ipl-logo

Freedom Of Speech In Australia

714 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The negative effects of freedom of speech

Freedom of speech is an important part of the way Australia is seen by other countries as being the land of opportunity worldwide. This freedom of speech may also incite hate speech and other racism views among other discriminatory views.
If freedom of speech brings about discrimination towards religion, sexual orientation and cultures then should Freedom of Speech itself be regulated to protect victims from the opinions of others?
Australia does not have explicit freedom of speech in any constitutional or statutory declaration of rights. There is an implied freedom of speech that was recognised in Lange V Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
In 1992 the High Court of Australia judged in the case of Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd V Commonwealth …show more content…

David Lange was featured in the program Four Corners as the subject of a report which was entailed with defamation proceedings due to the content of the particular episode. At the time David Lange was the Prime Minister of New Zealand. The report suggested that the New Zealand Labour party had become inappropriately influenced of large business interests from large donations from those companies. In a unanimous judgement, the Court required clarification of interaction between the implied freedom of political communication and defamation laws. The implied freedom was held to be a negative right, not a grant of a free-standing positive right, and operated chiefly as a restraint on executive and legislative power to the extent that such power would burden the implied freedom.
In response to the Lange v ABC (1997) case, the court developed a two-part test:
1. Does the law effectively burden freedom of communication about government or political matter? The scope of political communication was amended to mean matters that could affect their choice at elections, or the affairs of federal ministers and the executive.
2. If the law does burden that freedom, is the law reasonably appropriate and adapted to serve a legitimate end which is compatible with the maintenance of representative and responsible government? The objectives of the government in making the law are

Show More
Related

Pastizzi Cafe Pty Ltd V Hossain Summary

513 Words | 3 Pages

Pastizzi Café Pty Ltd v Hossain (No 4) NSWSC 808 (28 July 2011) Facts of the case: - An agreement was made between second plaintiff , third plaintiff and first defendant that third plaintiff and first defendant would conduct a pastizzi café business. - Second plaintiff held the guarantor of the leased premises so it was agreed that she will become an equal partner in the business. - It was agreed that three of them will be equal partner in the business but only second plaintiff and first defendant were listed as directors but not the third plaintiff .

Read More

Compare And Contrast Tinker Vs Moines

968 Words | 4 Pages

Yes, we are allowed freedom of speech, but should there be a limit on this freedom? We can only justify these points based on the Bible. Ephesians 4:29 states this point quite well. “Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying that it may minister grace unto the hearers.” Ephesians shows that we may use the law of freedom of speech only when what proceeds out of our mouth is edifying and useful to the situation and to those around us.

Read More

Ethos In The Lyceum Address Summary

439 Words | 2 Pages

The rule of law is reflected as a core principle of our nation and vital to ordered liberty. To rightly govern the American rule of law it is essential to acknowledge the continuity between the American Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The United States of America “government” is framed by these two important documents. The principles of the Declaration of Independence constitute the foundation of the government based on the universal equality of all human beings, and the U.S. Constitution founds the political process that is to be followed by the elected officials in governing the people. One cannot be without the other; both are essential for a stable government.

Read More

Lange V. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Lange)

122 Words | 1 Pages

In the case of Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Lange), the High Court ruled that as the development of the common law in Australia cannot run counter to constitutional imperatives, the common law rules of qualified privilege should properly reflect the requirements of ss 7, 24, 64, 128 and related sections of the Australian Constitution. Freedom of speech is not absolute. This can be seen in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution whereby it has been held not to protect all speech like obscene publications or speech inciting imminent lawless action. Australian common law has long recognised limitations to free speech, for instance, those in relation to the criminal law of incitement and conspiracy, and in obscenity

Read More

How Did New York Times V. Sullivan Changed Libel Law In The United States?

998 Words | 4 Pages

The Supreme Court decision in New York Times v. Sullivan completely changed libel law in the United States. It set the precedent of the actual malice standard which gave the press a new kind of protection in court. It required that public officials prove that what was written or said about had, “…with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” The Supreme Court did this because they thought it would bring about the main meaning of the First Amendment. However, three justices- Black, Douglas, and Goldberg did not think this change was enough to safeguard the press.

Read More

Elonis V. US Supreme Court Case Study

618 Words | 3 Pages

As seen in the CNN article (regarding Elonis v. U.S.), the Supreme Court needs information regarding previous court cases in order to make a determination in the Elonis case. They summon an Amicus Curiae brief (“friend of the court” brief) asking you to provide information about the First Amendment. Specifically they ask, “What is the current precedent concerning freedom of speech?” Begin your response here:

Read More

First Amendment Restrictions

351 Words | 2 Pages

A further consideration that must be taken into account while evaluating this case is that of time, place, and manner restrictions. Such restrictions are a sort of measuring stick when it comes to these types of freedom of speech issues. If a group or individual does not comply with time, place, and manner restrictions, their actions are no longer protected by the First Amendment. Meanwhile, if these restrictions are adhered to, a party has the constitutional right to voice their viewpoints.

Read More

First Amendment Analysis

1558 Words | 7 Pages

Brennan, Jr. and Justices Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy joining Brennan, with Kennedy also writing a concurrence. The Court dismisses the view that a clearly boundless assortment of direct can be named speech at whatever point the individual participating in the conduct along these lines to express a thought, yet recognized that conduct might be adequately pervaded with components of correspondence to fall inside the extent of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. In choosing whether specific direct has adequate informative components to bring the First Amendment into play, the court asked whether an intent to pass on a particularized message was available, and whether the probability was extraordinary that the message would be comprehended by the individuals who saw it. The Court found that, considering the present situation, Johnson 's flag burning constituted expressive conduct, allowing him to summon the First Amendment. Happening as it did toward the finish of a demonstration harmonizing with the Republican National Convention, the expressive, unmistakably political nature of the direct was both intentional and overwhelmingly obvious.

Read More

First Amendment Advantages

88 Words | 1 Pages

The 1st Amendment does allow for people to have the right to obtain a freedom of speech, however there are limitations as to what is not protected by the 1st Amendment. Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) showed that freedom of speech in their nature is not absolute. The First Amendment is constructed to establish a structure that makes it illegal to stop people from practicing their religion, freedom of speech, right for a peaceful protest in any setting, and printing what they want from the press.

Read More

The First Amendment: The Freedom Of Speech

739 Words | 3 Pages

The First Amendment is the first section of the Bill of Rights and is considered the most important part of the U.S Constitution because it offers the citizens of United States the essential human freedoms of religion, freedom of speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the Government. The first amendment rights are not provided by the government, indeed these are the rights that people inherently possess. This amendment is not only an important amendment but also a controversial amendment in Bill of Rights. Specifically, this piece of writing explains freedom of religion and the freedom of speech below.

Read More

Policing Abuse Committed On Social Media Essay

1168 Words | 5 Pages

However, combatting offensive behaviour on social media whilst not infringing on a person’s Freedom of Expression can be challenging. The Human Rights Act 1998 is the safeguard to prevent this infringement; one particularly pertinent act is Article 10 Freedom of expression.

Read More

Analyzing Colin Kaepernicks 'Standing For America's National Anthem'

611 Words | 3 Pages

Freedom of Speech Most people in the United States believe by standing for the national anthem you are showing respect for our great nation, the military men, and women who fought, risk or gave their lives for our freedom. The article “Colin Kaepernick shows that freedom of speech is an anomaly in America (Oliver Brown),” Brown believes that “Kaepernicks’ protest has shown the US cares more about its anthem than the rigors of social injustice. In this article Brown talks about, how Kaepernick has chosen to sit for the anthem, other sports figures have tried the same thing, only to be ridiculed for it as well, and football fans are upset that Kaepernick did not stand for America’s National Anthem.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

817 Words | 4 Pages

We can’t misuse the freedom of speech, saying words that can cause serious harm (bullying). This form of speech will cause depression, suicide, and stunted social development. When freedom of speech hurts others, then it is not just an opinion anymore; it is a form of hate

Read More

Essay On Freedom Of Speech In Malaysia

965 Words | 4 Pages

Every government do restrict the freedom of speech to certain extend such as speech related to slander, pornography, copyright violation, sedition, libel, classified information are limited in Malaysia, But there are some cases in Malaysia, where government does

Read More

Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Malaysia

1026 Words | 5 Pages

As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

Read More

More about Freedom Of Speech In Australia

Related Topics

Open Document