ipl-logo

Flvs Case 3.07

356 Words2 Pages

1. I feel the typical bend of the circulation of riches ought to be similar to what the video said individuals surveyed ought to be. I feel these individuals who have these challenging tasks should get a great deal of pay. Maybe the facts may confirm that they are not working harder than the representatives under them, in any case, they likely worked a considerable measure harder to get to where they are. I feel just as salary increments exponentially when one 's position or level of notoriety increments. I know if I somehow happened to have one of those employments, I would need to be profiting as well. What I think the real band is just about what that really is, yet I didn 't think the main one percent had as much as the video said. I trust one day I am profiting. 2. The way things went to this video is that my recognition, for the main one percent, it is much lower than the truth. 3. I think a great many people 's discernment is off for a couple reasons. The reason may be on the grounds that they don 't have the foggiest idea, neither have they contemplated it. Another reason may be on account of they feel they don 't fall into the top percentiles so they don 't set aside time to consider how riches were circulated. Another reason that may be is on account of they simply couldn 't care …show more content…

4. I feel the conveyance of riches is uncalled for on the grounds that the general population who are in the main one percentile are profiting. They needn 't bother with all that cash even to satisfy their most out of this world fantasies. Those nationals who fit in with the lower levels of pay ought without not need to endure when there is one and only percent of Americans who have cash that can be disseminated in an unexpected way. The other reason is that the matter of why it is unreasonable is on the grounds that their just such a variety of individuals who are making admirably underneath what they

Show More
Related
507 Words | 3 Pages

3. What do the experimenters conclude based on this study and others? Some people have a lot of wealth and a lot of statuses, and a lot of people don’t. As a person's levels of wealth increase, their feelings of compassion and empathy go down, and their feelings of entitlement and

Read More
1728 Words | 7 Pages

(Document 3) Evidently, the increased wealth of the nation is positively correlated to the living standards of the average civilian. With that being said, both these responses came from those of upper-class: one a business

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

Is the author 's argument based on any unproven assumptions? If so, identify the assumptions and identify what information is needed. The author 's arguments are based on unproven assumptions. For instance, he assumes that, it is false that material wealth is the standard of success and this goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit.

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

1. In 300 words or more, please list and describe three pieces of information you found interesting/alarming. Following are three pieces of information that I found the most alarming in a documentary “Park Avenue: Money, Power and the American Dream” (Top Documentary Films, 2012).

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

It is the man of wealth that cannot handle the money correctly. This is proven

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

I agree with Andrew Carnegie’s decision to donate and invest his accumulated wealth in the public because it is the most useful and beneficial way to spend his wealth. Moreover, I believe that distributing the money to relatives or keeping the money to oneself does not sufficiently utilize the money. By donating and investing in the public, a majority of the money can be spent on necessities for the general public, rather than spending the money on a single person. In other words, Andrew Carnegie’s decision to donate and invest in the general public benefits significantly more people than it would if he were to give it to relatives or keep it to himself. Furthermore, I believe that withholding the money to oneself is unrightful in the sense

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

People believe that rich people enough money are very ___

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

Specifically, I have critiques with his second view, the desert view. I am a firm believer that people should have mutual standards as for what they deserve as rewards for their achievements. Although no two people are ever on the same plane, no one should feel entitled to any reward unless it is properly earned. Now when Moriarty is determining what a CEO deserves to be paid, he “…will argue that they deserve to make less than $11.1 million per year [the average CEO salary] given that their employees make on average $55,400 per ear. CEOs are not on average 209 times as deserving as their employees.”

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

I don’t agree with what Krugman says because people such as Steve jobs are not overpaid, they worked for this money and they deserve it. I don’t believe that the super-eire is over paid, they deserve their money, therefore I would change this sentence and they that it is the 99% that are not enough paid. In order to prove this statement, I would refer to “Nickel and Dimed” from Barbara Ehrenreich. Indeed, she experienced what is like to be part of the poor class and working hard for a minimum wage as a maid in a company. Nowadays, there people who work hard and still got the minimum wage because they did not has the chance have an education, or because they were born in the wrong place at the right moment.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

The high society, which makes up around one percent of the U.S. population, by and large comprises of those with unthinkable acquired riches (some of the time called "old cash").The classification called new cash is a generally new step on the social stepping stool and makes up around 15 percent of the public. New cash incorporates individuals whose riches has been around just for an era or two. Likewise referred to as the nouveaux wealth (French for "recently rich"), they have earned their cash as opposed to obtaining it. Not at all like the individuals from the high society, do they have a family connected with old cash.- The following rung on the step is the working class, which incorporates around 34 percent of the population.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

”pg. 24 lines 1-4. We pay people who play games more than we pay someone who runs the whole country. Why are we handing them such exorbitant amounts of money ? “There are plenty of people who have difficult and dangerous jobs, no one is handing them exorbitant amounts of money.”

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

The thing that stuck out the most to me in this documentary, was the fact of how much everything is connected, but due to this it seems like everyone follows the same mistakes. Except unlike the middle class and poor who attempt to save, but cannot. The rich continue to save money when they can afford to use it, and with the fact that the rich are technically not being taxed equally like everyone else is, it’s just not right. With the fact that wages have stagnated as life costs continue to rise, higher than what middle class wages can afford. It’s as if life is too expensive for anyone to live off their wages.

Read More
267 Words | 2 Pages

The one percent of the own most of the nations wealth. I do not believe meritocracy, everyone who has money must have earned it, is valid in the United States. Especially since in the movie the heirs and heiresses barely had careers and the millions

Read More
195 Words | 1 Pages

p66) I believe that the richer become richer and the poor remain poor in a sense. That does not mean that one cannot try and succeed, and change the way things can be. Not everyone is treated equally In addition, the poor pay more money in taxes than the rich do. One can always work harder to achieve more.

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

Economics 102 Group Project (first draft) Introduction The proliferation of income inequality can be attributed to various entities and factors that include the government, firms/market power, and technology. Income inequality is also driven by lack of education and training, discrimination, individual ability, and unequal distribution of wealth. The government is primarily responsible for the well-being of the people for whom the government operates. This point is simply stated according to the Ancient Greek’s definition: “the purpose of a government is to improve the lives of its citizens” (CBSNEWS article 7/12/04).

Read More

More about Flvs Case 3.07

Open Document