ipl-logo

Fair Leadership In Russian Revolutions

1249 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Global culture affects on leadership

We often wonder what makes and breaks an organization. Competition? Lack of Innovation? Lack of Resources? Through historical analysis, it is fair to say that motivated people and great leadership are what makes any group successful, be it a business or a country.
The goal to make the Russian empire the best country in the world and a role model for foreign territories flourished among its citizens. Bourgeois traits, or materialistic and money-oriented characters denoted disgraceful nature and proclaimed and enemy of consolidation of the Russian people. The traditional thought endured that no one can attain immense wealth via honest methods. This attitude remained with the Russian peoples following the Great Northern War in 1721, past the 1917 Revolution, past the Soviet Collapse, until today. The essentiality lies within the revolutions in the 1917 and 1991, where their cause lay in political agendas shifting away from the alignment of the Russian culture, furthermore shifting away from people’s expectations of fair leadership. These critical moments are the key to understanding the Russian culture, furthermore empowering …show more content…

Unfortunately, his successors did not last in the office too long due to illnesses. Constant changes in power did not resonate with the people- they were looking for someone take control, ultimately facing stagnation (World Atlas 1). Gorbachev took power in 1985 creating disputatious capitalist reforms as panacea for all economic and social maladies. No matter how much the Western press praises him for freeing Eastern Europe, the majority of republics of USSR consider him a weak leader and a traitor who tried to establish democracy and market economy at a time when the economy was in a downfall. Instead of following China’s example in establishing "We were well on the way to a civil war and I wanted to avoid that,"As a leader,

Show More
Related
619 Words | 3 Pages

Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

In the historical monograph Nicholas II: Twilight of the Empire, Dominic Lieven revisits the life and times of the last emperor of Russia and the Romanov dynasty—Nicholas II. Lieven analyzes Nicholas II’s life experiences from early childhood to his death during the Bolshevik Revolution. With the conviction that past studies on Nicholas II and the fall of the Russian Empire have been insufficient for better understanding the tsar’s true role in the context of his time. Lieven argues that Nicholas II was not strictly a stupid or incompetent leader, who single handedly brought and end to the Russian autocracy. Instead, Lieven suggests that numerous decisions made by the Russian tsar were in many circumstances reasonable—when considering Russia’s political, social, and economic contexts.

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

In 1917, Tsar Nicholas ll is the current ruler of Russia. Russia’s economic growth is increased by the Czar’s reforms of the production of factories. During this era, Russia desperately needed to keep up with the rest of Europe’s industry. This reform worked perfectly, but the working conditions of these factories didn’t charm factory workers. After the events of the Russo-Japanese War, “Bloody Sunday”, and WW1, Russia was in utter chaos under the Czar’s ghastly leadership.

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction The Russian had problems with different things like nicholas the second and how weak the leadership is and the starvation of civilians and this caused the revolution of russia and this changed russia. Russia was a vast multinational placed that was controlled by romanov. Body Paragraph One Nicholas the second was one of the problems i think because he made all the laws and policies when he also took control russia was behind on industrial product so he made more industrial product and that increased the urban poor but people in russia still lived on farms. The urban poor worked in factories and they worked for long hours with little pay and the conditions weren't so great.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

As college history teacher Matthew Dallek points out in his book about Reagan’s rule, his achievement was “departing from the almost single-minded anti communism that had defined him throughout his political life”. Not the kind of effort akin of a man who ended communism. Once those foreign issues were solved, Gorbachev dedicated himself to implement his reforms into the USSR. They seem quite moderate today, with plans such as implementing a “limited market economy”. But his reforms had many unintended effects which directly led to many Soviet citizens to

Read More
1140 Words | 5 Pages

The nature of Russian society is characterized by a sense of idealism. Russia’s beliefs of the potential for an ideal future have been pervasive throughout history. In 1920, Yevgeny Zamyatin wrote the short story “The Cave” during the midst of the Russian Civil War, a time when nationalism was at an all time low and people were hoping for a brighter future. In contrast to the goals that sparked the revolution, Zamyatin argues that the Russian Civil War will result in a primitive and decimated society that is ultimately worse off than the society that existed prior to the rebellion.

Read More
936 Words | 4 Pages

Gorbachev had a Glasnost policy reform in which Perestroika was implemented. Perestroika was a political movement made by Gorbachev to reform and revitalise the Soviet Union from the 1985-1991.The Soviet Union were struggling with loss of power, economically and falling behind in modern technology and ideals, Gorbachev attempted to fix this. Gorbachev pushed for more political freedom within the Soviet Union as well as attempt to restructure the Peoples Congress. Furthermore, Gorbachev abandoned the struggle supporting other communist states as it was adding to the economic distain within the Soviet Union, putting an end to the communist/capitalist struggle. The peaceful and attempted reform of the Soviet Union by Gorbachev to a large extent helped place an end to the cold

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Historian George F. Kennan maintains that the ideology and circumstances of the Soviet Union were accountable for the political nature of this communist state. Kennan discusses a distinct pattern of thought and concepts to describe the Soviet Union 's position on capitalism and motivation for their conduct. Kennan understands Russian History to be a significant influence in the nature of the Soviet Union 's conduct and discusses a clear hostility towards capitalism. Capitalism was perceived as a destructive and unjust ideology. It exploited the working class, failed to produce adequate resources and created uneven economic and social distributions.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

This highlights the still present class system in Russia. Even though serfs had been freed they were still being treated as the lowest class, but in turn they were still free to vote and do everything any other free Russian citizen could do, in theory. Things were still unequal and life was hard for the serfs. Serfs who had recently been freed had no means for income and struggled to provide for their families. This arrangement worked in favor for the Russian government because the freed unemployed serfs would join the army and help Russia fight.

Read More
2321 Words | 10 Pages

Russia’s historical experience was eccentric but yet not completely divorced from European influence. In fact, in the 18th century European contemporary ideas were deliberately brought to Russia with a view to modernize its alleged medieval existence. Many contemporaries claim the ruler of that period, Peter I, the Great, to have transformed Russia “from non-existence into being” (Hughes 2009, 165). Or also as the English author Harold Nicolson wrote: “It was Peter the Great who, within a quarter of a century, transformed Russia from a barbaric Asiatic principality into a centralized monarchy, capable of playing its part in the European balance of power.”

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

During the 1960s and 1970s, communism was still lingering in the Soviet Union. Stalin’s two communist successors, Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev still held onto their deep philosophy and communism. Politburo, the committee of the Communist Party still held firmly to their oppositional position of all other political parties. The Soviet Union, however, would take a turn for the better in the 1980s.

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

Asian Americans migrated into the United States as early as the mid nineteenth century. Asians have shown various patterns of migration into the United States. Adaptation has been one of the hardest problems they have encountered. Asian Americans is the general term for the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Filipino, Vietnamese, and Asian Indians as well as a few others. Although they all fall into the Asian American category they all have significant differences.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

I covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.

Read More
717 Words | 3 Pages

A good leader inspires his team with good ethics, encouragement, trust, commitment and overall sense of wellbeing. Leading by example is in fact a reality. A team that is led by a most creative and innovative leader with an aim to succeed will in fact be successful if that leader has the will and know how to make that team operate in one accord. Peterson (1961), in his book,

Read More

More about Fair Leadership In Russian Revolutions

Related Topics

Open Document