ipl-logo

Family Guy And Freud Rhetorical Analysis

1265 Words6 Pages

The show Family Guy has been around since April 1999 and is still going on today. The show is about a Family that lives their everyday lives doing either outrages or normal things. The show has been canceled and brought back several times in regard to the content and level of humor they use. A lot of people may find the show very prejudice and distasteful. However the show still has some education and moral values within it. Throughout the article “Family Guy and Freud: Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious” we get the author Antonia Peacock’s view on the show and how she interprets it. She uses a lot of the rhetorical strategies when it comes to explaining her reasoning. It seems as if she is in favor of people watching it and I agree …show more content…

Her argument is that two or three jokes are clearly interesting and attractive for television while others are amazing, threatening, and to an exceptional degree abominable for television. Family Guy has been on national television for more than twelve seasons so far however, not without encountering different scenes of media dialog. The show makes jokes that are pointed towards different prestigious people bringing on confirmed clash and unsettling impact amongst two or three viewers. Antonia submits the show was excessively opposing for her at first, yet as more scenes pitched and the show's unmistakable quality made her really expected to urge herself to watch it more. Seth Macfarlane the maker of Family Guy is not exceeding any laws so why is he constantly being annoyed and sued for his creation. Antonia clears up that people are not obliged to watch the show by any methods so if you are a viewer and you feel so assaulted by the show don't watch it. Family Guy is projected for grown-up …show more content…

Once Family Guy got to its 200 episode they decided to talk to the cast of the show since reaching episode 200 was such a significant milestone for them. The cast pretty much talked about every episode that they liked and gave reasoning behind it. The creator of the show Seth MacFarlane states that “The show doesn’t set out to shock for shocks sake it also has to be funny” (200 Episodes Later). He mentions this when talking about the episode called Partial Terms of Endearment, which is an episode that speaks on the social topic of abortion. With that statement being said he knows that the topic is touchy and is hard to talk about but it can still be discussed and lighten up by a bit of humor. Another member of the cast thinks that the episode was more about having an intellectual discussion on the topic and balancing it out with humor. There is an article on The New York Times from the Arts Beat Blog that discuss that specific episode with Seth MacFarlane and the producer Danny Smith. They do a question and answer session with the two to understand where they were coming from more. A question was asked about how the Idea for the specific episode originated and the response received was “We’ve found in the last couple years that by taking serious stories that could be movies of the week on

Show More
Related

Kurt Vonnegut Rhetorical Analysis

59 Words | 1 Pages

the idea of equality was taken to the extreme. Satire is also used to exaggerate how awful equality is to persuade readers to believe that total equality will violate human rights. Kurt Vonnegut also uses symbols such as handicaps which make everyone equal and Harrison Bergeron to display the lack of freedom present in a world of total equality.

Read More

Analysis Of The Goldbergs And The Twilight Zone

1208 Words | 5 Pages

Television programs often retain an aspect of reality in order to relate to the audience and commentate on social issues. Although both The Goldbergs and The Twilight Zone address controversial issues such as gender roles, insanity, and ethnic stereotypes, genre differentiates their approach and their audiences’ receptiveness to change. Whereas The Goldbergs, an ethnic sitcom, addresses the external world using comedic relief, The Twilight Zone, a science fiction program, delves into the human mind using imagination. Despite their common efforts to direct social change, the programs are inverse images of one another, and The Twilight Zone’s genre structure allows it to resonate more with the audience. From 1949 to 1956, The Goldbergs dominated television as the first televised sitcom.

Read More

Catcher In The Rye Rhetorical Analysis

295 Words | 2 Pages

In day 4 of the reading, Holden takes a cab drive and once again brings up the question of where the ducks go during the winter, symbolizing his childlike curiosity and how he wants to be free from society just like the ducks. Holden brings up the question about the ducks, asking "does somebody come around in a truck or something and take them away?" (Page 82). This shows Holden's childlike curiosity is still prevalent, asking a question that is obviously untrue but an ideal solution to the question. It also symbolizes how he is like a duck, who does not know what he wants to do, whether it is to transition into an adult and fly away, or stay in the lake and freeze in childhood.

Read More

Catcher In The Rye Rhetorical Analysis

828 Words | 4 Pages

Rhetorical Précis 1: In his essay, “ Love and Death in The Catcher in the Rye” (1991), Peter Shaw claimed that Holden behavior and way of thinking is due to common abnormal behavior in a certain time for teenagers (par. 10). Shaw supported his assertion of the young Holden by comparing the literary culture of the 1950s and how Holden’s fictional character fits within the contemporary Americans novels as a, “ sensitive, psychological cripples but superior character” (par. 3). Shaw’s purpose was to show that Holden’s sensitive and psychological behavior is not abnormal, but such like stated by Mrs. Trilling that,” madness is a normal, even a better then normal way of life” (par 4). Peter Shaw’s tone assumed a highly educated audience who is

Read More

Avenue Q Stereotypes

418 Words | 2 Pages

In Quigley’s article, he asks, “What exactly was funny about the song?” There’s no right answer to this. While being enjoyed by an audience who’s laughing at racism itself the humor comes from watching the characters all try and deny their faults they obviously have, and realizing that they have small biases as well. It’s laughter at racism and its falsities. In this case it’s not morally wrong to laugh at the jokes, because the audience knows that they aren’t there to be racist, but to point out people’s flaws.

Read More

Gender Roles In Bob's Burgers

570 Words | 3 Pages

There is no shortage of programs to watch on television today. While many shows have different variables when it comes to the circumstances or world the characters live in, the formula and roles for the characters is generally the same across the board. Also, many shows still use internalized racism and sexism to deliver cheap jokes to their audiences, although some shows have strayed from this formula to become even better than the aforementioned programs. Bob’s Burgers is a relatable television show that portrays a healthy family, while disregarding commonly accepted gender roles and stereotypes.

Read More

Alain De Botton Analysis

805 Words | 4 Pages

Alain De Botton claims that the chief aim of humorists is not trying to entertain anybody, but instead to convey with impunity messages that might be dangerous or impossible to state directly. Alain´s claim is completely absurd and is wrong for many reasons, cartoons, comedians, shows and acts have been around forever if they were meant to cause harm in any way then in this day and age they would be shut down by now. The game show host of home Family Feud, Steve Harvey, is a comedian and would never cause anyone harm. Alain does make a good point however, it is easy to understand why one would think that chief humorists are trying to target a select few either throughout a show or act. Botton is claiming that the chief aim of humorists

Read More

Father Knows Best Character Analysis

800 Words | 4 Pages

Television situational comedies have the ability to represent different values or concerns of their audience, these values often change every decade or so to reflect and highlight the changes that the audience is experiencing within society, at the time of production. Between the years of 1950 and 2010, the representation of gender roles and family structure has been addressed and featured in various sitcoms, such as “Father Knows Best” and “Modern Family”, through the use of narrative conventions, symbolic, audio and technical codes. These representations have transformed over time to reflect the changes in social, political, and historical contexts. The 1950’s sitcom “Father Knows Best” traditionally represents the values of gender roles and family structure in a 1950’society, with the father, held high as the breadwinner of the family and the mother as the sole homemaker.

Read More

Family Guy And Spongebob Comparison

1114 Words | 5 Pages

Animated cartoons that many people throughout the world spend their days watching as a form of entertainment. Many people find these shows enjoyable for the type of humor that is involved in the shows and the overall presentation of the show itself. Each show presents a different set of characters and a different plot point so it would be safe to assume that each show should be different from the other. Shows like “Family Guy” and “Spongebob” would seem to be completely different based on the intended target audience and the overall presentation of the shows themselves. However, both shows follow a much similar pattern.

Read More

Examples Of Stereotypes In Modern Family

732 Words | 3 Pages

The show is like a mockumentary that uncovers the lives of 3 different, but linked, stereotypical families; the first one is Phil and Claire Dunphy’s family; the second one is Cam and Mitchell Tucker-Pritchett’s family; and then the last family which is Jay Pritchett’s, the father of both, Claire Dunphy and Mitchell Tucker-Pritchett; he is remarried to Gloria Pritchett. Why are they different? They are different in terms of how they are portrayed in the tv series, each fictional family consists of a different stereotype, an example could be Jay’s family; he is the wealthiest but oldest family member among the others and is remarried to a young and sexy but hot-tempered latino woman, with his step-son Manny Delgado. Do you see the ‘stereotype’? But isn’t it offensive to be making fun of these stereotypes in the tv show?

Read More

Family Guy's Existentialism Analysis

1503 Words | 7 Pages

I am also better able to see that deep down, the show produces positive messages about family, relationships, risk-taking, and self-discovery. In essence, the environment of Family Guy is existential, where characters have the ability to make extreme choices; this allows episodes

Read More

Structural Functionalism In Family Guy

854 Words | 4 Pages

The show strives to expose all the preconceived notions and beliefs society has put in place and mocks ALL stereotypes. The show portrays both low and high culture in general and makes fun of them, but at the same time does not encourage it. Most people who watch Family Guy can relate strongly. That’s because the show acts like a mirror and we the audience are forced to take a look at ourselves, but at the same time providing amusement and humor for the reflection.

Read More

Friday Night Lights Rhetorical Analysis

1457 Words | 6 Pages

In Friday Night Lights, H.G. Bissinger appeals to his audience’s sense of emotions in order to persuade his readers that the obsession with high school football negatively affects everyone’s future in Odessa, Texas. Bissinger relies on emotional appeals by employing devices and techniques to present individuals’ personal stories and experiences. His searing portrayal of Odessa, and its Permian High School football team, exposes the side of sports that severely impacts the people living in this society. Bissinger shows the long term consequences of this delusion on the people who are directly and indirectly associated with Permian football. This demonstrate how detrimental the burdens are for the children, which touches the reader’s heart.

Read More

Gender Roles In Modern Family

720 Words | 3 Pages

Despite the creator’s of Modern Family effort to portray a progressive view of American families, the show still accentuates outdated female stereotypes and gender roles; reinforcing gender characteristics, patriarchy and hegemonic masculinity. In contrast to its title, Modern Family promotes traditional gender roles and stereotypes of women, which result in the portrayal of an inaccurate image of the female, and weakens the stance of women in today’s U.S. society. Gender stereotypes are prevalent throughout the Modern Family; the women are all portrayed as wives and mothers, promoting a continued male dominant family ideology. Claire and Gloria are throughout the show acting on our society’s “assumptions about women’s ‘appropriate’ roles” (Dow 19).

Read More

Freedom Of Speech In Comedy

817 Words | 4 Pages

Many audiences of stand up comedy enjoy hearing their favorite comedian entertain them. But what would one think when a comedian cracks a joke about a sensitive topic, for example, a tragedy that affected hundreds of people. Some may argue that, comedians are not supposed to overstep the boundary of controversial jokes. These controversial jokes are linked with political correctness—which is used to describe language, policies, and measures that are taken to avoid offense to certain groups of people. Comedians are not compelled to restrain from controversial topics due to the topic not being sugar-coated, the higher level of contemplation that the joke can reach, and the job of the comedian—to make the current issue manageable.

Read More

More about Family Guy And Freud Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document