Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" tells the story of a scientist named Victor Frankenstein who creates a humanoid monster. The monster is rejected by society and is forced to live a life of isolation and misery. Ultimately, Victor decides to destroy the monster. This decision has been the subject of much debate and controversy. While some argue that Victor had the right to destroy his creation, others believe that he had a moral obligation to keep the monster alive. In this essay, we will explore the reasons why Frankenstein felt he had the right to take the life of his monster. One of the main reasons why Frankenstein felt he had the right to destroy his creation is that he believed the monster was a threat to society. Throughout the novel, the monster is portrayed as a violent and dangerous creature. He is responsible for the deaths of several …show more content…
In the novel, the monster is portrayed as a grotesque and unnatural creature. He is not human, and he is not an animal. He is a creation that defies the laws of nature. Victor believes that the monster's existence is an affront to the natural order of things. He believes that the monster has no right to exist and that it is his duty to correct this unnatural state of affairs. In addition to these reasons, there is also a philosophical argument that supports Frankenstein's decision to destroy the monster. This argument is based on the idea of moral responsibility. According to this argument, Victor is responsible for the actions of his creation. As the creator of the monster, Victor has a moral obligation to ensure that it behaves in a manner that is consistent with his own moral principles. When the monster begins to behave in a way that is inconsistent with these principles, Victor is obligated to intervene. In this case, the only way to intervene is to destroy the