ipl-logo

Policing Abuse Committed On Social Media Essay

1168 Words5 Pages

Policing Abuse Committed on Social Media
In this literature review, I will be analysing how the police and other criminal justice organisations can deal with offences committed on social media whilst also reviewing currents laws, to determine if new legislation is needed to combat offences committed on social media, or if current laws in place are sufficient.
As social media continues expanding into more facets of daily life with more frequent communication through digital platforms, offences once only confined to the physical world such as intimidation, abusive language, blackmail and harassment have now moved into chat rooms, emails and other forms of social media (BBC NEWS, 2014).
However, combatting offensive behaviour on social media whilst not infringing on a person’s Freedom of Expression can be challenging. The Human Rights Act 1998 is the safeguard to prevent this infringement; one particularly pertinent act is Article 10 Freedom of expression. …show more content…

There are instances when governments and law enforcement agencies can curtail that right if the expression being shared is one that damages public moral, and the reputations of others (Great Britain, Lords Select Communications committee, 2014). It is the duty of the police to find a careful balance when providing justice to those wronged online, without setting too low a precedent and prosecuting en masse anyone who may have said anything unnecessarily and potentially hurtful. The authorities must determine the severity of incidents and whether they are damaging enough to warrant prosecution, but also at what point an incident can no longer be tolerated as a factually inaccurate honest

Show More
Related
1204 Words | 5 Pages

However, the government does not have the responsibility to police what other citizens should or should not listen to as “the right to hear the speech of others is pro­tected by the First Amendment.” (Samples), deeming that act of censorship as unconstitutional. The responsibility to filter through one's media for offensive content falls on the user and not a federal authority which does not know what every citizen deems controversial or not. Therefore, “speech by and for social media users may be presumed to be free of government regulation” (Samples) and would only be counterintuitive for the government to perform as what is offensive is a relative subject. Clearly, media censorship for the purpose of protecting citizens is not a government responsibility as the government being the reviser of media can lead to the mass diffusion of misinformation, as well as lead to the systematic oppression of undesirable citizens.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

This is because they are using free speech as a cover up to make bad statements about others online. Freedom of speech is something people shouldn’t take advantage of just to invalidate or oppress others on the internet, which is why the government or admin need to be clear about the meaning of freedom of speech on the

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

Government is called to dictate internet content when one incites people to violence with his speech, however, it needs to be a true threat which includes immediacy and an actual intent. For instance, during the Vietnam War, a man expressed that “if he got drafted, his first bullet would be for President Johnson.” The Court detected no threat nor any real intent in the context, therefore, the government had no need to monitor what was being said. If the speech did not pose any likely threats but was regulated by the government, one’s freedom of

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Social Media Social media is online platforms where people socialize online or communicate for entertainment, dating, business, or other reasons. Most people of all ages are now using social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok on a daily basis. Unfortunately, some peolpe are using social media to spread hateful messages. Officials are still trying to find ways to manage these destructive messages and create consequences for these cyberbullies. Although some may say that these offenders should not be punished, individuals who are particiapting in cyberbullying should be prosecuted because the victims cant escape the bullying, they feel under pressure, and need a safe lpace to communicate on online

Read More
1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More
1817 Words | 8 Pages

While freedom of speech should rarely be limited, there are instances in which opinions generate threats towards individuals within a society. These opinions are currently being punished, but they continue to occur at high rates. It follows that with tougher punishment, we can deter this action from occurring. When we omit these opinions from our freedom of speech, it provides the harsher consequences needed to deter others. Furthermore, it provides the greatest benefit to society, as it still encourages dialogue around controversial topics, only excluding those in which the harm of the idea being spoken is greater than the benefit it provides.

Read More
1326 Words | 6 Pages

The legality of these orders was challenged in court, with courts ultimately blocking the ban from going into effect. These debates highlight the ongoing tension between free speech and regulation, particularly in the context of new and emerging technologies. While the First Amendment provides protections for freedom of expression, the challenges posed by social media and other online platforms raise important questions about how to ensure that these protections remain relevant in a changing media

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

They encompass all modes of expression that are non-violent or threatening, and fully take into account context to see if there is a value in the restriction.3 This agreement is based on long established English principles mentioned earlier in this paper in Lord Reid's response in Brutus v. Cozens (1973), and later the ideas of Mill, Dworkin and other philosophers. In “The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Expression” (2000), Moon also points to the history of legal cases where the court has been active in protecting and establishing the value of expression in democratic society, citing landmark decisions such as Irwin Toy (1989), Dolphin Delivery (1986) and Ford (1998).4 Noteably, the courts also cite the common law principles as well as philosophical writing on the subject and therefore, cast expression as necessary in the liberal democratic society they are trying to build and protect. Of course, this is not to say any free speech or expression is allowed, as establish with s. 1 of the

Read More
1500 Words | 6 Pages

Manuel Armendariz McKennon English 103—21292 12 April 2016 The Freedom to Hate Apart from restricting our freedom of exploration, censorship protects individuals from inappropriate materials; however, it also limits free speech. Though censorship has limited our freedom of speech, it has impacted our society in both positive and negative ways.

Read More
1562 Words | 7 Pages

Brandon Heard Prof Richard Johson Criminal Justice Administration 506 1001 3/29/23 Social Media with Criminal Justice and judges The use of social media platforms has become ubiquitous in today's society, and its influence can be seen in all aspects of contemporary life, including the practice of law. This is because social media platforms allow users to share and discuss content in real time. A growing number of judges, much like other types of professionals, are turning to social media in order to network with their fellow professionals, advertise their work, and communicate with members of the general public.

Read More
1450 Words | 6 Pages

Those with unpopular political ideas have always borne the brunt of government. The American Civil Liberties Union expresses that, during WWI, a person could be jailed for giving out anti-war leaflets (Paragraph 2). Today, consequences of political activist may not be as extreme, but expressing controversial political stances are is still a problem in today’s world concerning forms of communications as political campaign ads against another party, debates, and public activists and political protests. The problem of speech often lies with how far people go to express their own political views. Forms of expression which insult an individual's personal dignity, damage private or public property, or discriminate against a group based or ethnicity or gender are not defended by the First Amendment.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, Ring (2013) wrote about a thesis entitled “Hate Speech in Social Media: an Exploration of the Problem and Its Proposed solutions”. This study research shows that although most major social media companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter have their own policies regarding whether and what kinds of hate speech that are permitted on their sites, the policies are often inconsistently applied and can be difficult for users to understand. In Ring’s dissertation, she suggested that social media platforms have to encourage self-regulation about what kind of hate speech contents are, and those contents are not permitted on these sites. Forming A working group comprised of social media decision makers will develop the policy and staff members of the Federal Communications Commission will facilitate this process. The focus of her study is the legal communication and scholars of those social media regulations.

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

Social media sites are accessible to anyone to write threatening posts that affects everyone, especially the person the post is targeted at, in the online communities. There have been 4,400 cases of individuals that have committed suicide because of horrible usage of social media use (Russel, 2017). Within these amounts of cases, government action is still not enough when it comes to handing out punishments to cyberbullies or protection to the victims who face these taunting threats

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Dangers of Social Media Lots of people post on social media about their beliefs right? People post their oppian on the network everyday. Many people get in trouble because they forget that nothing goes away and anyone can look at it. Lots of people don't know that when they apply for a job their social media can be searched or checked.

Read More
2363 Words | 10 Pages

1.0 INTRODUCTION In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), freedom of speech falls under the Article 19 which is the freedom of opinion and expression. It protects one’s freedom ‘to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers’ (The United Nations, 1948). Article 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) adds that the freedom of expression could be ‘either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice’. Besides being an individual’s fundamental liberty of expression, Santa Clara University School of Law Professor Russell W. Galloway (1991) states that free speech is the ‘matrix of all other freedoms’.

Read More

More about Policing Abuse Committed On Social Media Essay

Related Topics

Open Document