on the government. Pro-expansion sentiments were shown through debates concerning the War of 1812, the removal of Indians from their villages, possible

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

The first division is a chronological account of the volatile political and diplomatic shifts of control and identity. In the first four chapters the evolution of the Lower Mississippi valley is meticulously examined. The initial establishment of France at Biloxi Bay in 1699 and the economic interest they had with the native Indians proved to have devastating impacts on the region. The undesirable conduct of the Indians motivated the Europeans colonist to export the Indians to the Caribbean in exchange for African slaves which would lead to a sequence of colonial wars and constant conflict with the Indians. Also covered in this section is the lack of imperial interest and the insufficient profit which facilitated the self-sufficient regional level “frontier exchange economy.”

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

In the aforementioned warfare, the US not only sent its army to legitimize its sovereignty over Afghanistan and Iraq, but it also conspired to take democratization as an excuse to uncover its real intention of gaining profit. To recapitulate, not only does imperialism exist in Belgian Congo in the eighteenth and nineteenth century, but also in Middle-East in the twenty-first

Read More
1562 Words | 7 Pages

Influential figures such as Henry Clay and Andrew Jackson had “made their mark in politics after moving West”, and westward expansion engendered the establishment of technology such as canals and railroads (326). As America grew, however, so did the questions and issues surrounding the issue of slavery. Manifest Destiny was not just a catalyst for the expanse of slavery, but a hindrance as well, as the United States began to divide over this key issue in regard to whether a newly-acquired territory should be designated as free or slave. Though attempts were made at compromise, the spread of slavery through Manifest Destiny proved to be both the driving force for territorial expansion, as land was acquired in order to grow more, but also the challenge for it, as the continued growth of slavery and territory forced the United States to finally approach the issue and decide whether it would remain a divided country, or finally become united in its social, economic, and political

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

Doc. 3).Therefore, imperialism was pushed for by many Americans in a hope to spread US

Read More
1764 Words | 8 Pages

As America became a great power, it has continued its legacy of territorial expansionism through neo-imperialist policies. Aside from acquiring land and expanding American territory, the United States has established policies that have allowed direct and often indirect military and political control, economic exploitation, and the introduction of American ideals. The U.S. has justified this form of colonialism by claiming that it is for mutual economic pursuits, the spreading of democracy, and the establishment of stable governments in developing countries. Despite America’s noble causes, American imperialism has caused many repercussions. The United States should cease to be an imperialist power as it is economically damaging to countries under its rule, costly to America, violates the fundamental American principle of self-governance, and exacerbates social and political situations in countries America has tampered with.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Beveridge believe that we should just be able to do what other country can do, while Obama focuses on what would be best for the country; basically staying out of wars when they can be avoidable. Beveridge’s response to why we should imperialize other countries is not necessarily how it’s beneficial to our country, but more of its “fair” and we’d be more “equal” to other countries since their governing foreign countries as well. He believes that since we can do it, we should just expand our territory. He thinks that Americans should continue with the march toward commercial supremacy of the World, not even considering any of the outcomes. His strong nationalism is only focusing about the power America can get by doing what every other country may be doing, imperializing.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

Gail Bederman from the university of Notre Dame claims that Theodore Roosevelt, who was the greatest supporter of the attack on Spain and Philippines, had it engineered by both race and gender. These two concepts made him perceive imperialism as being the next stage of growth in a healthy republic. To him, expansion and domination were necessary if America was to civilize the world. For people like Theodore Roosevelt, as the United States advanced, the democratic vision was also progressing (Bederman, 1996). Theodore Roosevelt, just elected to office in 1882, felt that he was very important and had many ambitions.

Read More
1662 Words | 7 Pages

“Done at Madrid, this 11th date of August, 1803,”. When Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe bought the land from France in eighteen o’ three they together changed the lives and cultures of hundreds to thousands of native americans, frenchmen, and even current and future americans by starting land battles and century-long feuds. Along with these bad things they also started some good things like increasing trade, mining, and agriculture. Jefferson and Monroe more than doubled the size of America for the small price of $fifteen million dollars, but also for the larger price of more wars, deaths, and greed on american soil. Some people however still believe that the price of the land was too big of a price to pay for what we received in the end,

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

During the “Gilded Age” period of American history, development of the Trans-Mississippi west was crucial to fulfilling the American dream of manifest destiny and creating an identity which was distinctly American. Since the west is often associated with rugged pioneers and frontiersmen, there is an overarching idea of hardy American individualism. However, although these settlers were brave and helped to make America into what it is today, they heavily relied on federal support. It would not have been possible for white Americans to settle the Trans-Mississippi west without the US government removing Native Americans from their lands and placing them on reservations, offering land grants and incentives for people to move out west, and the

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

As for the western land, struggles over the state and national authority over the Native Americans affairs which were critical to sustain. Yet, the creation of two imperial superintendents was to manage relations with the tribes, the assertions of British’s rights to Native lands and a settlement boundary from the Proclamation of 1763 reserving territory west of the Appalachian crest for Native nations (Ablavsky, 2014). Therefore, it took eighteen years for the federal government to cede all states’ western land, as a result of the Continental Congress granting Virginia and large landowner’s “reserves of small land in the west (Schultz, 2010). With the government lacking the authoritative control, it could not regulate foreign trade or interstate commerce leaving states control over their own trade policies and unable to protect the manufacturing and shipping from the inability to establish commerce and economic

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

United States Imperialism in the late 19th century was very selfish time. Many people in that time, debated about whether are not benefiting our country was the right way or the wrong way. The motiving factors that impacted our imperialism are economic, military, and cultural. These factors impacted the American Imperialism from 1890-194 by having control over weaker territories meeting our expanding needs.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

O’Sullivan was an American columnist whom was known for his use of the term, “manifest destiny,” which promoted the annexation of Texas to the United States. He argues that the adverse attitude toward Texas’ independence from Mexico needs to end. In this article, O’Sullivan also expands on the importance of the growth of the country throughout the continent. It further acknowledges the freedom of Texas as not a rebellion, but by abandonment from Mexico. John O’Sullivan sees the future of America expanding into California and Mexico becoming a country without a real government.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

Before the 20th century the United States was an isolationist nation but around the late 19th century America decided to convert into an imperialist power. They had numerous reasons to shift into being an imperialist nation. America didn’t want to begin imperializing to settle and live in the nations they were taking over, they already had America for that reason, they wanted to adopt these nations for what they had to offer, which was many things. America saw an opportunity to improving their nation and took it. Even if there were many causes for America to imperialize, three of them stood out the most.

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

At these times, and even in today’s society; The more money you have, the more say you have in government and what goes down. (Document 3) In conclusion, imperialist use imperialism to take control over other colonies/countries to expand the borders, or to acquire vital resources. Imperialism was good because although certain leaders came around who were power hungry, many leaders wanted to build and help civilize their country. Imperialism has been the most powerful force in world

Read More

More about Explain Beveridge's Economic Motives For Imperialism

Related Topics

Open Document