After all, they had more troops and they were better trained. There were many factors, though, that led to their defeat. Just like in the Revolutionary War, the British underestimated the Americans, and that was their main issue. Arrogance was a factor in this. Admiral Cochrane, for example, would not accept his men’s plan of how to move the barges from the bayou and instead wasted days executing his plan of how to do it (128).
The Cotton Diplomacy failed because of three things. The South not knowing the risks of what could happen. Bad decisions made by the South that made most of the Confederacy starve. Also not thinking that France and England could go to other countries to get cotton.
Even though the main focus was on America, England still played a role while King George
4. How did the Great War for Empire change the relationship between England and its American colonies? The Great War for Empire, or Seven Years’ War went on between 1756 and 1763. The unfair taxation of the colonists is what sparked this war; there were also several other political and economic factors, which also played a large part.
How could the colonies political objectives be achieved by force of arms? Even though the British army was more experienced and better trained, the Americans soon realized they had too much land for Britain to take over. They used the land to their advantage by letting the British army take over the ports, but the Americans had the rest of the land. The Americans also had the French on their side. The British army was surprised how skilled the Americans were during the war.
As you know being in an army could be quite difficult for soldiers. Both Union soldiers and Confederate soldiers train everyday and do certain duties to get ready for the American Civil War. However, there are huge differences between the two armies. Before the war started, most of the soldiers from both North and South had been farmers. If the Southerners did not farm they either became carpenters, mechanics, merchants, machinist, lawyers, teachers, blacksmiths, or a dentist.
Therefore, the reason that the actions of the colonists worked is because of the strain that the War had put on Britain’s
Civil War Leading up to and during the civil war both the North and the South ran into many troubles along the way leading to the climax of the combat. The North going into the war had a more widespread army that almost tripled at times the amount of soldiers claimed by the south and more support coming from many different sources. However, military leadership was not very adequate towards the onset and, the amount of desertions from the north almost doubled that of the south. The south on the other hand had quite capable leadership from beginning till end having more of passion going in to the conflict but, many variables that the south predicted to go about didn’t quite come to fruition thus, ultimately causing the souths hierarchy to crumble. Coming into the civil war the
Thus the British could not capture the capital, which would end the war. The British had people in the colonies that were loyal to them, and used them to preserve control in the colonies. Though, when it came to using them in battle, the British Commanders chose not to. They did not trust them and felt that they lacked good fighting skills; this alienated possible collaborators.
Britain introduced trade restrictions in 1807, impeding trade between France and neutral countries. The U.S. opposed this, since it violated international laws. With American merchant marines significantly growing in size at the time, Britain was worried about the increasing competition. Another major reason the U.S. declared war against Britain was the impressment of sailors into the British Royal Navy. The process of impressment is the act of forcing men into a navy, and this is exactly what Britain did.
The English had been a dominant military force against the French throughout the Hundred Year war, this meant the treaty requiring military reinforcement was not a problem initially. The tides turned for the French at the siege of Orleans, which some attribute the triumph of to Joan of Arc. Regardless of whether Joan of Arc actually was the military mastermind behind the victory, or if she did fight, she provided a fresh revival and symbol under which people could rally and unite together for the Dauphin- or against the English. The most crucial factor of Joan of Arc’s contribution to the war was the reaction of the English to her. The duke of Bedford was scared of her presence, they paid an incredible sum of money for her, invoked old customs
Britain had to find a new way of controlling the Colonies. Before the war, England pursued
Time and again, John had launched attacks and watched in despair as his deputies and allies had mis-timed their own attacks, failed to combine or coordinate defence in the face of a better-organised and highly motivated enemy, and eventually his allies had gone into Battle at Bouvines, whilst John himself was still in the south of France, against inferior numbers but an army that was well-organised and which easily defeated John’s
Germany had recently taken over Poland and was dominating Europe. At this point France was lost and it was evident that the British could no longer afford to stay in France.
France ultimately wanted Britain not to be too powerful and in order todo so they had to be weakened by having the Americans win there
