Fate Was To Blame In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet

714 Words3 Pages

Fate was to Blame William Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” was a very dramatic play involving a relationship between rival households. The two star-crossed lovers were tragically separated which led to the death of them both. “My only love sprung from my only hate too early seen unknown and known too late” (1.5 138-139). Contrasting love and hate is very effective in portraying the theme and reasoning behind the conflict. The death of Romeo and Juliet is fate's end result. Evidence to prove the statement is hidden within the play’s complex Shakespearean language. The blame of it all became evident within the first couple of lines. The prologue, being an introduction, explained the situation and connected it with fate. Shakespeare states, “From forth the fatal loins of these two foes, a pair of star crossed lovers take their life” (prologue 5-6). This sentence implies that the two unlucky lovers were doomed to death because of their family’s fighting. Saying Romeo and Juliet are star-crossed has to do with astrology and the belief of stars controlling destiny. The chance of this happening could not …show more content…

This leads to him attending the Capulet house party. “My master is the great rich Capulet, and if you be not of the house of Montagues, I pray come and crush a cup of wine” (1.2 81-83). Benvolio insisted they went so that Romeo could once again be happy and potentially look for a new relationship. Given the danger, Romeo went anyways. The servant running into the Montague was a prime example of fate. The characters seem to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, sending them down a path of death and despair. Nothing could have been avoided because nobody knew the outcome. Romeo meeting Juliet was also fate, but less obvious. He attended the party in search of nobody, but falls for Juliet. The two “could” have never seen each other, but that isn't what