Aforementioned, territory in the past has often been defined purely through a geographical sense. Foucault acknowledged that "territory is no doubt a geographical notion, but it's first of all a jurido-political one: the area controlled by a certain kind of power" (Elden, 2013, pg.7). What Foucault means by this, is that historical changes are produced by events which create discourses and form institutions. These institutions demonstrate their power through providing institutional knowledge in the form of "concepts, practices, procedures and norms" (Bullock, 2013, pg.32). This is made entirely possible through the close relationship between power and knowledge. "It is these power relations that make knowledge possible or impossible within the discourse, therefore power and knowledge are inextricably linked" (Bullock, 2013, pg.41). This aligns …show more content…
A Foucauldian conceptualization allows an in depth analysis of territory in the 21st century, highlighting how the definition has changed. A practical example of this is the discourse of intellectual disabilities in the education system. Individuals with mental disabilities have been subject to various terms throughout history (McSherry, 2013, pg.ii). In order to understand what factors brought upon these changes it is important to first explore the events that brought upon change. One notable event is professionals "identifying the emergence of a 'new kind' of people"( McSherry, 2013, pg.12). This created the discourse of mental deficiency. The institutions that provided knowledge were medical institutions as