ipl-logo

Summary Of Nicholas II: Twilight Of The Empire By Dominic Lieven

658 Words3 Pages

In the historical monograph Nicholas II: Twilight of the Empire, Dominic Lieven revisits the life and times of the last emperor of Russia and the Romanov dynasty—Nicholas II. Lieven analyzes Nicholas II’s life experiences from early childhood to his death during the Bolshevik Revolution. With the conviction that past studies on Nicholas II and the fall of the Russian Empire have been insufficient for better understanding the tsar’s true role in the context of his time. Lieven argues that Nicholas II was not strictly a stupid or incompetent leader, who single handedly brought and end to the Russian autocracy. Instead, Lieven suggests that numerous decisions made by the Russian tsar were in many circumstances reasonable—when considering Russia’s political, social, and economic contexts. Not only did Lieven make great use of secondary …show more content…

Lieven attempted to provide a clearer picture of the last Russian tsar by comparing Nicholas II’s personality, upbringing, beliefs, administrative style and overall characteristics of the time period with other monarchies, personalities, dominant belief systems, etc. (x). In many cases this approach did help with understanding the personalities of other contemporary powers whom Nicholas would be interacting with. However, some comparisons had few concrete connections regarding the conditions that affected the young tsars. For example, Lieven compares Nicholas II’s upbringing with the last shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (30-1). Although the two historical figures do share some similarities, the unique conditions under which each event developed are too far removed from each other; geographically, culturally, economically, politically, and period in history. Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that this particular comparative analysis failed to draw any definitive conclusions concerning the Russian tsar’s

Show More
Related

Explain How Ivan III How Could He Secure The Domains Of His Father

740 Words | 3 Pages

He started the trend of “czars” in Russian government and declared himself the czar or Caesar. He was also referred to as the “gatherer of the Russian lands”. He realized that there was a problem with having 5 princes govern the same area and made strives to gain complete authority. He used several different methods to take control away from his brothers and the author says that despite his skilled efforts (diplomacy, force) luck was a vital component to his gaining the power. 2.

Read More

The Huguenots: Louis XIV, The King Of France

1935 Words | 8 Pages

This document review describes and compares three documents written by the rulers of three European nations: Louis XIV, the king of France; Frederick William, the Great Elector of Brandenburg-Prussia; and Peter the Great, the emperor of Russia. Through these documents, we are able to see what was most important to these monarchs, and what they considered best for themselves and their countries. Although textbooks are useful for reading descriptions of historical people and events, through reading documents such as these, we are able to see not only what these rulers did, but also their motives and their rationalizations of their decisions. In “Louis XIV Revokes the Edict of Nantes”, written in 1685, Louis XIV explains that the Huguenots,

Read More

Analysis Of Memoirs Of A Revolutionist By Vera Figner

444 Words | 2 Pages

In analysis of Vera Figner’s Memoirs of a Revolutionist, Figner expressed a few political goals that led her to assume violence as the only answer to the economic, political, and social injustices forced upon the peasants, by the government authority and Russian traditions. All of Figner’s energy was spent in effort to achieve these goals at any cost. These goals were to use influential propaganda, to educate the peasants1, and to kill the Tsar. All of which, were used to motivate a peasant uprising, to remove2 the suppressive Tsarist regime and to give birth to democratically3 free institutions4. To justify her violent means, she used her personal belief that there were no other peaceful ways, that they had not tried, to provide liberty and justice for the peasants.5

Read More

How Did Peter The Great Rule Russia

1189 Words | 5 Pages

Peter the Great ruled Russia for many years as both Tsar and Emperor. He was known for his intense and crafty leadership where his political and social changes led to the modernization of Russia. At times Peter was a cruel leader and ordered executions of many followers and would execute men with his own bare hands. During his time in power Peter was considered “Peter the Great” by many followers. He was no doubt a great leader and ruler in Russia and wanted his supporters to earn a good education.

Read More

Joseph Stalin Dbq

619 Words | 3 Pages

Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.

Read More

Discuss The Changes And Continuities Of Ivan III

178 Words | 1 Pages

Part A: Two continuities that Ivan III, Ivan the IV, Peter the Great and Catherine the Great used to consolidate their political power over Russia was the use to religion and military support to gain more power. Ivan III thought that the smart way to consolidate his power would be to organize a strong army which held an emphasis on military and to also tie in religion and nationalism to gather and gain support for his campaigns. This also can be shown how Peter the Great created a stronger and more organized military and also improved weaponry. Another continuity was through expansion which all these leaders did. When Ivan III gained control he chose to unify city states and make ongoing changes which showed how Russia was growing and changing.

Read More

1917 Russian Revolution Dbq

1271 Words | 6 Pages

With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity

Read More

Grigori Rasputin: The Fall Of The Romanov Dynasty

243 Words | 1 Pages

The three-hundred year Romanov dynasty came to an abrupt end during the Russian Revolution of February 1917, following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II. There were many factors that facilitated the fall of the Romanov dynasty; a much debated factor among them was the influence of Grigori Rasputin considered as ‘fatal disease’ by revisionist historian, Michael Lynch that imposed significant threat to the Romanov dynasty. Rasputin 's influence over government posts and his rumoured relationship with the Tsarina was undoubtedly damaging to the reputation of the tsar, as people began to mock the tsarist regime at a time when it was already under immense pressure. However, the role of Rasputin in the fall of the Romanov dynasty was less significant

Read More

Who Is Peter The Great Ruler Of Russia

1581 Words | 7 Pages

Peter the Great of Russia was a strong and absolute ruler. Czar Peter I used a form of absolute rule called autocratic rule. This means that he ruled with unlimited authority over his subjects and land (Mendrala, 41). Many people identify Peter the Great as a tremendous modernizer of Russia. Peter the Great is responsible for Russia’s westernization; he enforced Western ideas, technology, and culture.

Read More

Was Tsar Nicholas Responsible For The Collapse Of The Romanov Dynasty?

1052 Words | 5 Pages

Since the majority of Russians were Orthodox, they believed that he had been appointed Tsar by God, it was his divine right, worshipping him as his own deity. Source 1 is a Russian Orthodox icon, depicting Nicholas as a saint, symbolising the country and the religion's devotion to him. But this was all about to change. So was the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty Nicholas’ fault?

Read More

Ivan Chetvyorty: The Reign Of Ivan The Terrible

1095 Words | 5 Pages

Amid the constructive period in Ivan’s clout, he popularized self-government, reformed tax collection, and instituted statutory law and church reform. The tsar had quite prompt and constructive ideas to better the country. The schemes that he suggested were carried out, but a number of them failed. They crumbled due to Ivan the Terrible’s temper.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The American Revolution And Russian Revolution

695 Words | 3 Pages

A little over a century later, on July 17, 1918, a Bolshevik assasinatiom group executed Czar Nicholas II, putting an end to the Romanov family dynasty. Seemingly, both of these leaders share similar characteristics that had a critical impact on causing the French and Russian

Read More

Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

Read More

Vladimir Putin Ethical Leadership

1070 Words | 5 Pages

I covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.

Read More

Three Sisters Character Analysis

1666 Words | 7 Pages

Succumbing to professional and personal dilemmas, it is clear why Andrei would be dissatisfied with life. Andrei’s plight is used to show how educated nobility suffered from serious pressure and struggles, which could lead to a somber

Read More

More about Summary Of Nicholas II: Twilight Of The Empire By Dominic Lieven

Related Topics

Open Document