ipl-logo

Family Guy And Freud Rhetorical Analysis

1265 Words6 Pages

The show Family Guy has been around since April 1999 and is still going on today. The show is about a Family that lives their everyday lives doing either outrages or normal things. The show has been canceled and brought back several times in regard to the content and level of humor they use. A lot of people may find the show very prejudice and distasteful. However the show still has some education and moral values within it. Throughout the article “Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious” we get the author Antonia Peacock’s view on the show and how she interprets it. She uses a lot of the rhetorical strategies when it comes to explaining her reasoning. It seems as if she is in favor of people watching it and I agree …show more content…

Her argument is that two or three jokes are clearly interesting and attractive for television while others are amazing, threatening, and to an exceptional degree abominable for television. Family Guy has been on national television for more than twelve seasons so far however, not without encountering different scenes of media dialog. The show makes jokes that are pointed towards different prestigious people bringing on confirmed clash and unsettling impact amongst two or three viewers. Antonia submits the show was excessively opposing for her at first, yet as more scenes pitched and the show's unmistakable quality made her really expected to urge herself to watch it more. Seth Macfarlane the maker of Family Guy is not exceeding any laws so why is he constantly being annoyed and sued for his creation. Antonia clears up that people are not obliged to watch the show by any methods so if you are a viewer and you feel so assaulted by the show don't watch it. Family Guy is projected for grown-up …show more content…

Once Family Guy got to its 200 episode they decided to talk to the cast of the show since reaching episode 200 was such a significant milestone for them. The cast pretty much talked about every episode that they liked and gave reasoning behind it. The creator of the show Seth MacFarlane states that “The show doesn’t set out to shock for shocks sake it also has to be funny” (200 Episodes Later). He mentions this when talking about the episode called Partial Terms of Endearment, which is an episode that speaks on the social topic of abortion. With that statement being said he knows that the topic is touchy and is hard to talk about but it can still be discussed and lighten up by a bit of humor. Another member of the cast thinks that the episode was more about having an intellectual discussion on the topic and balancing it out with humor. There is an article on The New York Times from the Arts Beat Blog that discuss that specific episode with Seth MacFarlane and the producer Danny Smith. They do a question and answer session with the two to understand where they were coming from more. A question was asked about how the Idea for the specific episode originated and the response received was “We’ve found in the last couple years that by taking serious stories that could be movies of the week on

Open Document