Foucault came up with propositions regarding sexuality. He consistently argued that it is of the essence to comprehend passion in what he defined as power rather than just understanding sexuality regarding the law, countering the repressive hypothesis. In trying to analyze the existing relationship between history, energy, and knowledge, Foucault came up with four rules that were consequently applied in the comprehension of sexuality including the provision of immanence, the state of continual variations, the practice of double conditioning and the rule of tactical polyvalence of the discourses. In analyzing the rules, a question arises; why does Foucault believe that these rules are vital in understanding sexuality? The Rule of Immanence …show more content…
Foucault believes that primarily, there exists no specific sphere that can be viewed as the most legitimate. The ideological and the economic requirements of power have allowed the establishment and the investigations on sexuality. According to Foucault 's definition of the rule of immanence, it is essential for an individual to have an understanding of the local centers of power-knowledge for them to comprehend the rule (Ball, 2013). The regional centers of power-knowledge are considered to be the place that allows the practices and the discourses of knowledge-production to intersect. An Example of the local centers would be a situation in a Catholic Church between a sinner who is confessing his sins and a priest who is listening and presiding over the confession process. This rule, therefore, implies that the negotiation power that is involved in sexuality can be both indwelling and inherent. In other words, the state of immanence leaves an individual to seek the shifting forces which therefore is initializing an