ipl-logo

Federalism During Hurricane Katrina

543 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The role of federalism in the united states

What is Federalism? Federalism is a system of government in which a written constitution divides the powers of government on a territorial basis, between a central government and several regional governments usually called states or provinces. Federalism works in some cases but not always. There are certain factors Federalism can’t always meet. Federalism sometimes don’t work because of the central government or the states. But, Federalism allows local action in matters of local concern and national action in matters of wider concern. Personally, I think at first Federalism was working during the Hurricane Katrina event in New Orleans,LA. I thought it worked because for a numerous of reasons. For example, before the locals were doing good trying to make plans to put in place like the highway evaluation plan. The state was Gathering supplies and opening shelters. The airplanes were also on guard. The Federal government was strategizing with the state and getting the needs for the state. Everything was in the the correct position and order. …show more content…

The locals were verging people into lower areas of the state to be safe. There were a mandatory evaluation plan by Bush.The police was helping people out of their house. The state was evaluating from the state. They said “Katrina took out all cell phones and cut the road networks.” Fema are pulling accommodations and ice. They are opening the superdoom for the state. Classic military tactics that Katrina took were take the enemies out. So far some people are starving and dieing. Some people are also getting stuck on bridges, But where is Federalism taking

Show More
Related
931 Words | 4 Pages

Edwards and Wattenberg define Federalism as, “a way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government share formal authority over the same area and people. (Edwards and Wattenburg,70)” When the United States first started to form a central government their objective was to never allow for a dominating power to take over the country again. To do so they created a division of power and made it possible for states and more so the “people” the right to have more of an impact on government. Or so were their intended thoughts when creating the constitution and the branches. In doing so their focus constrained national government but left a loose string as to what the states and their constitutions could do.

Read More
1031 Words | 5 Pages

There became an obvious need for immediate assistance from the National Guard and the Active Duty Army to stop looters, crime, and other chaos that ensued shortly after the flood. Gaining assistance from state controlled National Guard units was not overly difficult. Unfortunately, use of Federal soldiers comes with the stipulation that “the Governor of the affected state must request use of the resources of the DoD”. (Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance) The Governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco and her staff were already failing to control and lead emergency efforts.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism makes both central and state governments more equal in power. Source 2 explains how central and state governments are different, though also what common powers they have. This showing how the national government isn't too strong but also the state government is not too strong as well. Meaning both governments have powers and share powers but not too much, this protecting against tyranny. Source 1 states “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [state and federal],” Therefore state and national governments are suppose to be different and do different governments so they can check one another and share

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism is a fair way to divide powers, so that one group or person would not have more power than the rest when they are building and enforcing laws. This is reliable because federalism equally shares the powers. Therefore, it would not be biased while constructing the laws since everyone would have a say, unlike if one ruler would have all the

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism breaks apart the powers given to the central (Federal) government and those powers given to the states. As seen in document A1, a source from James Madison from Federalist Paper #51, 1788; Madison states, “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments.” This idea from Madison is the idea of the division of power between the Federal Government and State Governments. Federalism provides a “Double security,” that protects the rights of the citizens of the United States of America. As the governments will be controlled by itself, the separate governments will also control each other.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

A federalist government is one with a Central government and many smaller state governments. This was an effective way to prevent tyranny because Central government still had power, but the States still could control their respective state. There is venn diagram in

Read More
254 Words | 2 Pages

Federalism is a system of government where national government and local/state were together/ share powers. Checks and balances prevent any one branch of government from being too powerful because branches must share power. Federalism divides the powers to both national and state government and that's how federalist limit the powers of the national government. Checks and balances can limit national government power through the three branches of government because of each branches designated responsibilities.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

Federalism is a system in which the power is shared between the national and regional government, following democratic rules. a. Dual Federalism: The first period of federalism was from 1789 to 1937, called dual federalism. In this stage, there was equality between the national and state government, but the functions of each of them were fundamentally separated; they rarely operate together.

Read More
152 Words | 1 Pages

“Federalism is a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority (national government) and constituent political units (states). Within the sovereignty of the national and state government, they directly governs the residents within their own assigned territory. They have authority that is not subject to the other’s approval and is constitutionally protected. Abolishment of each other is prohibited” (Patterson, 2013, p. 59). Federalism of 1787 and today divides the responsibilities of government between the nation and states, restraining the influence of both.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

The federal system is a system where both the central and state governments have equal authority and distribute it to the people. Most of the power in the federal government is supported with barely any opposed. People elect two different governments and each one of those are responsible for different tasks. The federal system has a written agreement where you can not make any changes to it unless you have consent from the individual state governments. The benefit of the federal system is that they can not make any changes without the encouragement from the states.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism is a system of government used in the United States that divides power between the National and State governments. The U.S. constitution gives power to both the states, and the federal government, but the states cannot directly contradict the constitution. This makes it so that the broader issues are handled by the federal government, and the smaller, more local problems, go to the states. Sometimes, they must work together in order to make big things happen. A good example of this is the 1st article of the constitution.

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism can be defined as a system in which the power to govern is divided between national and state governments. This belief to share power was constructed by our founding fathers when the Constitution was established. The division of powers was created in order to limit the power of the national government. However, the national government does overpower state laws when the national and state governments don’t agree. As a young democratic nation it was divided between two belief systems, free or enslaved backs.

Read More
410 Words | 2 Pages

The reaction to Hurricane Katrina to me is shockingly similar to events that have happened both in the past and today in New Orleans. In the weeks after Katrina, the people of New Orleans were devastated by the death of family members, and the loss of their businesses, but eventually they began to rebuild the city just like they did after Hurricane Betsy. Since the construction of the levees

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

Additionally, scientists had been warning New Orleans and the government that climate change would lead to increased storm activity and that the city’s defenses weren’t strong enough for such a storm. However, these warnings were ignored by the government and no preventative measures were taken which has influenced the effects of the storm. The reason for the poor response of the government and their negligence of the warnings is arguable. However, it is positive that the reason for this is that the majority of the people affected were the poor, and mostly colored, citizen of New Orleans. The city is racially and economically segregated and these citizen lived in the lower parts of the city, which go down to 11 feet below sea level.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

Read More

More about Federalism During Hurricane Katrina

Related Topics

Open Document