ipl-logo

Summary Of The Fountainhead By Ayn Rand

743 Words3 Pages

Today, Ladies and Gentleman. Allow me to start off with introducing one of my favorite Russian Philosopher, Ayn Rand. The reason why I have included her in today’s debate is that she correctly understood the central importance of privacy to the underpinnings of freedom. In her 1943 novel, “The Fountainhead”, she noted that “civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy … civilization is also the process of setting man free from men". The earliest treaty regarding privacy is the US Bill of Rights drafted in the late 18th century. The notion that privacy is an essential ingredient of freedom There is a quote from Mr Bob Barr, Chair for Freedom and Privacy at the ACU that supports our very view and shows how our opponents have mistaken. …show more content…

We do not believe so. The temporary becomes permanent. Some might still be willing to accept some compromise of privacy, if only they were proven to make us safer. But in order to agree to the motion, we will inevitably have to take away our common sense, and accept the idea that you will find the “bad guys” in the “good guys”. So basically you will have to find terrorists by drilling into more and more information on non-terrorists. That is us, generally. The actual reality is that you will find your “bad guys”, if any at all, by gathering intel, all sorts of espionage and law enforcement techniques. Every second, there is money going down the drain by gathering intelligence on law –abiding, or spend time limiting their freedom is a resource not focused on the real, legitimate task of government. By compromising and penalizing our privacy which diminishes and undermines our very way of life as I quote from Bob Barr, “is not only a bad policy, it’s counter-productive.” (This is why privacy must come first.) Allow me to conclude today by reminding you something Benjamin Franklin once famously said “ Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety deserves neither Liberty nor

Show More
Related
226 Words | 1 Pages

The right to privacy was not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Up until 1850, the courts did not support the right to privacy. During Prohibition, information was routinely hacked into using telephones and used as a legal bias for prosecution. In Olmstead v. United States in 1928, the Supreme Court supported the invasion of privacy. In the 1960’s, the highest courts began to alter this support.

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

Edward Snowden perfectly sums up the thought process behind the rejection of the mass surveillance: “Privacy isn’t about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect… freedom of speech doesn’t mean much if you can’t have a quiet space… arguing that you don’t have privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” (Document 2). The point of view is from an ardent Libertarian that has contributed to Ron Paul’s campaign numerous times. Edward Snowden firmly believes in the right to self.

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Do you ever feel like someone’s watching you? We may not see it, but government surveillance has skyrocketed throughout the years. Anything that we do with our electronic devices can be monitored by the government. Our privacy can be intruded on and we don’t even have a clue. Once our information is in the government’s hands, it can be spread widely and kept for years, and the rules about access and use can be changed entirely in secret without the public ever knowing.

Read More
2570 Words | 11 Pages

The right to privacy described in Polit and Beck (2017) addresses research with humans and that it involves personal intrusion. Truman did not ensure his research was not more intrusive than it needed to be and did not maintain Perry’s

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

To any uneducated individual, that individual’s right to privacy is as important as his/her right

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

The patriotic Act has been highly controversial and widely citied The act provides sweeping power to government agencies. That is in monitoring the personal habits of terrorism suspects and anyone residing in the United States, or a U.S. citizen residing abroad. Individuals fear that this can be power can be abused.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

”(Anderson). Not only is law enforcement able to track down the terrorists, but now they can find and arrest those who finance their operations. Source four goes into more detail on previse attempts of terrorism in the United States that have been foiled by the Patriot Act up to 2010. The infographic highlights how the Patriot Act has prevented Richard Reid, Jose Padilla, the Lackawanna Six, Iyman Faris, the Virginia Jihad Network, Nuradin M. Abdi, Dhiren Barot, James Elshafay, Shahawar Martin Sira, Yassin Aref, Mohammad Hossain, Umer Hayat, Hamid Hayat, Kevin James, Michael C. Reynolds, Syed Haris

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Liberty has many faces, as it can mean religious liberty, political liberty, freedom of speech, privacy, or freedom to act. Today, the Constitution grants people freedom of religion, speech, press and to act. However, Americans still struggle when fully living up to that ideal, as privacy is a liberty that is being constantly violated. The NSA (National Security Agency) monitors every phone conversation Americans do and have access to servers that hold our personal data, yet it is for national protection in order to avoid terrorist

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Since September 11th, fear connected with national security threats has shifted to fear of the federal government. The U.S.A. Patriot Act certainly caused much anxiety amongst society. Signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, this act increased law enforcement’s surveillance and investigative powers, “The purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and other purposes.” Clearly, federal agents have abused their power, as personal information, telephone calls, and Internet searches were and are being recorded and saved. A recent news article, posted in The Guardian, fully elucidates the intrusive government spying of American citizens, “the watchlist tracks ‘known’ and ‘suspected’ terrorists and includes both foreigners and Americans.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

There are many constitutional implications of government spying programs, one of those being a complete violation of privacy here in the United States. Snowden himself exposed the NSA, as he noted that calls were recorded and various other electronic data were collected on many individuals and kept for future use. There is no denying that the use of spying programs violates an American’s 4th amendment and it often leads to people refraining from posting something controversial due to the fear of being watched. Ever since the WikiLeaks documents were publicized, many people feel paranoid, and rightly so. People used to be able to talk, post and do anything they wanted to with complete freedom.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

Olmstead v. United States, Katz v. United States, and United States v. Jones are just a few examples of how society’s outlooks on surveillance has transformed over time. However, the amendment is expressed as a story “of continuity and change” (Thompson 4). With advancing technology, it has become exceedingly difficult to apply an outdated system of government to the rules and regulations much needed for today. Yet, I believe the founding fathers of this country, who wrote and signed the constitution, stood for something timeless – a sense of freedom.

Read More
119 Words | 1 Pages

To further support this, information that is collected is used to protect the Nation from "threats.” (2.1)Since this information is used to protect the Nation from “threats,” not to intrude on everyday citizen’s privacy, it is not an invasion of their right to privacy. Correspondingly, part of protecting citizen’s privacy is requiring a probable cause for

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

Nowadays, “privacy” is becoming a popular conversation topic. Many people believe that if they do not do anything wrong in the face of technology and security, then they have nothing to hide. Professor Daniel J. Solove of George Washington University Law School, an internationally known expert in privacy law, wrote the article Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education in May of 2011. Solove explains what privacy is and the value of privacy, and he insists that the ‘nothing to hide’ argument is wrong in this article. In the article, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, Daniel J. Solove uses ethos, pathos, and logos effectively by using strong sources, using

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Technology is growing at a fast pace and every day we see a new product or service that is available. Many times it is hard to even keep up with the latest phone, computer, game console, or software. There are so many different gadgets to choose from and even the internet is on information overload. As a result, we can no longer truly expect to have privacy.

Read More

More about Summary Of The Fountainhead By Ayn Rand

Related Topics

Open Document