One of the most critical ideas surrounding tragedies is fate and destiny. The idea that an individual’s life is predetermined is associated with many great works of Shakespeare, and transcending through stories, if human beings have free will. If all humans carry free will, does that mean that all humans are responsible for their crimes and inhumanities. Undoubtedly, both topics are explored through the play, but Macbeth corrupts himself with his own destructive actions. The Tragedy of Macbeth stems from the fearless, hero of Scotland who then turned into a ruthless king who will kill anyone he sees as a threat. Macbeth, ultimately, is responsible for his crimes. Shakespeare’s idea of free will associated with fate and destiny is a common theme. Notably, before assessing Macbeth’s responsibility for his crimes, there must be validation as to if Macbeth has free will or a way to change his fate. One example is the choice of actions between Macbeth and Banquo. To mention, Banquo is faced with a similar prophecy like Macbeth. When the witches approached the pair, they said to Banquo “Thou hast get Kings, though thou be none. So all hail, Macbeth and Banquo! Banquo and Macbeth, all hail” (I.3.36) Even though, it is said that Banquo’s descendants will become King while Macbeth will become King in his lifetime. Even so, both characters’ actions are exceedingly different. Each character make a choice. Macbeth makes a choice to achieve his prophecy by force while Banquo chooses the passive approach. …show more content…
Exploring Macbeth’s guilt, influences, and Shakespeare’s theme of fate versus free will supports further blame on Macbeth’s actions. Unquestionably, Macbeth becomes insane as a result of his devious actions. So to answer the question: if an individual has free will, then is that person responsible for his or her crimes, the tragedy of Macbeth provides the absolute answer to this