ipl-logo

The Role Of Punishment In Modern Society

1447 Words6 Pages

In this weeks reading assignment I read five different justifications for punishment in modern society. First, "Punishing law violators provides beneficial consequences." (Siegle & Bartollas 2014 pgs 4 &5) This method is beneficial because this method send a message to the law violators and to the public, that this type of behavior will not be tolerated and that there are consequences for violating the law. This, I believe, keeps society in order because without order we have chaos.

Second, "Punishment is deserved. Criminal sanctions are justified because those who voluntarily break the law forfeit some of the rights claimed by citizens." (Siegle & Bartollas 2014 pg 6) The guilty get the punishment that they deserve, this justification is …show more content…

A state cannot survive unless it maintains a set of rules that create, support, and protect its structure and process. As the government becomes more structured, these rules are formalized into laws designed to control behaviors that threaten state security and well-being. The law provides that people may be corrected or punished if they engage in socially proscribed wrongs-conduct that is condemned as wrong and threatens the social norm. The American economic system, based on capitalism and free enterprise, could not exist unless there were laws protecting private property and protecting businesspeople from fraud and embezzlement. Because criminal laws are designed to protect the social fabric, the defendant must answer not just to the individual victim, but to the whole polity through its criminal courts." (Siegle & Bartollas 2014 pgs 6 & 7) As I read this weeks assignment, more specifically, about general deterrence and specific deterrence and how the belief that "crime does not pay" applies to both of these. General deterrence is when a offender is punished so greatly that it sends a message throughout a community that committing that crime simply is not worth the punishment. (Siegle & Bartollas 2014 pg 7) Specific deterrence "focuses on the fact that the individual offenders should learn first hand that crime does not pay when they experience harsh criminal penalties." (Siegle & Bartollas 2014 pg 8) I do agree that crime does not pay. A life of crime, I believe costs a person so much, from time lost, memories lost, holidays, birthdays, family. If someone commits a crime, how can they really believe they will not be caught? In the technology driven world we live in there is always something that will get someone caught. If the offense is serious enough, is it really worth that offenders own life? Maybe to them it is. I have a nephew that has been in and out of juvenile

Show More
Related

Pt1420 Unit 6 Research Paper

283 Words | 2 Pages

5. Public trials and executions serve as a deterance of deviant behaviors. These sanctions act as a way to set an example and for people to see what will happen to them if they do the same thing, These sanctions can also be seen as reinforcing boundaries. Although public executions and trials in “town square” are not as common in most countries today, the media is utilized to fulfil the same purpose. When there are high profile cases going on in the United States often tmes the full trial and sentancings are televised so that much of society can see what the repercussions are for defying a social norm.

Read More

Summary Of A Red Light For Flaws By Frank Trippett

543 Words | 3 Pages

Frank Trippett, in his excerpt from “A Red Light for Scofflaws”, claims that these days, every law-abiding citizen commits crimes no matter how big or how small. First, he provides general facts about the average citizen and what they do that goes against the law. He continues by stating that more and more people are becoming criminals by their actions. Trippett’s goal is to inform the public that whether a bank is being robbed or trash is being thrown out the window, it is still a crime. The author asserts an informative and knowledgeable tone for anyone who may think the word “crime” only has a strong meaning when it is related to a life-threatening or dangerous act.

Read More

Criminal Law Brody Acker Summary

254 Words | 2 Pages

Before class began we were assigned to read the first chapter of our book “Criminal Law” by Brody Acker. As I read the assigned chapter it made me think about why criminals are punished for their crimes. Most everyone would agree that they are punished simply because they deserve it, however the book made me realize that there is a bigger purpose to punishment. Making examples out of criminals who have broken the law will detour some others from committing crimes. It scares some because they have seen what could happen to them if they are caught.

Read More

Incarceration And Confinement In Orange Is The New Black

2849 Words | 12 Pages

They offer more diverse options than simply being locked in a cell for years, decades, or one's entire life. I'll also bet that these alternate sanctions are even better at aiding the incarcerated in reflecting on their crimes than any prison or jail cell ever

Read More

Time To Assert American Values Essay

718 Words | 3 Pages

Not From the Mind Punishments for crime and bad behavior have been seen in different ways with some thinking we should be lenient and not give criminals hard times, while others thought that a more severe, brutal punishments to truly emphasis right from wrong. The articles “Time to Assert American Values” by an editor from The New York Times and “Rough Justice A Caning in Singapore Stirs Up a Fierce Debate About Crime and Punishments” by Alejandro Reyes both describe the trial of a teenage boy from the United States who was caught vandalizing in Singapore. Both authors of the articles examine in great detail, the punishments that the young boy should receive for his crime with both articles contradicting each other. After carefully analyzing

Read More

Four Philosophical Reasons For Sentencing

1300 Words | 6 Pages

Ch. 9 8. Identify, define and discuss the four basic philosophical reasons for sentencing The four basic philosophical reasons for sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. Retribution philosophy is defined as a philosophical that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors are to be considered during sentencing.

Read More

Labeling Theory Research Paper

1027 Words | 5 Pages

In the criminal justice system, perhaps one of the most well-known are deterrence and labeling theory. It is clear that these theories contradict the positions of effects on formal punishment in the US justice system. Which one most accurately represents the effect of legal punishment? I would argue that the constant shift of politics and legislation change the effects of legal punishment from these theories. Deterrence works better in some neighborhoods rather than others based on what people actually view is deviant.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Fines In The Criminal Justice System

735 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction Sentencing methods and rationales are continually highly contested in the Criminal Justice system. Monetary penalties are particularly pivotal in these debates. According to Walsh, research from all corners of the world continually demonstrates that the poorest in society are more likely to be subject to the Criminal Justice System. This evidence Walsh argues, ‘cannot be ignored’, when considering which sentencing options should be used. The fine is the most commonly used penal sanction in most Western Penal systems.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

284 Words | 2 Pages

With state-sanctioned punishment being supported by the belief that it is beneficial to the populace as a whole, utilitarians and retributivists alike agree that there is necessity. Though, beyond this point, the two philosophical views seem to split not when determining not the need, but rather the parameters, of coercive force. To a utilitarian, punishment is warranted as necessary based on the consequences of the punishment - that it will provide future benefits to the individual or maximize the happiness of a community. As a utilitarian, Jeremy Bentham justifies the normative grounds for legal punishment through these consequences. Utilitarianism, in this sense, is known as a consequentialist theory in that it concerns itself primarily

Read More

Deterrence And Retribution: Preventing Future Offender

299 Words | 2 Pages

Retribution is mainly a punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or illegal act. For instance, if a person did wrong, that person was punished by having the same thing done to them. In the past history, people used to revenge by taking the law into their own hands and punished criminals (Alarid,Cromwell., Del & Cromwell, 2011). Deterrence is using a punishment as a threat to deter people from offending. A historical example was the execution of Rainey Bethea in Owensboro, Kentucky in 1936 after rapping and killing a 70 year old woman (Durham, 2012).

Read More

Analyzing Rawls Two Concepts Of Rules

1102 Words | 5 Pages

In Rawls’ paper, “Two Concepts of Rules”, he sheds light on fact that a distinction between justifying a practice and actions that fall under said practice, must be made. This distinction, according to Rawls is crucial in the debate between Utilitarianism and Retributivism, more specifically in defending the Utilitarian view against common criticisms, which will be addressed further in this essay. This essay will be examining the troubling moral question that Rawls addresses; The subject of punishment, in the sense of attaching legal penalties to the violation of legal rules. Rawls acknowledges that most people hold the view that punishing, in broad terms, is an acceptable institution. However, there are difficulties involved with accepting

Read More

Arguments Against Retributivism

1926 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will discuss whether the claim that retributivists are making are right by justifying whether their assumptions about moral responsibility are well founded. A person who has committed a crime must be punished. Punishment makes sure that the offender pays their debt to the society or state. Retributivism justifies that punishment is payback for crime and its main goal is to give the offender their just deserts.

Read More

Utilitarian Perspective Analysis

707 Words | 3 Pages

I do not agree with not punishing people who do wrong things. I feel that no matter how big the crime or infraction is, there must be punishment, if not then society will keep breaking the rules, and then we would live in an unsafe world, we would not have a sound mind, and be able to function,

Read More

Six Basic Principles Of Punishment

1054 Words | 5 Pages

Punishment on Trial: Six Basic Principles of Punishment Irvin Arias National University Punishment on Trial: Six Basic Principles of Punishment This paper explores six basic principles of effective punishment in which are most relevant for consideration when using procedures that may function as punishment to change any child's given behavior and if these factors influence whether a given contingency functions as a Punisher. There Must Exist A Behavioral Contingency

Read More

Essay On Harsh Punishment

1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More

More about The Role Of Punishment In Modern Society

Related Topics

Open Document