More handpicked essays just for you.
Salem witch trials and how the effect us today
Discuss the crucible play by arthur miller
Discuss the crucible play by arthur miller
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When seeking revenge, one will do anything in their power to achieve it. “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller takes place during the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. The trials occurred when a group of teenage girls was caught dancing in the forest by Reverend Parris. After the small Puritan village was flooded with the thought of witchcraft, Reverend Parris begins to question the girls. Knowing their punishment would be extremely severe, Abigail Williams and the girls blame many innocent people in their village for their wrong doings.
The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, is a surprising story of a town plagued by the belief that witches have invaded the streets of Salem, Massachusetts. With the use of heavy dramatic irony, those that encounter the story experience frustration as the result of many innocent townsfolk being condemned to death. The readers of the story recognize the fictitious proclamations of witchcraft, but those in the town of Salem actually validate the accusations against the alleged witches. Falsely accused and falsely condemned, the “witches” are sentenced to the rope; all this occurred simply because Abigail Williams wanted to obtain the affection of the man she loved, John Proctor. Through crazy stories and expressive writing, Miller took the reader on a captivating journey back to 1692 where bizarre things befell those residing in Salem.
To continue, Abigail is manipulative. When accused for being affiliated with witchcraft,
This disgusting behavior seen today is also seen in The Crucible by Arthur Miller. The Crucible is the story of a young Puritan woman in 1692 Massachusetts who made false witchcraft accusations in an attempt to save her life and to end a rival’s life. While her actions are horrific and the cause of numerous deaths, the actions of the adults around her that enabled her lies to cost lives are despicable. Through his dishonest characters, specifically Reverend Parris, Judge Danforth, and John Proctor, Miller exposes the evils of lying to save one’s name and the destruction that inevitably ensues.
Similarly, In The Crucible by Arthur Miller and Witch Child by Celia Rees, false claims based on intolerance of witchcraft lead to unjust consequences.
Since in their respective times, gathering evidence was hard, so much of the proof came from the words of others, and that evidence could have been easily manipulated. This correlates with the Crucible because Rebecca Nurse was being accused for the most unnatural of reasons from Mrs. Putnam. For example, in Act 2, Francis tells Proctor that “For murder, she’s charged! . For the marvelous and supernatural murder of Goody Putnam’s babies” (Miller 1175). This displays that accusations were being treated like hard evidence, and that no one considered the “proof” was lies that they were telling for their own benefit.
Henceforth, few regulations enjoined by superior authority were acknowledged in small areas like Salem, Massachusetts. Danforth proclaims “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the jails from Marblehead to Lynn, and upon my signature?... And seventy-two condemned to hang by that signature?” (Page 87). Danforth, apparently, derived pride and a sense of condescension from condemnation and punishment.
She does this by taking advantage of the salem witch trials and accuses Elizabeth of witchcraft and being a lying, cold, sniveling women hoping she will be executed. While in the courtroom, Abigail fakes many things in order for her plan to work. She lies about seeing a bird in the church and she acted as if she was burning and freezing all due to “witchcraft”. In court Elizabeth was asked if Proctor and Abigail were having an affair and lies because she wants to protect her husbands good
In the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, it is clear that most people (specifically the court) favour the accusers more than the accused. Act three has many examples of why this statement is true, both directly and indirectly. The court is supposed to be a fair place for people who are accused to try to prove their innocence, and the court takes advantage of these accused people and gets them into even more trouble. At the start of the play, the people of the court are introduced as fairly untrustworthy and suspicious people. If one person says anything, the court believes them no matter what, unless they are the accused, of course.
Imagine living in a small town where your voice is not heard, and your life does not matter. The crucible bu Arthur Miller, tells a story about many young women who have been accused with witchcraft. Many innocent people were accused and killed while the group of people who actually attempted witchcraft were set free. In the crucible we see that Abigail Williams is a manipulative and selfish young women, who blames other people to cover up on her lies and mistakes.
On the Play "The Crucible by Arthur Miller, we follow the dramatic story of a group of people on Salem Village in which crimes of "wirchcraft" are being accused among the citizens of the village. We are able to percive the message that people in order to avoid consequences for wrong actions find another person to take the blame. By the 1870s, Salem Village was primarly goberned over religious beliefs, in which all the saint and demons were creatures existed under the minds of the innocent people. On the story Abigail and a group of girls, start dancing on the forest(something that was prohibited by the strict religion.
The crime and the cover-up, we see it all over T.V. shows and movies nowadays. Likewise, in The Crucible by Arthur Miller, people, out of fear, shame, or pride will perpetuate and defend their mistakes. In The Crucible, many of the young girls in their puritan society begin to accuse other members of the town of witchcraft. The town nearly loses its sanity as more and more people begin to lie and cover their tracks. This theme is illustrated through the surreptitiousness of the judges, Elizabeth Proctor, and Abigail Williams.
Furthermore, Miller constructed the witch trials in The Crucible in a way so that they mimics the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) hearings. In order for the HUAC to subpoena someone for being a communist, all that was required was suspicion of what was considered subversive political activities. No proof was required, a simple accusation was all it took for someone’s life to be potentially ruined by the fallout of the hearing. In Salem, a simple accusation was also all that was required for someone to stand trial for being a witch. “I saw Sarah Good with the Devil!
Margo Burns, the author of “Arthur Miller's The Crucible: Fact & Fiction” clears up misconseptions and answers the questions many reader ask. As one reads, Burns explains what really might have happened and how events in the play “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller have been changed to benifit the readers appeal. Miller creates many claims, however most of them do not belong to her. She talks about other writters and their points more often than her own views and opinions. Yet, she has been studying the Witch Trials when she states “I've been working with the materials of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 for so long as an academic historian” (Burns 1).
This starts a spree of lying and blaming which causes multiple innocent people to be hanged for being accused of witchcraft. One lie started a moment in history people today call crazy, unacceptable, and unrepeatable. “The Crucible” is a play that explains, through a crazy but remarkable story, why lying is a sin. In the present, lying could occur more frequently that truth is told.
