In Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein,” Victor states, “Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, then he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow” (60). I fully support Victor’s acknowledgment and realization of how dangerous knowledge can be. Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” may have been written on a bet with other fellow writers, but Shelley was holding a mirror up to society when she wrote this terrifying tale. This essay will delve into the portrayal of knowledge and examine how it can be both a force for good and a source of destruction. In "Frankenstein," knowledge is portrayed as a force that holds the potential to unlock significant advancements and discoveries. Victor Frankenstein's thirst for knowledge drives him to pursue the secrets of life and death, leading him to create the creature. Is it his need to prove his teachers wrong and himself right that drives him to complete madness, or can he not fathom the possibility that he is wrong that drives him to his demise? Indeed, through his scientific pursuits, Victor achieved feats that were once thought impossible, showing the immense potential of knowledge to shape the world. But at what cost? …show more content…
Their endeavors reflect the human desire to explore the unknown and push the boundaries of understanding. Shelley suggests that knowledge can inspire and motivate individuals to strive for greatness, leading to societal progress and innovation. However, despite its potential for greatness, Shelley also warns of the dangers of unchecked