ipl-logo

Lack Of Presidential Power In The United States

555 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Powers of the american President

A unitary executive is a presidential executive that has total and complete control of the executive branch and related agencies. (Lau, T., & Johnson, L., 2014) Personally, I believe there are times when a president needs to go ahead and execute his presidential powers, yet I do not believe he or she should use these powers without the knowledge of the two main other branches of the government. The reason I feel that most presidential decisions should be run by the senate and by congress is to make sure that the decision’s being made are in the best interest of our country, as well as making sure that all aspects are looked at to make sure there may not be a better way to handle the issue or issues at hand. I find it so hard to believe that …show more content…

It is being said that the president is stripping power away from other branches of the government which in turn creates democratic weaknesses. Page 2 It is understood that the US constitution actually limits the power of the president, or uses his or her power in the wrong fashion. When the constitution was written 200 years ago, the world was so different. The scope of presidential power then is so different than what it is today. The power of our president today is not just in our country, his or her power effects countries all over the world. Just think at a moment’s notice our president can wage war on any city anywhere. (Scholastic.com, n.d.) Over the years it seems the power of the president has grown and some feel that presidential power should be at the same level as congress. This in turn would serve as a check and balance system. Personally, I feel this level of power would better suit our country, and leave it less vulnerable to possible irrational decisions. (Scholastic.com, n.d.) On the other hand our president should not be a weak indecisive president either. If this were to be the case many countries would take advantage of the situation when they could, and this could lead to our own countries devastation. ( Scholastic.com,

Show More
Related
529 Words | 3 Pages

In the hundreds of years since the US was founded, the role of the President has changed dramatically. From the very beginning of the country to the complexities of the modern era, unexpected changes, including those that could not be predicted by the creators of our constitution, have happened. While the founders fancied a powerful executive, they also imagined that the presidency would work within the constraints set forth in the Constitution and with cooperation with the other branches of the government. This is very clear in the US Constitution as well as Federalist 51, which are the foundations of this country. To begin with, the power of executive orders has expanded the oversight of the role of the President.

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

In May of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, 55 white men gathered together and created the document we know today as the Constitution. So how is it that a document made made over 200 years ago has managed to overcome the ruling of tyranny? Tyranny is the harsh and absolute power in the hands of an individual. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways: federalism, the separation of powers, the checks and balances system, and large v. small states.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

“The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

Regulating the branches of government is crucial to the success of our country, so the constitution laid out the concept of “checks and balances”. For example, the president can veto any bill passed by legislature. In this case, the executive branch checks the legislative branch of government. If this wasn’t possible, congress could pass any bill they want, and ultimately become a powerhouse. These guidelines help keep the government intact, and in turn keep the constitution intact.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

I agree with the Supreme Court on placing emphasizes on keeping the presidential power in check but respecting the doctrine of separation of powers. The Court has the power to hear cases that involve federal questions because the

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout history , presidents have taken different steps in abusing the executive orders and other presidential directives. Many citizens expressed different views over the executive abuse and benefits the presidents have. The increased use of executive legislation in the absence of challenges from Congress has expanded the power, boundaries, and pose a serious threat to the democracy.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

With this assignment, I intend to demonstrate that I have not only read the text, but that I have made reflections on and analyzed the relationship between congress, the President, and the people of this country and the impacts that these changes have had on our current presidency as well as the country as a whole. In order to analyze any form of our current presidency and the strained relationships and constant power struggles that are quite apparent between the presidency, the senate and congress we must first look at the U.S Constitution as a whole. What was the intent of the constitution? Was it purposefully written to implicitly give or deny certain powers to those placed into power?

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The logic of presidential unilateral action appears to be focused on two issues. The first is the nature of when presidents are likely to act unilaterally. The second appears to be how these actions shape the relationship between branches of government. While there seems to be concern as to the institutional effects of an increased use of unilateral action, it seems to be a natural result of ambiguity and institutional limitations on the presidency.

Read More
1725 Words | 7 Pages

Many are taking a gander at an approach to change the framework and others might want to get rid of the framework Understanding the variables that justified the formation of the framework is fundamental. At the point when the constitution was being made, the designers needed to abstain from making a solid official branch. One thought the designers made was to have congress straightforwardly pick the president. Be that as it may, the thought was rejected on the grounds that some felt that settling on this decision would be excessively troublesome and leave ill will in

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

I agree with your post because I do think that our founding father would not agree on the expansion of powers of the president. The three branches of our government was created by our founding father in order to balance out the power of the president, so that neither one branch can have too much power over the nation. When they crafted this idea they had seen other country where there is only one prime minister (North Korea and Russia for example) that overseen every action of a nation which the power was too powerful and decision making can be challenging for the citizens when they cannot vote on new law and regulation.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

One would think that one way to remedy this problem would be to concentration more power in the executive branch. This struggle of power is a problem that is found in many countries. Where do you draw the line for executive powers? When does a system become tyrannical? These two questioned were explored by the Framers, and continue to be the point of contentious debate among

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

In recent years there has been debate on whether or not the president has too much power. The president 's power has increased over the years, I believe that this increase has given the president way too much power. The amount of power that the president has, can cause total destruction and can manipulate people into doing things that they do not actually believe in. A president should not have some of the powers that he possess, but they are given to him simply because he is the leader of the country. In my opinion the president should be allowed certain powers in order to run the country properly, he is also the leader of the country which grants him the right to have certain powers according to the constitution.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Essentially it was supposed to be this way, but presidency’s power is much greater. I do not think the president should be considered the most powerful person in world or in the nation for that matter. I guess the Framers did not foresee presidency to be as powerful as it is; yet I do not believe they would change it. Presidents play two major roles. Their role is chief of state is basically to be the face of the nation.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

This is due to the power of the media, for instance the radio, TV and the Internet. Media has made it easier for the President to communicate with the people, and the modern presidency is a kind of media invention. This power however, doesn’t seem to actually come into action. It just makes people think the President is the most powerful man on the planet. In reality the power, or influence, is divided between more than just the three branches if government.

Read More

More about Lack Of Presidential Power In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document