ipl-logo

Explanation Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

502 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Immanual Kant view on ethics

According to Kant, he believes that our actions must conform to the Categorical Imperative. Kant supported that moral obligations arise when other people are not involved. He also argued that we have a perfect duty for ourselves not to commit suicide. Kant believed that certain types of actions such as lying, suicide, and murder, and stealing were prohibited. Our moral actions are based on the categorical imperative because our moral actions are that cannot be opt out or claim that it doesn’t apply to us.

Kant says that as a general guideline for action, just show me what my duty is I should “act so that I could will that my maxim could become a universal law.” Kant means to decide whether to act or in what way to act. Asking yourself what is the rule of principle, or maxim upon which I’m acting. If the principle of universal law for everyone, the action is my duty and it’s morally right to do. If there is a difficulty of the maxim being a universal law, then the action is not my duty and would be wrong to perform that can of action. Maxim is the rule or principle on which we act on. …show more content…

We should respect all human beings impartially and avoid exploiting anyone. Means refers to any action carried out for the purpose of achieving something else as an end. Kant stated that it is immortal to use another person merely as a means to an end and people be treated as ends in

Show More
Related
1090 Words | 5 Pages

The implication of this being that in order for an action to be moral why it is done must be able to be why it is done by anyone, anywhere, at any time. A clear example of this imperative comes when one considers lying. If one lies and presumes that lie to be moral, that lie must then be able to be made the universal law. If lying were the universal law one could not lie as lying relies on truth-telling as universal law to serve its function. In his second formulation, Kant states "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means."

Read More
1985 Words | 8 Pages

Categorical Imperative and Duties Kant divides duties into two groups- duties towards others and duties towards self. They are further subdivided into strict and meritorious duties. Lets consider these duties one by one in light of Categorical Imperative. Strict Duties to others : Consider a person is in need of money.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Evaluating moral actions solely based on intention disregards the potential harm that may result despite good intentions. Kant himself acknowledges the duty to be charitably helpful, but the actual impact of our actions should not be ignored. For instance, donating money to a charitable organization with noble intentions may not effectively alleviate the intended problem if the funds are misused. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of moral goodness necessitates the integration of both intention and outcomes. By considering the broader ethical implications and impact of our actions, we can navigate the complexities of moral decision-making and strive for outcomes that align with our moral

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always atthe same time as an end and never merely as a means to an end (Kant,

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

Based on this principle Kant proposed that all good actions must be motivated by duty or goodwill, termed as the formulation of goodwill. According to Kant, the only genuinely moral thing is a goodwill. In his formulation of humanity, Kant states that humans can never be used as a means to an end but rather should be viewed as an end themselves. This point is used to argue against activities like extramarital affairs, Prostitution, and pornography. The final formulation states that people are bound by the laws of morality by their own

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

Due this it creates many possible maxims that could happen, because everyone makes up their own maxims. In order for an action to be absolutely ban, we would have “to be sure in advance that, of

Read More
3638 Words | 15 Pages

Since the golden rule does not actually specify what we should do, this vagueness of the golden rule points to the reciprocity of considering people. For example, it would also not make sense for me to criticize someone else for, say, breaking the speed limit if I then went and broke it myself, for Kant, it is a sure sign of its subjectivism, it does not indicate the essence or the content of morality, therefore its inadequacy as a foundation of moral philosophy. In this thesis, I will explicate CI2 expresses Kant’s genuinely universal moral system requires that I do not break speed limit, not because of the psychological concerning or consequences, but I treat others as humanity or ends, not merely means. (See my further discussion in

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

While not without criticism, Kant's ethical theory provides an objective standard for moral decision-making that focuses on the intention behind actions, rather than their outcomes (Kant,

Read More
371 Words | 2 Pages

Kant believes that a person has the responsibility to discover their individual talents. He thinks living on the streets would be an unreasonable decision to make. Wolff says “ Do what makes you and your condition, or that of others more perfect; omit what makes it less perfect.” (Fieser pg.175) He believes that exact statement is the fundamental law of nature. Kant suggests that morality is not determined from traditional authorities but strictly relies on human reason.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

This principle would thus be “universalizable” because everyone would agree on following it. For example, if we want to lie, we would ask ourselves if we would be okay with everyone else lying to us. Also, if our country was deciding to start a war, we should be alright with other countries declaring war on us. With this formulation, we make moral decisions because we would only behave how we want others to behave with us. However, Kant states that there shouldn’t be a contradiction, but there is a possibility that there are people who think differently and would be alright with lying, stealing,

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

The author says, “When I think myself in want of money, I will borrow money and promise to repay it, although I know I never can do so.” (Marino 218), and he poses the question, “How would it be if my maxim were a universal law?” (Marino 218). The answer is simple. If everybody failed to keep their promises, then no one will be loyal to others and we will all live in a world full of lies.

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

I hope to convince the reader that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the better way to live a morally conscious life and more practical to follow as well. First I will briefly describe both Kant’s and Mill’s principles. Then I will go on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of both. Finally, I hope to provide a counterargument for some of Kant’s Categorical Imperatives downfalls. Kant states the Categorical Imperative as: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law."

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

Another concept in Kant’s Grounding of the Metaphysic of Morals is perfect duty. Perfect duties as those that are not flexible; there are no exceptions of these duties. According to Kant, “Not committing suicide is an example of a perfect duty to oneself” (30). There are no exceptions to allow a person to commit suicide and it should never

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

Brave New World is hundred years to the future; human life forms have been almost completely ruled by the Controllers (government). The novel is set off with an expedition, which starts in the labtory, (examining the process of creation and conditioning). The first chapter establishes the tone of dehumanization life towards the civilization. The past of natural process (birth, sexual relationship, and growing) has been a sign of hatred in this society, making this the new future “reproductive technology.” Furthermore, the people forgets about the past and believes “History is bunk" (Pg 34), using this excuse of the past to bring better advancement technology to their world.

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Kant believes that most people know right from wrong; the problem most people have is not in knowing what is morally, but in doing it. Kant also argued that rightness or wrongness of particular acts is determined by rules; these rules could be determined by his principle of universalizability. He also argued reason require not only that moral duties be universal but also absolutely binding. For instance, when lying is the only option to save someone’s life, still we shall not lie for it is morally wrong to lie. Kant introduced categorical imperative which states that people ought to do something regardless of the consequences.

Read More

More about Explanation Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

Related Topics

Open Document