ipl-logo

Flaws Of Kant's Moral Argument

1502 Words7 Pages

Immanuel Kant’s Moral Argument: Fundamentally Flawed
The philosophical argument of moral reasoning is based on the premise that if God did not exist, then objective moral values and duties would not exist. As objective moral values and duties do exist, it can therefore be assumed that God exists. God provides human beings with an innate moral objective reference point. God is the standard of moral values humans compare themselves to. This essay will argue that the argument of moral reasoning is fundamentally flawed and as such does not support a theistic belief in eternal life. To argue this, I will critically survey the moral arguments made by Immanuel Kant. While I recognize that there have been many contributors to the moral argument, I …show more content…

Kant argued that the theoretical arguments for God's existence were unsuccessful, but presented a rational argument for belief in God as a “postulate of practical reason.” The conclusion of the argument is not “God exists” or “God probably exists” but “I (as a rational, moral agent) ought to believe that God exists”. Kant argues that moral behavior is rational; humans have a reason to be morally good. He argues that if a person ought to do something, then they have a reason to do it. Morality is therefore rational. Moreover, moral behavior would not however be rational if there were no guarantee that it would be rewarded. If there was no reward for doing what is right over doing what is wrong, then it is rational to do what it most personally beneficial, even if that may be morally wrong. If this life is all there is, then there is no reason to be morally good. As there is reason to be good, then there is evidence for something more. Building on this, Kant argued that reason dictated that moral actions must have an aim, and that aim is the the highest good. The highest good is a world in which people are both morally good and happy, and in which moral virtue is the condition for happiness. Kant argues that the highest good cannot be achieved in this life. Reason dictates that the highest good should be achieved. This suggests that for it to be achieved there must be another world/life in which this is possible. This suggests that God exists. Kant argued that morality presented itself to human agents in the form of the categorical imperative and the argument for deontology. The categorical imperative states that a person must “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. This is based on the age old, “do unto others as you would have them unto you”. Kant argued a person must embrace that what they do is only alright if it is

Show More
Related
1555 Words | 7 Pages

(Kant 7) This quotes above emphasizes why good will is most important factor for being morally right. Quote above remarks that good will is

Read More
1514 Words | 7 Pages

In the world of moral philosophy, few other philosophers take such a prominent position as Immanuel Kant. He was a German professor in the 18th century who challenged many notions of ancient philosophy and put ethics over a new foundation, separate from nature. Kant rejects the belief that moral principles are derived from nature. In his book “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals,” he aims at discovering what is good and bad without thinking of nature. Kant believes that ethical principles must be grounded in rationality and universality, which go beyond simply individual preferences or circumstances.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Evan Bakker Prof. Cole Philosophy 1CH 15 May 2015 Honors Ethics Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who lived 1724-1804, and John Stuart Mill, a British philosopher who lived 1806-1873, were two of the greatest moral philosophers of all time. Mill presents and defends the moral theory of Utilitarianism while Kant rejects that theory and defends his own moral theory. Kant explains and defends his claims in a selection titled “The Good Will and The Categorical Imperative,” and Mill in the first two chapters in his selection titled “Utilitarianism.” Both philosophers have opposing viewpoints on whether or not an agent’s motive affects the moral worth of an action. Kant’s view proposes that an agent’s motive does affect the moral worth of his or her action, and Mill’s view proposes that an agent’s motive does not affect the moral worth of his or her action.

Read More
561 Words | 3 Pages

Immanuel Kant, a renowned philosopher, reflected upon the fundamental question of ethics concerning what makes a moral action wrong or right. In the “Groundwork for Metaphysic of Morals” by Kant, he claims that the only thing good is without qualification is “the good will.” Kant’s idea/belief highlights the essence of moral intentions and duty over self-interest or external factors, but it overlooks the importance of outcomes and consequences in determining moral goodness. His ideology sparks philosophical discourse, which leads to varied ethical perspectives regarding moral intention versus the outcomes of determining moral goodness. According to Kant, an act is considered good if done from moral duty and is not influenced by personal desires or external factors.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

As I began reading Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant claims that the NLF of the CI tests for moral worth. In the second section of the book, Kant begins to explain the categorical imperative as the opposite of as hypothetical imperative identifying situations for which each imperative would fall. Explaining that a hypothetical imperative is only followed in certain situations as a means to something else while the CI is followed unconditionally no matter the situation “as good in itself” and to its own end. In this paper, I intend to show what the NLF has to do with testing moral worth and how the criteria are a formidable way to judge morality. I plan on completing this by quoting and analyzing relative information on the

Read More
1947 Words | 8 Pages

With the discussion of duty, morals, and good will, it is once again seen that Kant’s argument entails the dismissal of happiness; Kant says that we have an indirect duty to sustain our happiness because our aim is not happiness itself, but warding off the temptation to act against the moral

Read More
1433 Words | 6 Pages

While some may genuinely and consciously strive to act morally and in alignment with the good will, it might be hard to make the best decision in every instance that life throws one’s way. In his book, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant provides his wisdom and works through his view on the institution of moral philosophy and its relations to aspects of human life by providing a formula defined by the categorical imperative. This formula serves as a guide in moral decision-making and establishes a universal

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Ava Schilsky PHIL 1001H Dr. Colette 4 March 2023 Immanuel Kant’s “The Good Will and the Categorical Imperative” explores the nature of morality and good will with use of allegories and philosophical explanations. He argues that “good will” is the only inherently good thing in the world; unlike “power, riches, honor, and even health,” good will is incorruptible. In contradiction to consequentialism, Kant asserts that the morality of an action is decided by the intentions behind it rather than the consequences. Additionally, this German philosopher makes the distinction between two different impetus for action: either out of respect for the moral law or out of respect for a duty or obligation.

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Dimitris Lykouris, Katarina Mihaljević, Mats Lodenstijn Ethics (700211) hand-out seminar October 8th, 2014 Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) Immanuel Kant Introduction In this paper we will try to introduce the main idea as presented in chosen chapters of Kant's work. For better understanding, it is important to note that his line of argumentation does not start with main hypothesis which is further explicated, rather, Kant uses analytical a priori method (tries to see what follows from the concepts such as good will, duty etc.) and tries to establish the justification of Categorical Imperative. Nevertheless, we will start with the main hypothesis, from where we will turn to the main concepts and divisions behind it.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Kant sees the affirmation of a "pure moral disposition of the heart" that "can make man well-pleasing to God", this pure disposition Kant points to the human reason. While Kant’s answer on the absence of God has also philosophically played in bringing in which Belief and unbelief

Read More
3638 Words | 15 Pages

Similarly to the followers of the divine command ethics, Kant strived to formulate a consistent set of ethical rules. However, Kant argued that ethical maxims should be derived from reason and not given by God. Believing that all humans were rational beings, Kant concluded that there is no need for depending on divine commands, as the universal moral rules that he believed existed could be derived through common sense. Kant called these maxims categorical imperatives and believed that they should fulfill the following requirements: They should be determined by reason.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

Essentially, the will do to good is always good. Kant thought that a good action was the result of someone feeling they are supposed to act a certain way. What Kant went deeper into, was what prompted us to act as if we ought

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Human beings are the only things that have true value. Their moral worth allows them to work out whether an action is the right thing to do or if it is the wrong thing to do. This essay will aim to show how the Utilitarian’s and Kantian’s view punishment for a crime and explains how the Kantian view provides a better moral theory. The Utilitarian’s view of morality is that it (morality) is dependent on the consequences of actions and the level of happiness that is brought about by a specific action.

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Kant believes that most people know right from wrong; the problem most people have is not in knowing what is morally, but in doing it. Kant also argued that rightness or wrongness of particular acts is determined by rules; these rules could be determined by his principle of universalizability. He also argued reason require not only that moral duties be universal but also absolutely binding. For instance, when lying is the only option to save someone’s life, still we shall not lie for it is morally wrong to lie. Kant introduced categorical imperative which states that people ought to do something regardless of the consequences.

Read More

More about Flaws Of Kant's Moral Argument

Related Topics

Open Document