We often wonder what makes and breaks an organization. Competition? Lack of Innovation? Lack of Resources? Through historical analysis, it is fair to say that motivated people and great leadership are what makes any group successful, be it a business or a country.
The goal to make the Russian empire the best country in the world and a role model for foreign territories flourished among its citizens. Bourgeois traits, or materialistic and money-oriented characters denoted disgraceful nature and proclaimed and enemy of consolidation of the Russian people. The traditional thought endured that no one can attain immense wealth via honest methods. This attitude remained with the Russian peoples following the Great Northern War in 1721, past the 1917 Revolution, past the Soviet Collapse, until today. The essentiality lies within the revolutions in the 1917 and 1991, where their cause lay in political agendas shifting away from the alignment of the Russian culture, furthermore shifting away from people’s expectations of fair leadership. These critical moments are the key to understanding the Russian culture, furthermore empowering
…show more content…
Unfortunately, his successors did not last in the office too long due to illnesses. Constant changes in power did not resonate with the people- they were looking for someone take control, ultimately facing stagnation (World Atlas 1). Gorbachev took power in 1985 creating disputatious capitalist reforms as panacea for all economic and social maladies. No matter how much the Western press praises him for freeing Eastern Europe, the majority of republics of USSR consider him a weak leader and a traitor who tried to establish democracy and market economy at a time when the economy was in a downfall. Instead of following China’s example in establishing "We were well on the way to a civil war and I wanted to avoid that,"As a leader,