ipl-logo

Explanations For The Strength Of The President Of Russia

748 Words3 Pages

It appears that throughout history, the Russian Federation has always possessed strong leaders: even now, in an attempt to at least imitate democracy, a convincing argument states that the president of Russia possesses wide-ranging powers. Yet, it is not always clear as to what it is that makes the president so strong within the Russian system of governance, which is the core topic of this essay. However, before commencing this type of research, it is necessary to define the type of governmental system within which Russia operates. Only then would it be plausible to assess the potential explanations for the strength of the president of Russia. This investigation assesses those arguments which appear to be most convincing; namely, the constitutional …show more content…

However, Colton and Skach (2005) go further than this definition arguing that Russia is a subtype of presidentialism coined ‘divided minority government’, with its defining characteristic being that neither the president nor the prime minister possess the legislative majority. Thus, tensions between the president and the prime minister are inherent in such systems. This was clearly the case in Russia when Yeltsin, the first ever elected president of the Russian Federation, proposed a new constitution in 1993 following the collapse of the Soviet Union in order to break with its authoritarian-like laws. During the 1990s, both the president and the chairman of the Supreme Soviet (in this case possessing similar qualities to that of a prime minister) “treated the government apparatus as beholden to them” (Colton and Skach, p.118), initiating opposing legislative proposals. Therefore, it would appear plausible to define the Russian system of the 1990s as a ‘divided minority government’. The tensions that had built between Yeltsin and the parliament resulted in the former using force to dissolve a democratically elected parliament and later implement the new constitution, as well as extensive powers to the president, and potentially leading to a constitutional dictatorship. (Colton and Skach,

Show More
Related
699 Words | 3 Pages

The restart of a central government demonstrates that the majority of people resented government ideas, and that these needed to be taken over by one that’s unbiased and listens to the demands of the

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

The new Constitution required a considerably more brought together government with significantly more power. Now I will give a chance to analyze the progressions

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Back in the 20th century, Russia was a country known as the Soviet Union. On December 25, 1991, however, the Soviet Union came to an end. When the Soviet Union ended, the country was then renamed to Russia. In this essay, we will compare and contrast the Soviet Union with the current U.S and Russian governments. There are many differences between the Soviet Union and The Russian and U.S governments.

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

Book Review: The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down Tim Merlino Drexel University November 2017 The patient-doctor relationship recognizes transference affects as a bi-directional relationship which affects the way a health care provider treats a patient and the way the patient responds to treatment (Zinn, 1990). Fadiman’s book examines different problems in the culture of American medicine by highlighting a tragedy centered around a Hmong immigrant family and their sick child, Lia, in California (Fadiman, 2012). The story also highlights some important lessons to be learned by the American health care system to avoid future incidents like described by Fadiman and to ultimately apply cultural competency in public health (Fadiman, 2012).

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

Additionally, the Russian government runs on a federation while the United States operates on a Constitution-based federal republic; having a strong democratic tradition. About the Legal System, Russia mainly uses the civil law system which in other words is the judicial review of legislature acts, and the U.S. government uses the Common Law System which is based on the English Common Law from the federal level; using state legal systems based on Common Law except for Louisiana. Lastly, relating to the basis of executive legitimacy, Russia’s presidency is independent of legislature meaning the ministry focused on the parliamentary confidence, while the U.S. presidency is independent of primarily the

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

It is being said that the president is stripping power away from other branches of the government which in turn creates democratic weaknesses. Page 2 It is understood that the US constitution actually limits the power of the president, or uses his or her power in the wrong fashion. When the constitution was written 200 years ago, the world was so different.

Read More
400 Words | 2 Pages

The concept of divided government means that one political party can control the executive branch, the presidency, while another controls the legislative branch, congress. Divided government is primarily caused by voter turnout in presidential elections versus voter turnout in non-presidential elections. Presidential elections have a higher turnout of voters who vote for a single party while non-presidential elections have a significantly low voter turnout. “The majority of voters who turn out to the polls tend to be those who dislike the president 's new policies or are extremely politically engaged. Those who feel just okay about the government aren 't likely to show up at polls” (Rainer Benz).

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Uruguay is a country in the southeastern region of South America. Uruguay is bordered by Argentina and Brazil. The "Rio de la Plata" which is also known as the Silver River, is south of Uruguay and the Atlantic Ocean is Southeast. 3.3 million People call Uruguay their home. 1.8 million reside in the metropolitan area of its capital and the largest city, Montevideo.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

I covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Through his role model of a true leader and his great charisma he influenced the Russian citizens to contribute towards his vision of a greater Russia. Vladimir Putin is seen, as a strong leader with brilliant psychological skills that had the power and will to make the decisions and take crazy risks, which he thought, was right for Russian citizens. He was highly people oriented since he new the culture and came from the same background as many Russian individuals and he new what they exactly needed and wanted in a president. But on the contrary his management background helped him to direct and control the Russian citizens by coordinating and harmonizing them to accomplish a mutual goal that was based on their needs and wants. Vladimir Putin created strategies, policies based on the Russian culture, values and views.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Bagehot once described this feature “as the close union…of the executive and legislative powers.” Unlike the presidential system, which is in operation in the USA, the parliamentary

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

Conclusion: Page 6 6. Bibliography: Page 6 Introduction: This an age old argument on whether the people should be ruled by one single all powerful leader who isn’t challenged or a leader who is democratically elected into power. In this academic piece I will be looking at the benefits and pitfalls of each form of government as well as give a few examples of each and decide if they were successful.

Read More

More about Explanations For The Strength Of The President Of Russia

Related Topics

Open Document