The authors writing style improved his thesis mainly because it gave the reader more details to support his thesis for Judge Sewall's
Courage is being brave and taking the risk of doing something. In the book Witness by Karen Hesse many citizens did not like African-Americans , Jews and Catholics. Leonora Sutter, a character in the book, is a 12-year-old who is African-American and everyday deals with many citizens not liking her because the color of her skin. Courage comes in many ways and Leonora keeping her head high and not paying attention to it is an example. There are many racist people in the town like the KKK.
He changes up his style of writing to keep the reader entertained and also gave them a view of a student’s perspective in
He also specifically mentions three qualities of writers: “a storyteller, a teacher, and an enchanter” (14). He then explains each type, and ends with saying which is most important and explaining why. This structure allows him to more easily organize his thoughts. It also allows his audience to better understand his lecture. It separates talking about two different people, the reader and the writer.
The writer’s voice is the individual writing style of an author, a combinatoin of their common usage of syntax, diction, punctuation, character development, dialogue, etc.., within a given body of text. Distinguished professor of English at Pennslyvania State University, Keith Gilyard explains his first life lessons in his developed essay, First Lessons. He uses phrases like, “I hit the scene uptown in 1952, They doin’ nasty, and I decided to give Judy a sex change operation.” that adds spice to the essay other than just plain out stating what he meant in these phrases.
Voice is a writer’s own distinctive writing technique, which is reflected in dialect, syntax, and a variety of other elements. Much like nobody has identical fingerprints, no two authors have the same writing style. True, a person can attempt to capture an author’s individual writing form; one’s own style will continuously seep through in the form of word choice or even the punctuation. Looking into Ray Bradbury’s creation Fahrenheit 451, a reader can notice how occasionally, Bradbury will create one or two word sentences at various points in the story, and how his voice is riddled with punctuation, more so than a multitude of authors. Charles Dickens on the other hand, periodically writes sentences that seemingly never end, as seen in his work time and time again.
Although he learned a lot due to books, he believes that each book teaches you a lesson. He believes that all bad books usually have a greater lesson to teach you than the good books. Books also thought him what he can and can’t do while writing. While reading books he learned “Good writing, on the other hand, teaches the learning writer about style, graceful narration, plot development, the
Compare and Contrast Writers will often get inspired by an idea, notion, or belief, for this is the basis of writing. As a result, the authors will document their thoughts on the subject, as writers do. However, a person’s writing reflects their personality as much as their writing ability, although some types of writing require a more factual approach. Furthermore, with someone’s personality comes their opinions as well.
After World War 2 the social climate in the United States changed in many ways. Two different things were happening at that time. The United States was scared of an invasion by the Soviet Union. Precautions such as Bomb shelters and Duck and Cover Drills were practiced in schools and work places. Even though the United States lived in fear, the economy of the country was becoming stronger.
He made it clearly that sometimes big words are not good enough, even though you may think is a good way to sound more sophisticated. “Big words at times seem strange to the eye and the ear and the mind and the heart.” (paragraph 2) In this case, the reading brought memories, which is from all the times I have written essays throughout my school education. I have always struggle to develop my vocabulary, but at times I will use big words.
He employs a serious and didactic tone to convey to his views on the issue of debt, along with the usage of conversational diction and syntax that is short and blunt, so he is able to send his clear message to his brother and instantaneously display their familiarity with one another. Through the comparing and contrasting these two writers’ writing styles, the audience is able to see their different impressions
Undoubtedly one of Shakespeare’s most acclaimed comedic plays, A Midsummer Night’s Dream is a humorous and gratifying read, in which the reader’s enjoyment is further enhanced through the ‘play within the play’ in Act 5.1. Evidently a hilarious parody, with its irrational rhymes, absurd accents, and comic performances of the mechanicals, “Pyramus and Thisbe” greatly enhances our enjoyment of the play, by its parallels with the play as a whole and the fact it turns what might have been a tragic play into a comedic one. The bizarre performance of ‘Pyramus and Thisbe’ is compelling and utterly whimsical, and allows the reader to evoke a new-found enjoyment on the play as a whole. Moreover, the elegant and polished flow of language and verse used by the courtiers in the play is truly appreciated when the mechanicals unsatisfactorily attempt to play a tragedy in verse, with Theseus ridiculing Quince’s meagre attempt; “His speech was like a tangled chain” (5.1.124).
Shakespeare submits the entire tradition of the classical tragedy to a process of rewriting in the context of the Elizabethan society. The extreme violence performed on the stage can be read as an attempt to prove both the limits of the traditional literary conventions and the young playwright’s overwhelming creative power. Shakespeare literally writes in blood, as the play experiments with the death and rebirth of language beyond the closed referentiality of myth into a perpetual pattern. Thus, Titus Andronicus opens new paths for the theatrical representation and creates new thematic and technical patterns which will be developed by the great tragedies to
Parallels between Aristotle’s Poetics and Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman Aristotle wrote Poetics in 335BC and in that discourse he defined the elements of a tragedy and compared it to other plays like an Epic. Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, which was written over two thousand years after Aristotle’s Poetics, can easily be considered a modern Aristotelian tragedy. Thereby, a study of Death of a Salesman can help us to understand Aristotle’s Poetics. First off, Aristotle defines a tragedy as “an imitation of an action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself; in appropriate and pleasurable language;… in a dramatic rather than narrative form; with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish a
Deception, Disguise and What Lies Beyond: Aristophanes’ “The Frogs” Aristophanes’ comedies are numbered among the greatest creations of the human spirit, they are a triumph of the creative imagination over the debilitating constraints of reality, a flight into a realm of absolute freedom. “It is to this absolute freedom of spirit which is utterly consoled in advance in every human undertaking”, wrote G.W.F. Hegel, “that Aristophanes conducts us”. As a playwright, Aristophanes is associated with the tradition of the Old Comedy, or comoedia prisca, as the Roman poet Horace termed it and he used the power of comedy throughout his long career to ridicule and condemn the shortcomings of his society. The Peloponnesian War (c. 431- April